Skip to main content

Positive Predictive Power

Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology
  • 255 Accesses

Synonyms

Post-test probability of disease

Definition

Positive predictive value (PPV) represents the probability that a person has a disease or condition given a positive test result. That is, it is the proportion of individuals with positive test results who are correctly identified or diagnosed. It is a critical diagnostic statistic because it reflects the accuracy with which a test can identify a disease or condition. In a population, it can be defined as the number of true positives divided by the sum of true positives and false positives. PPV is related to the sensitivity and specificity of the test. Sensitivity refers to the true positive rate for people with a disease or condition having a positive test result. Specificity refers to the true negative rate for healthy people having a negative test result. The relation among these terms is illustrated in Fig. 1.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Terminology

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References and Readings

  • Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., Bruns, D. E., Gatsonis, C. A., Glasziou, P. P., Irwig, L. M., et al. (2003). The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: Explanation and elaboration. Annals of Internal Medicine, 138(1), W1–W12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Labarge, A. S., McCaffrey, R. J., & Brown, T. A. (2003). Neuropsychologists’ abilities to determine the predictive value of diagnostic tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(2), 165–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinnon, A. (2000). A spreadsheet for the calculation of comprehensive statistics for the assessment of diagnostic tests and inter-rater agreement. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 30(3), 127–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smidt, N., Rutjes, A. W., van der Windt, D. A., Ostelo, R. W., Bossuyt, P. M., Reitsma, J. B., et al. (2006). The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: Has it improved? Neurology, 67(5), 792–797.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, S. P., Weinborn, M., & Lovejoy, D. W. (2003). Are classification accuracy statistics underused in neuropsychological research? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 25(3), 431–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Grant L. Iverson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Iverson, G.L. (2017). Positive Predictive Power. In: Kreutzer, J., DeLuca, J., Caplan, B. (eds) Encyclopedia of Clinical Neuropsychology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1234-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1234-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56782-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Positive Predictive Power
    Published:
    01 December 2018

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1234-3

  2. Original

    Positive Predictive Power
    Published:
    11 July 2017

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56782-2_1234-2