Skip to main content

Principles for Developing a Safe and Sustainable Valorization of Food Waste for Animal Feed: Second Generation Feedstuff

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Famine, Starvation, and Nutrient Deprivation

Abstract

Developed countries are producing and consuming more food than needed, which generates a significant amount of food waste. Within this framework, three main strategies have been proposed to control this food wastage: reduction, reuse, and recycle. In the hierarchy of valorization options for any food waste, the reuse for human food or ingredient has to be prioritized, however, due to technical requirements; this option could not be always implemented. The use of food wastes as a second generation feedstuff is an interesting option to many food sectors since it could reduce land use competition, the dependence on the current feed raw materials, the cost of animal feed, as well as the environmental impact associated to its production. However, the feasibility of this option depends on several legal, technical, and economical requirements as well as environmental and social sustainability conditions. In addition, this valorization alternative demands some treatments in order to stabilize and preserve effectively.

Technological cooperation, knowledge, and involvement of different actors in the demonstration of new valorization schemes, from generators to processors and end-users, are of crucial importance due to the important and frequent constraints which affect the technical and economic feasibility of their reutilization: logistic costs, processing costs, availability of raw materials, and heterogeneity of the quality and composition of the wastes. Moreover, food safety experts and regulatory bodies have to be also involved and may contribute to promote the safe and responsible use of food waste for feed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 869.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

ABPs:

Animal by-products not intended for human consumption

CIR:

Cost-to-income ratio

CRF:

Capital recovery factor

EC:

European Commission

EFFPA:

European Former Foodstuff Processors Association

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

FUSIONS:

Food Use for Social Innovation by Optimising Waste Prevention Strategies

FW:

Food waste

GHG:

Greenhouse gas

GIS:

Geographic information systems

HORECA:

Hotel, restaurant, and catering sector

IRR:

Internal return rate

LCA:

Life cycle analysis

LCT:

Life cycle thinking

NPV:

Net present values

PBT:

Payback time period

SDG:

Sustainable Development Goals

References

  • Arvanitoyannis IS, Kassaveti A (2008) Fish: industry waste: treatments, environmental impacts, current and potential uses. Int J Food Sci Tech 43:726–745

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Salem M, Fraj M (2007) The effects of feeding liquid acid whey in the diet of lactating dairy cows on milk production and composition. J Cell Anim Biol 1:7–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstad A, la Cour Jansen J (2012) Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems – current status and potential improvements. Waste Manag 32:2439–2455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Birsen Bulut S, Nihat A (2012) Health benefits of whey protein: a review. J Food Sci Eng 2:129–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalamaiah M, Dinesh Kumar B, Hemalatha R, Jyothirmayi T (2012) Fish protein hydrolysates: proximate composition, amino acid composition, antioxidant activities and applications: a review. Food Chem 135:3020–3038

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Commission Regulation (EU) No 142/2011 of 25 February 2011 implementing Regulation (EC) No 1069/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and implementing Council Directive 97/78/EC as regards certain samples and items exempt from veterinary checks at the border under that Directive Text with EEA relevance

    Google Scholar 

  • COM(2005)666 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the regions: Taking sustainable use of resources forward: a Thematic Strategy on the prevention and recycling of waste

    Google Scholar 

  • Council for Agricultural Science and Technology (CAST) (2013) Animal feed vs. human food: challenges and opportunities in sustaining animal agriculture toward 2050. Issue paper 53. CAST, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Mello JPF, Macdonald AMC (1998) Fungal toxins as disease elicitors. In: Rose J (ed) Environmental toxicology: current developments. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 253–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson M, Strid I, Hansson P (2015) Carbon footprint of food waste management options in the waste hierarchy–a Swedish case study. J Clean Prod 93:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2010) Preparatory study on food waste across EU 27. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/bio_foodwaste_report.pdf. Accessed Nov 2016

  • European Former Foodstuff Processors Association (EFFPA) http://www.effpa.eu/reducing-food-waste/. Accessed Nov 2016

  • European Parliament Council, 2008/98/EC of The European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives. 2008. Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • European Production of Fishmeal and Fish Oil. http://www.eufishmeal.org/production/. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2002) Protein sources for the animal feed industry. In: Expert consultation and workshop, Bangkok, 29 Apr – 3 May 2002. ISBN 92-5-105012-0

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2011) Global Food Losses and Food Waste: Extent, Causes and Prevention. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2013) Food Wastage Footprint: Impacts on Natural Resources. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3347e/i3347e.pdf. Accessed Apr 2016

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2014) SAVE FOOD: Global Initiative on Food Loss and Waste Reduction. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/save-food/PDF/FLW_Definition_and_Scope_2014.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2016a) The state of food and agriculture. Climate change, agriculture and food security. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i6030e.pdf. Accessed Oct 2016

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (2016b) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. Rome. 200 pp. (204 pages). http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016

  • FAO, WFP, IFAD (2012) The state of food insecurity in the world 2012. Economic growth is necessary but not sufficient to accelerate reduction of hunger and malnutrition. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO, IFAD, WFP (2015) The state of food insecurity in the world 2015. In: Meeting the 2015 international hunger targets: taking stock of uneven progress. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) (1978) Use of whey in feeding ruminants. Pierre Thivend. Ruminant nutrition: selected articles from the World Animal Review. http://www.fao.org/docrep/004/x6512e/X6512E09.htm. Accessed Nov 2016

  • Franchetti M (2013) Economic and environmental analysis of four different configurations of anaerobic digestion for food waste to energy conversion using LCA for: a food service provider case study. J Environ Manag 123:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrone P, Melacini M, Perego A (2014) Opening the black box of food waste reduction. Food Policy 46:129–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GISWASTE Project (2016) Methodology based on GIS to prioritise alternatives for agri-food waste reclamation in the Basque Autonomous Community. http://www.lifegiswaste.eu/en/. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Gustavsson J, Cederberg C, Sonesson U, van Otterdijk R, Meybeck A (2011) Global food losses and food waste: extent, causes and prevention. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson C, Lipinski B, Robertson K et al (2016) Food loss and waste accounting and reporting standard version 1.0. World Resources Institute Ed. ISBN 978-1-56973-892-4. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/REP_FLW_Standard.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Jensen MB, Møller J, Scheutz C (2016) Comparison of the organic waste management systems in the Danish–German border region using life cycle assessment (LCA). Waste Manag 49:491–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jin Y, Chen T, Chen X, Yu Z (2015) Life-cycle assessment of energy consumption and environmental impact of an integrated food waste-based biogas plant. Appl Energy 151:227–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kummu M, de MH, Porkka M, Siebert S, Varis O, Ward PJ (2012) Lost food, wasted resources: global food supply chain losses and their impacts on freshwater, cropland, and fertiliser use. Sci Total Environ 438:477–489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan TH, Pleissner D et al (1995) Techno economic analysis of a food waste valorization process via microalgae cultivation and co-production of plasticizer, lactic acid and animal feed from algal biomass and food waste. Bioresour Technol 198:292–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavromichalis I (2013) Six industrial by-products for liquid feeding pigs, 26 Aug. http://www.wattagnet.com/articles/16798-six-industrial-by-products-for-liquid-feeding-pigs. Accessed Oct 2016

  • OECD/FAO (2016) OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2016–2025 OECD Publishing, Paris. https://doi.org/10.1787/agr_outlook-2016-en. Accessed Nov 2016

  • Perry RH, Green DW (2008) Process economics, Chapter 9. In: Perry’s chemical engineers’ handbook, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • REGULATION (EC) No 1069/2009 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 21 October 2009 laying down health rules as regards animal by-products and derived products not intended for human consumption and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1774/2002 (Animal by-products Regulation)

    Google Scholar 

  • San Martin D, Ramos S, Zufia J (2016) Valorisation of food waste to produce new raw materials for animal feed. Food Chem 198:68–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stenmarck A, Jensen C, Quested T, Moates G (2016) Estimates of European food waste levels. ISBN 978-91-88319-01-2. https://www.eufusions.org/phocadownload/Publications/Estimates%20of%20European%20food%20waste%20levels.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016

  • United Nations (UN) (2015) https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/topics/sustainabledevelopmentgoals. Accessed Apr 2016

  • VALORLACT Project (2015) Layman report. https://issuu.com/aztitecnalia/docs/layman_valorlact_ing. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Wadhwa M, Bakshi MPS (2013) Utilization of fruit and vegetable waste as livestock feed an as substrates for generation of other value added products. FAO 2013. ISBN 978-92-5-107631-6. http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/i3273e/i3273e.pdf. Accessed Dec 2016

  • Wadhwa M, Kaushal S, Bakshi MPS (2006) Nutritive evaluation of vegetable wastes as complete feed for goat bucks. Small Rumin Res 64:279–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westendorf ML (2000) Food waste as animal feed: an introduction. Iowa State University Press, Ames, pp 3–16, 69–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiebe K, Lotze-Campen H, Sands R, Tabeau A, van der Mensbrugghe D, Biewald A, Bodirsky B, Islam S, Kavallari A, Mason-D’Croz D, Müller C, Popp A, Robertson R, Robinson S, van Meijl H, Willenbockel D (2015) Climate change impacts on agriculture in 2050 under a range of plausible socioeconomic and emissions scenarios. Environ Res Lett 10(08):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windsor ML, for the UK Department of Trade and Industry, Torry Research Station (2001) Fish meal. Torry Advisory Note No. 49 Published by FAO in partnership with Support unit for International Fisheries and Aquatic Research, SIFAR, Bibliographical information from FAO index page

    Google Scholar 

  • Woon KS, Lo IMC, Chiu SLH, Yan DYS (2016) Environmental assessment of food waste valorization in producing biogas for various types of energy use based on LCA approach. Waste Manag 50:290–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David San Martin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

San Martin, D. et al. (2019). Principles for Developing a Safe and Sustainable Valorization of Food Waste for Animal Feed: Second Generation Feedstuff. In: Preedy, V., Patel, V. (eds) Handbook of Famine, Starvation, and Nutrient Deprivation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55387-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55387-0_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-55386-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-55387-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics