Prehistory of Transit Searches

  • Danielle BriotEmail author
  • Jean Schneider
Reference work entry


Nowadays the more powerful method to detect extrasolar planets is the transit method, that is to say observations of the stellar luminosity regularly decreasing when the planet is transiting the star. We review the planet transits which were anticipated and searched and the first ones which were observed all through history.

Indeed transits of planets in front of their star were first investigated and studied in the Solar System, concerning the star Sun. The first observations of sunspots were sometimes mistaken for transits of unknown planets. The first scientific observation and study of a transit in the Solar System was the observation of Mercury transit by Pierre Gassendi in 1631. Because observations of Venus transits could give a way to determine the distance Sun-Earth, transits of Venus were overwhelmingly observed. Some objects which actually do not exist were searched by their hypothetical transits on the Sun, as some examples a Venus satellite and an infra-mercurial planet. We evoke the possible first use of the hypothesis of an exoplanet transit to explain some periodic variations of the luminosity of a star, namely, the star Algol, during the eighteenth century.

Then we review the predictions of detection of exoplanets by their transits, those predictions being sometimes ancient and made by astronomers as well as popular science writers. However, these very interesting predictions were never published in peer-reviewed journals specialized in astronomical discoveries and results.

A possible transit of the planet β Pic b was observed in 1981. Shall we see another transit expected for the same planet during 2018?

Nowadays, some studies of transits which are connected to hypothetical extraterrestrial civilizations are published in astronomical peer-reviewed journals. So we can note that the discovery of exoplanets is modiying in the research methods of astronomers. Some studies which would be classified not long ago as science fiction are now considered as scientific ones.


  1. Arnold LFA (2005) Transit light-curve signatures of artificial objects. Astrophys J 627:534–539ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baumgartner FJ (1987) Sun spots or Sun’s planets: Jean Tarde and the sunspot controversy of the early seventeenth century. J Hist Astron 18:44–54ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belorizky D (1938) Le Soleil, Etoile Variable. L’Astronomie 52:359–361ADSGoogle Scholar
  4. Borucki W, Dunham E, Koch D et al (1996) FRESIP: a mission to determine the character and frequency of extra-solar planets around solar-like stars. Astrophys Space Sci 241:111ADSGoogle Scholar
  5. Copernicus N (1543) De revolutionibus orbium coelestium. Johan Petreius, NurembergzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. Deeg H, Martin E, Schneider J et al (1997) The TEP network – a search for transits of extrasolar planets: observations of CM Draconis in 1994. Astron Astrophys Trans 13:233ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Doyle L 1985 Assisting extrasolar planetary detection through the determination of stellar space orientations. In: IUA Symposium 112, p 97Google Scholar
  8. Doyle L, Wilcox T, Lorre J (1984) The space orientation of stars. Astrophys J 287:307ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fontenelle BLB d (1686) Entretien sur la Pluralité des Mondes. Vve. Blageart C, Paris [English translation used here: (1803) Conversations on the plurality of worlds. translated by Gunning E, Cundee, London]Google Scholar
  10. Galilei G (1613) Istoria e dimostrazioni intorno alle macchie solari. Giacomo Mascardi, RomaGoogle Scholar
  11. Gassendi P (1632) Mercurius in sole visus, et Venus invisa Parisiis, anno 1631. Sébastien Cramoisy, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodricke (1783) A series of observations on, and a discovery of, the period of the variation of the light of a bright star in the head of medusa, called Algol. Phil Trans R Soc London 73:474–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hoskin M (1979) Goodricke, Pigott and the quest for variable stars. J Hist Astron 10:23–41ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huygens C (1698) Kosmotheoros: sive de terris coelestibus, earumque ornatu conjecturae. Den Haag [English translation: The celestial worlds discovered: or, conjectures concerning the inhabitants, plants and productions of the worlds in the planets. London]Google Scholar
  15. Kepler J (1619) Harmonices mundi. Libri V, LinzGoogle Scholar
  16. Kepler J (1627) Tabulae Rudolphinae. J. Saurii, UlmzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Kepler J (1629) Admonitio ad astronomos, rerumque coelestium studiosos, de raris mirisq[ue] anni 1631. Jakob Bartsch, LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  18. Kipping DM, Teachey A (2016) A cloaking device for transiting planets. Mon Not R Astron Soc 459:1233–1241ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korpela EJ, Sallmen SM, Greene DL (2015) Modeling indications of technology in planetary transit light curves-dark-side illumination. Astrophys J 809:139. (13pp)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kostov VB, McCullough PR, Carter JA et al (2014) Kepler-413b: a slightly misaligned, Neptune-size transiting circumbinary planet. Astrophys J 784:14. (18pp)ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lagrange AM, Gratadour D, Chauvin G et al (2009) A probable giant planet imaged in the β pictoris disk. Astron Astrophys 493(2):L21–L25ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lallemand R, Renard L, Servan B (1970) Sur une caméra électronique à grand champ destinée à la photométrie astronomique. CR Acad Sci Paris Dsérie B 270:385ADSGoogle Scholar
  23. Lardner D (1853) Hand-book of natural philosophy and astronomy. Walton and Maberly, London, p 771Google Scholar
  24. Lecavelier des Etangs A, Perrin G, Ferlet R et al (1993) Observation of the central part of the Beta-Pictoris disk with an anti-blooming CCD. Astron Astrophys 274:877–882ADSGoogle Scholar
  25. Lecavelier des Etangs A, Deleuil M, Vidal-Madjar A et al (1995) β Pictoris: evidence of light variations. Astron Astrophys 299:557–562ADSGoogle Scholar
  26. Le Verrier UJ (1846) Recherches sur les mouvements d’Uranus. Astron Nachr 25:85–92ADSGoogle Scholar
  27. Ledger E (1879) Transits of intra-mercurial planets. Observatory 3:251–252ADSGoogle Scholar
  28. Mayor M, Queloz D (1995) A Jupiter-mass companion to a solar-type star. Nature 378:355–359ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Napier J (1614) Logarithmorum Canonis descriptio. Andrew Hart, EdinburghGoogle Scholar
  30. Nowak M, Lacour V, Lapeyrère V, David L, Crouzier A, Schworer G, Perrot P, Rayane S (2017) A compact and lightweight fibered photometer for the PicSat mission.
  31. Perryman MAC (2000) Extra-solar planets. Rep Prog Phys 63:1209–1272ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Piggot E (1785) Observations of a new variable star. Phil Trans R Soc London 75:127–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rémy G (1945) Clarté sur la route. Casterman, Paris, p 41Google Scholar
  34. Schneider J (1994a) On the search for O2 in extrasolar planets. Astrophys Space Sci 212:321–325ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Schneider J (1994b) On the occultations of a binary star by a circum-orbiting dark companion. Planet Space Sci 42:539–544ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Strand KAa (1943) 61 Cygni as a triple system. Publ Astron Soc Pac 55:29–32ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Struve O (1952) Proposal for a project of high-precision stellar radial velocity work. Observatory 72:199–200ADSGoogle Scholar
  38. Tarde J (1620) Borbonia Sidera. Jean Gesselin, Paris. [French translation (1623) Les astres de Borbon et apologie pour le soleil. Jean Gesselin, Paris]Google Scholar
  39. Van Helden A (1976) The importance of the transit of mercury of 1631. J Hist Astron 7:1–10ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vaquero JM (2007) Historical sunspot observations: a review. Adv Space Res 40:929–941ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GEPI, UMR 8111, Observatoire de Paris, 61 avenue de l’ObservatoireParisFrance
  2. 2.LUTh, UMR 8102, Observatoire de Paris, 5 place Jules JanssenF-92195 Meudon CedexFrance
  3. 3.LUTH, Observatoire de Paris, PSL Research University, CNRSUniversité Paris DiderotMeudonFrance

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tsevi Mazeh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physics and AstronomyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations