Impact of Exoplanet Science in the Early Twenty-First Century

  • Hans J. DeegEmail author
  • Juan Antonio Belmonte
Reference work entry


The impact of exoplanet science at the beginning of the twenty-first century is studied from two different approaches: the impact in astronomical science both by professionals and citizen scientists and through public outreach. The impact of exoplanetology on the scientific community as well as on the informed public is presented by several indicators and examples. Currently about 3% of all refereed articles in astronomy are focused on exoplanets, whereas about a quarter of the science cases for very large multipurpose astronomical instruments is based on exoplanet science. Interactions with the public occur on several levels; we present an overview of exoplanet-related citizen science and discuss the influence of the public’s exposure to media coverage about exoplanets and life in the universe. This influence is changing the public’s perception about the uniqueness of our Earth and about the presence of extraterrestrial life. In turn, this perception affects the public support for the research infrastructure that is necessary to maintain the growth of the field of exoplanetology. Also, an interactive process between exoplanet science and the public through IAU’s NameExoWorlds Contest is presented in detail.


Exoplanetology Planetary systems Sociology of astronomy publications bibliography History and philosophy of astronomy 



We want to thank the Spanish institutions who supported the Cervantine candidature, notably for their kind offer to use all the relevant material produced for the IAU naming contest. HD acknowledges support by grant ESP2015-65712-C5-4-R of the Spanish Secretary of State for R&D&i (MINECO).


  1. Barentsen G et al (2017) K2 citizen science discovery of a four-planet system in a chain of 3:2 resonances. American Astronomical Society, AAS Meeting #230, id.118.10Google Scholar
  2. Boyajian TS (2016) Planet hunters IX. KIC 8462852 – where’s the flux? MNRAS 457:3988–4004ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dennis A (2016) Exoplanet observing by amateur astronomers,
  4. Drake F (1965) The radio search for intelligent extraterrestrial life. In: Mamikunian G, Briggs MH (eds) Current aspects of exobiology. Pergamon, New York, pp 323–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Drake F (2011) The search for extra-terrestrial intelligence. Phil Trans R Soc Lond A Math Phys Eng Sci 369:633–643ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frank A, Sullivan WT (2016) A new empirical constraint on the prevalence of technological species in the universe. Astrobiology 16:359–362ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gary B (2010) Exoplanet observing for amateurs, 2nd edn. Reductionist Publications, Hereford. available at
  8. Gozdziewski K, Maciejewski AJ, Migaszewski C (2007) On the extrasolar multi-planet system around HD160691. ApJ 657:546–558ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hessman FV, Dhillon VS, Winget DE, Schreiber MR, Horne K, Marsh TR, Guenther E, Schwope A, Heber U (2010) On the naming convention used for multiple star systems and extrasolar planets. 2010arXiv1012.0707HGoogle Scholar
  10. Jenkins JS et al (2017) New planetary systems from the Calan–Hertfordshire extrasolar planet search. MNRAS 466:443–473ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kissler-Patig M, Lyubenova M (eds) (2011) An expanded view of the universe: science with the European Extremely Large Telescope.
  12. Koziol M (2016) No one really knows how to name exoplanets. Naming new worlds is a confusing mess.
  13. Lyra W (2010) Naming the Extrasolar Planets. Boletim da Sociedade Astronòmica Brasileira 29(19):26Google Scholar
  14. McCullough PR et al (2007) A transiting planet of a sun-like star. ApJ 648:1228–1238ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pepe F et al (2007) The HARPS search for southern extra-solar planets. VIII. μ Arae, a system with four planets. A&A 462:769–776ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Petigura EA, Howard AW, Marcy GW (2013) Proc Natl Acad Sci 110(48):19273ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Schwamb ME et al (2012) Planet hunters: assessing the Kepler inventory of short-period planets. ApJ 754:129ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schwamb ME et al (2013) Planet hunters: a transiting circumbinary planet in a quadruple star system. ApJ 768:127ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Skidmore W (ed) (2015) Thirty Meter Telescope: detailed science case: 2015., document TMT.PSC.TEC.07.007.REL02
  20. Wright JT, Sigurðsson S (2016) Families of plausible solutions to the puzzle of Boyajian’s star. ApJ 829:1LADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de Astrofísica de CanariasLa LagunaSpain
  2. 2.Departamento de AstrofísicaUniversidad de La LagunaLa LagunaSpain
  3. 3.Departamento de AstrofísicaUniversidad de La LagunaTenerifeSpain

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tsevi Mazeh
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Physics and AstronomyTel Aviv UniversityTel AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations