Abstract
Leaders for IT can use integration, leadership, and organizational support frameworks to guide their planning or assess current conditions. This chapter introduces a number of useful frameworks for leading IT, provides a rationale for their use, and suggests how to put them into practice.
References
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2015a). Future ready framework. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Available at http://dashboard.futurereadyschools.org/framework.
Alliance for Excellent Education. (2015b). Future ready district assessment. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education. Available at https://dashboard.futurereadyschools.org.
Anandan, T., Cederquist, H., & McLeod, S. (2005). Principals technology leadership assessment. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research. Available at http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/resources/ptla.
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
Apple. (2008). Apple classrooms of tomorrow. Cupertino: Apple.
Arizona K12 Center. (2010). Technology integration matrix. Flagstaff: Arizona K12 Center.
Bloom, B., Englehart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., & Krathwohl, D. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York/Toronto: Longmans, Green.
BrightBytes. (2010). Clarity technology and learning surveys. San Francisco: BrightBytes.
CANLEAD. (2017). School technology leadership assessment. Available at http://learn.canlead.net.
Churches, A. (2010). Bloom’s digital taxonomy. Albany: A. Churches. Available at http://edorigami.wikispaces.com/Bloom's+Digital+Taxonomy.
Dexter, S. (2002). eTIPS-educational technology integration and implementation principles. In P. Rodgers (Ed.), Designing instruction for technology-enhanced learning (pp. 56–70). New York: Idea Group Publishing.
Dexter, S. (2005). Principles to guide the integration and implementation of educational technology. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of information science and technology (pp. 1250–1255). Hershey: Idea Group Publishing.
Dexter, S. L., Riedel, E., & Scharber, C. (2008). ETIPS: Using cases with virtual schools to prepare for, extend, and deepen preservice teachers’ field experiences. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 24(3), 77–84.
Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W., & Nash, J. B. (2016). Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation: A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation. In M. Young & G. Crow (Eds.), Handbook of research on the education of school leaders (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Florida Center for Instructional Technology. (2007). Technology integration matrix. Tampa: Florida Center for Instructional Technology.
Hanover Research. (2013). Technology integration frameworks for the K-12 curriculum. Washington, DC: Hanover Research.
Harris, J., & Hofer, M. (2009). Instructional planning activity types as vehicles for curriculum-based TPACK development. In C. D. Maddux (Ed.), Research highlights in technology and teacher education 2009 (pp. 99–108). Waynesville, NC: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education.
Hofer, M., & Harris, J. (2015). Developing TPACK with learning activity types. In M. Hofer, L. Bell, & G. Bull (Eds.), Practitioner’s guide to technology pedagogy and content knowledge (TPACK): Rich media cases of teacher knowledge (pp. 7-1–7-14). Williamsburg, VA: W&M Publish.
Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT – Replacement, amplification, and transformation – Framework. In C. Crawford, R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education international conference 2006 (pp. 1616–1620). Chesapeake: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Hutchison, A., & Woodward, L. (2014). A planning cycle for integrating digital technology into literacy instruction. Reading Teacher, 67(6), 455–464.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2000). Essential conditions. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2009). Standards for administrators. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2011). Standards for coaches. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2014). Lead and transform diagnostic tool. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2016). Standards for students. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
International Society for Technology in Education. (2017). Standards for teachers. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.
Kimmons, R. (2016). Technology integration. Provo: R. Kimmons. Available at https://k12techintegration.pressbooks.com.
Lemke, C. (2002). enGauge 21st century skills: Digital literacies for a digital age. Naperville: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
LoTi Connection. (2016). LoTi framework. Carlsbad: LoTi Connection. Available at https://www.loticonnection.com/loti-framework.
McLeod, S. (2015). Facilitating administrators’ instructional leadership through the use of a technology integration discussion protocol. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 10(3), 227–233.
McLeod, S., & Graber, J. (2018). 4 shifts protocol. Denver, CO: University of Colorado Denver. Available at http://dangerouslyirrelevant.org/resources/4-shifts-protocol.
McLeod, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2011). The dearth of technology leadership coverage. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 216–240.
Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.
Moersch, C. (1995). Levels of technology implementation (LoTi): A framework for measuring classroom technology use, online supplement. Learning and Leading with Technology, 23(4), 40–42.
North Central Regional Technology in Education Consortium. (1997). Learning with technology profile tool. Naperville: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2007). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning.
Porter, B. (2001). Evaluating student digital projects: Training and resource tools for using student scoring guides. Denver: B. Porter.
Puentedura, R. R. (2006). Transformation, technology, and education in the state of Maine. Available at http://hippasus.com/blog/archives/18.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.
Software and Information Industry Association. (2008). Vision K-20 survey. Washington, DC: Software and Information Industry Association.
Tucker, P. D., & Dexter, S. L. (2011). ETIPS leadership cases: An innovative tool for developing administrative decision making. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 6(5), 250–271.
U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Technology. (2014). Future ready. Washington, DC: United States Department of Education. Available at https://tech.ed.gov/futureready.
UNESCO. (2011). UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers, version 2.0. Paris: UNESCO.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
McLeod, S. (2018). Technology Integration, Leadership, and Organizational Support Frameworks for Instructional Improvement with Information Technology. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, KW. (eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_36-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_36-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7
eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education