Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Information and Communication Technology Dispositional Factors and Relationship to Information and Communication Technology Practices

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 308 Accesses

Abstract

Teacher dispositions reflect multiple internal factors that contribute to a teacher’s decisions/behaviors in any given situation. There have been many studies focused on which dispositional factors lead to teachers’ use of information and communications technology (ICT). Teachers’ integration of ICT has been assessed in a variety of different ways – as a teacher’s intention to use ICT, as the frequency of ICT use in the classroom, and/or as student-centered teaching practices with ICT. If a teacher’s dispositions (i.e., attitudes, perceptions, values) are reflected through his or her behaviors, then we need to ask an important question about ICT practices: What specific dispositions do teachers need to use ICT in their classrooms? This chapter reviewed empirical studies that examined four primary dispositions associated with teachers’ uses of ICT: self-efficacy, attitudes, pedagogical beliefs, and openness to change. This knowledge provides a robust starting point for answering more challenging and complex questions in the near future, such as: Why does a teacher hold certain dispositions, and how can we capitalize on that information to better support teachers in their actual use of ICT?.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agyei, D. D., & Voogt, J. M. (2011). Exploring the potential of the will, skill, tool model in Ghana: Predicting prospective and practicing teachers’ use of technology. Computers & Education, 56(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Awidi, H. M., & Alghazo, I. M. (2012). The effect of student teaching experience on preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration in the UAE. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 923–941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albion, P. R. (2001). Some factors in the development of self-efficacy beliefs for computer use among teacher education students. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 9(3), 321–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aldunate, R., & Nussbaum, M. (2013). Teacher adoption of technology. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 519–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Zaidiyeen, N. J., Mei, L. L., & Fook, F. S. (2010). Teachers’ attitudes and levels of technology use in classrooms: The case of Jordan schools. International Education Studies, 3(2), 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banas, J. R., & York, C. (2014). Authentic learning exercises as a means to influence preservice teachers’ technology integration self-efficacy and intentions to integrate technology. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30(6), 728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor, A. L., & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers & Education, 39(4), 395–414. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00075-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becta. (2004). Primary schools – ICT and standards. An analysis of national data from Ofsted and QCA by Becta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, C. K., Lauricella, A. R., & Wartella, E. (2014). Factors influencing digital technology use in early childhood education. Computers & Education, 77, 82–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blau, I., & Peled, Y. (2012). Teachers’ openness to change and attitudes towards ICT: Comparison of laptop per teacher and laptop per student programs. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 8, 73–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Celik, V., & Yesilyurt, E. (2013). Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Computers & Education, 60(1), 148–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chai, C. S. (2010). The relationships among Singaporean preservice teachers’ ICT competencies, pedagogical beliefs and their beliefs on the espoused use of ICT. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 387–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, R. J. (2010). Investigating models for preservice teachers’ use of technology to support student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 55, 32–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2016). Adoption of mobile devices in teaching: Changes in teacher beliefs, attitudes and anxiety. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 317–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R. (2002). Effects of technology integration education on the attitudes of teachers and students. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(4), 411–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2008). Self-report measures and findings for information technology attitudes and competencies. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 349–365). Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_21.

  • Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSantis, J. D. (2013). Exploring the effects of professional development for the interactive whiteboard on teachers’ technology self-efficacy. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 12, 343–362. Retrieved from http://www.jite.org/documents/Vol12/JITEv12ResearchP343-362DeSantis0374.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies of teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualizations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drent, M., & Meelissen, M. (2008). Which factors obstruct or stimulate teacher educators to use ICT innovatively? Computers & Education, 51(1), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K. E., & Rakes, G. C. (2010). Learner-centeredness and teacher efficacy: Predicting teachers’ consequence concerns regarding the use of technology in the classroom. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 18(1), 57–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, D. C., Ringstaff, C., Haymore, J., & Sandholtz, P. D. (1994). Apple classrooms of tomorrow. Educational Leadership, 51(7), 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A. (2005). Teacher pedagogical beliefs: The final frontier in our quest for technology integration? Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 25–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42, 255–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Addison, P., Lane, M., Ross, E., & Woods, D. (1999). Examining teachers’ beliefs about the role of technology in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 32(1), 54–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59, 423–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & Tondeur, J. (2015). Teacher beliefs and uses of technology to support 21st century teaching and learning. In H. R. Fives & M. Gill (Eds.), International handbook of research on teacher beliefs. Erlbaum (pp. 403–418). New York: Taylor & Francis-Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feather, N. T., & Collins, J. M. (1974). Differences in attitudes and values of students in relation to program of study at a college of advanced education. Australian Journal of Education, 18, 16–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flores, I. M. (2015). Developing preservice teachers’ self-efficacy through field-based science teaching practice with elementary students. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. (2007). An overview of dispositions in teacher education. In Dispositions in teacher education (pp. 3–29). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazzan, O. (2003). Prospective high school mathematics teachers’ attitudes toward integrating computers in their future teaching. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 35, 213–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden, H., & Rada, R. (2011). Understanding the influence of perceived usability and technology self-efficacy on teachers’ technology acceptance. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 343–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K. (2013). Risk-aversion: Understanding teachers’ resistance to technology integration. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 22(3), 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2013.802995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, S. K., & Gigliotti, A. (2016). Having a go: Looking at teachers’ experience of risk-taking in technology integration. Education and Information Technologies, 21(5), 1351–1366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9386-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. S. (2016). Examining current beliefs, practices and barriers about technology integration: A case study. TechTrends, 60, 30–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010a). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58, 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010b). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers & Education, 55(3), 937–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaca, F., Can, G., & Yildirim, S. (2013). A path model for technology integration into elementary school settings in Turkey. Computers & Education, 68, 353–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazu, I. Y., & Erten, P. (2014). Teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacies. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 2(2), 126–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, C. M., Kim, M. K., Lee, C., Spector, J. M., & DeMeester, K. (2013). Teacher beliefs and technology integration. Teaching and Teacher Education, 29, 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016). Toward a broader understanding of teacher technology integration beliefs and values. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 309–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knezek, G., & Christensen, R. (2008). The importance of information technology attitudes and competencies in primary and secondary education. In International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 321–331). Boston, MA: Springer. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_19.

  • Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101–111). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T. J. (2010). A systems-based approach to technology integration using mentoring and communities of practice. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 175–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T. J. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of the barriers to technology integration and practices with technology under situated professional development. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1109–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T. J., & Sullivan, H. (2007). Self-presentation bias in surveys of teachers’ educational technology practices. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(6), 627–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kopcha, T. J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., & Baser, D. (2014). Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures. Computers & Education, 78, 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawless, K. A., & Pellegrino, J. W. (2007). Professional development in integrating technology into teaching and learning: Knowns, unknowns, and ways to pursue better questions and answers. Review of Educational Research, 77(4), 575–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., & Lee, J. (2014). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs for technology integration through lesson planning practice. Computers & Education, 73, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2008). Teachers’ views on factors affecting affective integration of information technology in the classroom: Developmental scenery. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(2), 233–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, C. P., & Chan, B. C. (2007). MicroLESSONS in teacher education: Examining pre-service teachers’ pedagogical beliefs. Computers & Education, 48(3), 474–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S. H. (2011). Factors related to pedagogical beliefs of teachers and technology integration. Computers & Education, 56, 1012–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathipa, E. R., & Mukhari, S. (2014). Teacher factors influencing the use of ICT in teaching and learning in South African urban schools. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 1213.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrory, R. (2006). Technology and teaching: A new kind of knowledge. In E. A. Ashburn & R. E. Floden (Eds.), Meaningful learning using technology: What educators need to know and do (pp. 141–160). New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minshew, L., & Anderson, J. (2015). Teacher self-efficacy in 1:1 iPad integration in middle school science and math classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 334–367.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouza, C. (2009). Does research-based professional development make a difference? A longitudinal investigation of teacher learning in technology integration. Teachers College Record, 111(5), 1195–1241.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE). (2006). Professional standards for the accreditation of schools, colleges, and departments of education. Retrieved from http://www.ncate.org/documents/standards/unit_stnds_2006.pdf.

  • Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Glazewski, K. D., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2010). Teacher value beliefs associated with using technology: Addressing professional and student needs. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1321–1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Overbay, A., Patterson, A., Vasu, E., & Grable, L. (2010). Constructivism and technology use: Findings from the impacting leadership project. Educational Media International, 47(2), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Self and self-belief in psychology and education: A historical perspective. In Improving academic achievement: Impact of psychological factors on education (pp. 3–21). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S. C., & Franklin, T. (2011). In-service teachers’ self-efficacy, professional development, and web 2.0 tools for integration. New Horizons in Education, 59(3), 28–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petko, D. (2012). Teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and their use of digital media in classrooms: Sharpening the focus of the “will, skill, tool” model and integrating teachers’ constructivist orientations. Computers & Education, 58(4), 1351–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.12.013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. J. (2012). The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58, 449–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prestridge, S. J. (2014). Reflective blogging as part of ICT professional development to support pedagogical change. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(2), 70–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakes, G. C., Fields, V. S., & Cox, K. E. (2006). The influence of teachers’ technology use on instructional practices. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(4), 409–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritchhart, R. (2002). Intellectual character: What it is, why it matters, and how to get it. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadaf, A., Newby, T. J., & Ertmer, P. A. (2012). Exploring factors that predict preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies using decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 45(2), 171–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2010). Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education, 54(1), 103–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sang, G., Valcke, M., van Braak, J., Tondeur, J., & Zhu, C. (2011). Predicting ICT integration into classroom teaching in Chinese primary schools: Exploring the complex interplay of teacher-related variables. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27(2), 160–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, D. A., Baran, E., Thompson, A. D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M. J., & Shin, T. S. (2009). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) the development and validation of an assessment instrument for preservice teachers. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(2), 123–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulz-Zander, R., Pfeifer, M., & Voss, A. (2008). Observation measures for determining attitudes and competencies toward technology. In J. Voogt & G. Knezek (Eds.), International handbook of information technology in primary and secondary education (pp. 367–379). New York: Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9_22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Shifflet, R., & Weilbacher, G. (2015). Teacher beliefs and their influence on technology use: A case study. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 368–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiue, Y. M. (2007). Investigating the sources of teachers’ instructional technology use through the decomposed theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 36(4), 425–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Valcke, M., & Van Braak, J. (2008). A multidimensional approach to determinants of computer use in primary education: Teacher and school characteristics. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(6), 494–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2008.00285.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., Devos, G., Houtte, M. V., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2009). Understanding structural and cultural school characteristics in relation to educational change: The case of ICT integration. Educational Studies, 35(2), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055690902804349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2016). Understanding the relationship between teachers’ pedagogical beliefs and technology use in education: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. Educational Technology Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9481-2.

  • Trochim, W. M., & Donnelly, J. P. (2008). Research methods knowledge base (3rd ed.). Mason: Atomic Dog Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turel, V. (2014). Teachers’ computer self-efficacy and their use of educational technology. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 15(4), 130–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2016). Future ready learning reimagining the role of technology in education. Retrieved from http://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf.

  • van Braak, J., van Tondeur, J., & Valcke, M. (2004). Explaining different types of computer use among primary school teachers. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 19(4), 407. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vannatta, R. A., & Fordham, N. (2004). Teacher dispositions as predictors of classroom technology use. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 36(3), 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2004.10782415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (1996). A model of the antecedents of perceived ease of use: Development and test. Decision Sciences, 27(3), 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasicsko, M. M. (2007). The perceptual approach to teacher dispositions. In Dispositions in teacher education (p. 53). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, F. C., & Pitts, R. E. (2010). Significant issues in defining and assessing teacher dispositions. The Teacher Educator, 45, 179–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2007). Key design factors in durable instructional technology professional development. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(1), 101–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yagci, M. (2016). Effects of pre-service information technologies (IT) teachers’ thinking styles on their use of information and communication technology (ICT). Educational Research and Reviews, 11(2), 48–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yusop, F. D. (2015). A dataset of factors that influence preservice teachers’ intentions to use web 2.0 technologies in future teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(5), 1075–1080.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 981–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instructional Systems Technology Department, School of Education, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA

    Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich

  2. Learning, Design, and Technology, Department of Career and Information Studies, School of Education, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA

    Theodore J. Kopcha

  3. Learning Design and Technology, School of Education, Purdue University, Littleton, CO, USA

    Peggy A. Ertmer

Authors
  1. Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Theodore J. Kopcha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Peggy A. Ertmer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Joke Voogt

  2. University of North Texas , Denton, Texas, USA

    Gerald Knezek

  3. University of North Texas , Denton, Texas, USA

    Rhonda Christensen

  4. University of Otago , Dunedin, New Zealand

    Kwok-Wing Lai

Section Editor information

  1. University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

    Gerald Knezek

  2. University of North Texas, Denton, Texas, USA

    Rhonda Christensen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A.T., Kopcha, T.J., Ertmer, P.A. (2018). Information and Communication Technology Dispositional Factors and Relationship to Information and Communication Technology Practices. In: Voogt, J., Knezek, G., Christensen, R., Lai, KW. (eds) Second Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education . Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_27-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_27-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-53803-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation