Empathy Driving Engaged Sustainability in Enterprises

Rooting Human Actions in Systems Thinking
Living reference work entry

Abstract

This chapter suggests a vision for human activities in enterprises through the lens of engaged sustainability. We put together some important bits and pieces of insights and wisdoms that some seers among us have been able to envision. In the process we discuss empathy, emotional intelligence, social intelligence, and ecological intelligence and apply these ideas to learning organizations.

If human needs and wants were to be expressed and fulfilled only in material terms, humanity will not be able to recover the beleaguered Earth these have inflicted. If it is going to be business as usual, the unintended consequences which human actions have caused would destroy everyone. Here we attempt to understand the underlying empathetic nature of human beings that seem to “naturally” point towards giving rise to saner voices and enduring solutions.

We take the view that recovering from the impediments we face in shaping a sustainable future will not be possible if we continue to ignore the “softer” aspects of personal nature and superior interpersonal interaction humans are privy to. This chapter aims to understand whether achieving such feat can be made possible by grooming our empathetic skills in a more mindful and conscious manner. To that end, the concept of learning organizations has been applied to enhance the developmental skills across enterprises. We suggest that all enterprises, institutions, and organizations, irrespective of whether governmental, corporate, or voluntary, could embrace systemic changes to pay respect to the biospheric systems in a manner that would reverse the damage done while ensuring that the needs of future generations are respected and upheld.

Keywords

Empathy Engaged sustainability Learning organizations Ecological intelligence Social intelligence Emotional intelligence 

References

  1. Berry, W. (2009). Bringing it to the table: On farming and food. Berkeley: Counterpoint.Google Scholar
  2. Bonnett, M. (2017). Sustainability and human being: Towards the center of authentic education. In B. Jickling & S. Sterling (Eds.), Post-sustainability and environmental education: Remaking education for the future. Cham: Palgravee Mcmillan.Google Scholar
  3. Brown, B. (2012). Daring greatly: How the courage to be vulnerable transforms the way we live, love, parent and lead. New York: Gotham Books.Google Scholar
  4. Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking, systems practice. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  6. Goleman, D. (2004). In Forward to Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., Walberg, H. J. (Eds.), Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goleman, D. (2006). Social intelligence: The new science of human relationships. New York: Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  8. Goleman, D. (2010). Ecological intelligence: The coming age of radical transparency. Camberwell: Penguin.Google Scholar
  9. Goleman, D., & Ekman, P. (2007). Three kinds of empathy: Cognitive, emotional compassionate. http://www.danielgoleman.info/three-kinds-of-empathy-cognitive-emotional-compassionate/
  10. Goleman, D., Bennett, L., & Barlow, Z. (2012). Ecoliterate: How educators are cultivating emotional, social, and ecological intelligence. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. (Amazon Kindle e-book).Google Scholar
  11. Gore, A. (2006). An inconvenient truth: The planetary emergency of global warming and what we can do about it. New York: Rodale.Google Scholar
  12. Lakin, J. L. (2006). Automatic cognitive processes and nonverbal communication. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The sage handbook of nonverbal communication. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Lipton, B. (2005). Biology of belief: Unleashing the power of consciousness, matter and miracles. New York: Hayhouse.Google Scholar
  14. Nadeau, R. L. (2006). The environmental endgame: Mainstream economics, ecological disaster and human survival. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Pinker, S. (2002). The black slate: The modern denial of human nature. NewYork: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å, Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., Lenton, T. M., Scheffer, M., Folke, C., Schellnhuber, H., Nykvist, B., De Wit, C. A., Hughes, T., van der Leeuw, S., Rodhe, H., Sörlin, S., Snyder, P.K., Costanza, R., Svedin, U., Falkenmark, M., Karlberg, L., Corell, R. W., Fabry, V. J., Hansen, J., Walker, B., Liverman, D., Richardson, K., Crutzen, P., Foley, J. (2009, November 18). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Retrieved September 27, 2017, from https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art32/.
  17. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  18. Senge, P. M., Kleiner, A., Roberts, C., Ross, R. B., & Smith, B. J. (1994). The fifth discipline fieldbook: Strategies and tools for building a learning organization. New York: Currency, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  19. Tucker, M. E., & Williams, D. R. (2007). Buddhism and ecology: The interconnection of dharma and deeds. Cambridge: International Society for Science and Religion.Google Scholar
  20. Wispe, L. (1991). The psychology of sympathy. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Justice K. S. Hegde Institute of ManagementNitte UniversityNitteIndia

Personalised recommendations