Skip to main content

Centers Participating in Multicenter Trials

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials

Abstract

Successful conduct of multicenter trials requires many different types of activities, implemented by different types of centers. Resource centers are those involved in planning the trial protocol, overseeing trial conduct, and analyzing and interpreting trial data. They include clinical and data coordinating centers, reading centers, central laboratories, and others. Clinical centers prepare for the trial at their setting and accrue, treat, and follow up study participants. Each center has specific responsibilities, which are tied to the trial phase and wax and wan over the course of the trial. Activities during the planning phase are mostly the purview of the clinical and data coordinating centers, which are responsible for obtaining funding and designing a trial that will answer the specific research question being asked. The initial design phase and the protocol development and implementation phase see both resource centers and clinical centers making preparations for the trial to be conducted. The main responsibilities of clinical centers during the participant recruitment, treatment, and follow-up phases are to recruit, randomize, treat, and follow study participants and collect and transmit study data to the data coordinating center. The resource centers manage drug or device distribution, receive and manage data, and monitor trial progress. Clinical centers complete closeout visits during the participant closeout phase, while resource centers complete final data management activities, data analysis, and interpretation. The termination phase finds investigators from all centers involved in manuscript writing activities. Collaboration among all centers during all phases is essential for the successful completion of any multicenter trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad HA, Gottlieb K, Hussain F (2016) The 2 + 1 paradigm: an efficient algorithm for central reading of Mayo endoscopic subscores in global multicenter phase 3 ulcerative colitis clinical trials. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 4(1):35–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Alamercery Y, Wilkins P, Karrison T (1986) Functional equality of coordinating centers in a multicenter clinical trial. Experience of the International Mexiletine and Placebo Antiarrhythmic Coronary Trial (IMPACT). Control Clin Trials 7(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry MJ, Andriole GL, Culkin DJ, Fox SH, Jones KM, Carlyle MH, Wilt TJ (2013) Ascertaining cause of death among men in the prostate cancer intervention versus observation trial. Clin Trials 10(6):907–914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck RW (2002) Clinical research in pediatric ophthalmology: the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 13(5):337–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenstein BA, James KE, Lind BK, Mitchell HE (1995) Functions and organization of coordinating centers for multicenter studies. Control Clin Trials 16(2 Suppl):4s–29s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan EC (1983) The Coronary Drug Project. Role and methods of the Drug Procurement and Distribution Center. Control Clin Trials 4(4):409–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canner PL, Gatewood LC, White C, Lachin JM, Schoenfield LJ (1987) External monitoring of a data coordinating center: experience of the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Control Clin Trials 8(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrick B, Tennyson M, Lund B (2005) Managing a blood repository for use by multiple ancillary studies in the Women’s Health Initiative. Clin Trials 2(Suppl 1):S73

    Google Scholar 

  • Chauvie S, Biggi A, Stancu A, Cerello P, Cavallo A, Fallanca F, Ficola U, Gregianin M, Guerra UP, Chiaravalloti A, Schillaci O, Gallamini A (2014) WIDEN: a tool for medical image management in multicenter clinical trials. Clin Trials 11(3):355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung KC, Song JW (2010) A guide to organizing a multicenter clinical trial. Plast Reconstr Surg 126(2):515–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper GR, Haff AC, Widdowson GM, Bartsch GE, DuChene AG, Hulley SB (1986) Quality control in the MRFIT local screening and clinic laboratory. Control Clin Trials 7(3 Suppl):158s–165s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danis RP (2009) The clinical site-reading center partnership in clinical trials. Am J Ophthalmol 148(6):815–817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davey J (1994) Managing clinical laboratory data flow. Drug Inf J 28:397–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis JM (1994) Current reporting methods for laboratory data at Zeneca Pharmaceuticals. Drug Inf J 28:403–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desiderio LM, Jaramillo SA, Felton D, Andrews LA, Espeland MA, Tan JC, Bryan NR, Perry J, Liu DF (2006) A multi-institutional imaging network: application to Women’s Health Initiative Memory Study. Clin Trials 3(2):193–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijkman JHM, Queron J (1994) Feasibility of Europe-wide specimen shipments. Drug Inf J 28:385–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinnett EM, Mungall MM, Kent JA, Ronald ES, Gaw A (2004) Closing out a large clinical trial: lessons from the prospective study of pravastatin in the elderly at risk (PROSPER). Clin Trials 1(6):545–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Domalpally A, Danis R, Agron E, Blodi B, Clemons T, Chew E (2016) Evaluation of geographic atrophy from color photographs and fundus autofluorescence images: Age-Related Eye Disease Study 2 report number 11. Ophthalmology 123(11):2401–2407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dording CM, Dalton ED, Pencina MJ, Fava M, Mischoulon D (2012) Comparison of academic and nonacademic sites in multi-center clinical trials. J Clin Psychopharmacol 32(1):65–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrell B (1998) Efficient management of randomised controlled trials: nature or nurture. BMJ 317(7167):1236–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiss AL, McCoy SW, Bartlett DJ, Chiarello LA, Palisano RJ, Stoskopf B, Jeffries L, Yocum A, Wood A (2010) Sharing of lessons learned from multisite research. Pediatr Phys Ther 22(4): 408–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franzosi MG, Bonfanti I, Garginale AP, Nicolis E, Santoro E, N. Investigators (1996) The role of a regional data coordinating centre (RDCC) in a multi-national large phase-II trial. Control Clin Trials 17(Suppl 2S):104S–105S

    Google Scholar 

  • Fye CL, Gagne WH, Raisch DW, Jones MS, Sather MR, Buchanan SL, Chacon FR, Garg R, Yusuf S, Williford WO (2003) The role of the pharmacy coordinating center in the DIG trial. Control Clin Trials 24(6 Suppl):289s–297s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassman JJ, Owen WW, Kuntz TE, Martin JP, Amoroso WP (1995) Data quality assurance, monitoring, and reporting. Control Clin Trials 16(2 Suppl):104s–136s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glicksman AS, Reinstein LE, Laurie F (1985) Quality assurance of radiotherapy in clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rep 69(10):1199–1205

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldsborough IL, Church RY, Newhouse MM, Hawkins BS (1998) How clinic coordinators spend their time. Appl Clin Trials 7(1):33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman DB (1993) Standardized and centralized electrocardiographic data for clinical trials. Appl Clin Trials 2(6):34, 36, 40–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal AK, Pro B, Connors JM, Younes A, Engert A, Shustov AR, Chi X, Larsen EK, Kennedy DA, Sievers EL (2016) Response assessment in lymphoma: concordance between independent central review and local evaluation in a clinical trial setting. Clin Trials 13(5):545–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CB, Vogel V, Cummings SR, Held P, Fiedorek F, Lawrence M, Neal B, Reidies H, Santarelli L, Schroyer R, Stockbridge NL, Feng Z (2008) Do we need to adjudicate major clinical events? Clin Trials 5(1):56–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habig RL, Thomas P, Lippel K, Anderson D, Lachin J (1983) Central laboratory quality control in the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. Control Clin Trials 4(2):101–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hainline A Jr, Miller DT, Mather A (1983) The Coronary Drug Project. Role and methods of the Central Laboratory. Control Clin Trials 4(4):377–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris RAJ (1994) Clinical research aspects of sampling, storage, and shipment of blood samples. Drug Inf J 28:377–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins BS, Gannon C, Hosking JD, James KE, Markowitz JA, Mowery RL (1988) Report from a workshop: archives for data and documents from completed clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 9(1):19–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning AK (2012) Starting a genetic repository. Clin Trials 9(4):523

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrick LM, Locke GR 3rd, Zinsmeister AR, Talley NJ (2012) Challenges and lessons learned in conducting comparative-effectiveness trials. Am J Gastroenterol 107(5):644–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking JD, Newhouse MM, Bagniewska A, Hawkins BS (1995) Data collection and transcription. Control Clin Trials 16(2 Suppl):66s–103s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jellen PA, Brogan FL, Kuzma AM, Meldrum C, Meli YM, Grabianowski CL (2008) NETT coordinators: researchers, caregivers, or both? Proc Am Thorac Soc 5(4):412–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kempson RL (1985) Pathology quality control in the cooperative clinical cancer trial programs. Cancer Treat Rep 69(10):1207–1210

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiel DP, Magaziner J, Zimmerman S, Ball L, Barton BA, Brown KM, Stone JP, Dewkett D, Birge SJ (2007) Efficacy of a hip protector to prevent hip fracture in nursing home residents: the HIP PRO randomized controlled trial. JAMA 298(4):413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krockenberger K, Luntz SP, Knaup P (2008) Usage and usability of standard operating procedures (SOPs) among the coordination centers for clinical trials (KKS). Methods Inf Med 47(6): 505–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides TC, Babiker A, Singer J, Piaseczny M, Russo J (2004) Study conduct, monitoring and data management in a trinational trial: the OPTIMA model. Clin Trials 1(3):277–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin ME, Lorenzi GM, Bayless M, Cleary PA, Barnie A, Golden E, Hitt S, Genuth S (2012) Evolution of the study coordinator role: the 28-year experience in Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications (DCCT/EDIC). Clin Trials 9(4):418–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson GS, Carey C, Grarup J, Hudson F, Sachi K, Vjecha MJ, Gordin F (2016) Lessons learned: infrastructure development and financial management for large, publicly funded, international trials. Clin Trials 13(2):127–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JY, Hill A (2004) A multicenter lab sample tracking system. Clin Trials 2:252–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus P, Gareen IF, Doria-Rose P, Rosnbaum J, Clingan K, Brewer B, Mille AB (2012) Did death certificates and a mortality review committee agree on lung cancer cause of death in The National Lung Screening Trial? Clin Trials 9(4):464–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin DE, Pan J-W, Marticn JP, Beringer KC (2004) Pharmacy management for randomized pharmacotherapy trials: the MATRIX web data management system. Clin Trials 1(2):248

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride R, Singer SW (1995) Interim reports, participant closeout, and study archives. Control Clin Trials 16(2 Suppl):137s–167s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFadden E, Bashir S, Canham S, Darbyshire J, Davidson P, Day S, Emery S, Pater J, Rudkin S, Stead M, Brown J (2015) The impact of registration of clinical trials units: the UK experience. Clin Trials 12(2):166–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinert CL, Martin BK, McCaffrey LD, Breitner JC (2008) Do we need to adjudicate major clinical events? Clin Trials 5(5):557; author reply 558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melnyk H, Rosenfeld P, Glassman KS (2018) Participating in a multisite study exploring operational failures encountered by frontline nurses: lessons learned. J Nurs Adm 48(4):203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mobley RY, Moy CS, Reynolds SM, Diener-West M, Newhouse MM, Kerman JS, Hawkins BS (2004) Time trends in personnel certification and turnover in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study. Clin Trials 1(4):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moy CS, Albert DM, Diener-West M, McCaffrey LD, Scully RE, Willson JK (2001) Cause-specific mortality coding. Methods in the collaborative ocular melanoma study coms report no. 14. Control Clin Trials 22(3):248–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullin SM, Warwick S, Akers M, Beecher P, Helminger K, Moses B, Rigby PA, Taplin NE, Werner W, Wettach R (1984) An acute intervention trial: the research nurse coordinator’s role. Control Clin Trials 5(2):141–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nesbitt GS, Smye M, Sheridan B, Lappin TR, Trimble ER (2006) Integration of local and central laboratory functions in a worldwide multicentre study: experience from the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcome (HAPO) Study. Clin Trials 3(4):397–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi P, Hatch HT, Johnson G, Charboneau A, Pritchett J, Detre K (1987) Coordinating center follow-up in the Veterans Administration Cooperative Study of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery. Control Clin Trials 8(3):190–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perkovic V, Patil V, Wei L, Lv J, Petersen M, Patel A (2012) Global randomized trials: the promise of India and China. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(Suppl 1E):92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson M, Byrom B, Dowlman N, McEntegart D (2004) Optimizing clinical trial supply requirements: simulation of computer-controlled supply chain management. Clin Trials 1(4):399–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pogue J, Walter SD, Yusuf S (2009) Evaluating the benefit of event adjudication of cardiovascular outcomes in large simple RCTs. Clin Trials 6(3):239–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price MO, Knight OJ, Benetz BA, Debanne SM, Verdier DD, Rosenwasser GO, Rosenwasser M, Price FW Jr, Lass JH (2015) Randomized, prospective, single-masked clinical trial of endothelial keratoplasty performance with 2 donor cornea 4 degrees C storage solutions and associated chambers. Cornea 34(3):253–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prineas RJ, Blackburn H (1983) The Coronary Drug Project. Role and methods of the ECG Reading Center. Control Clin Trials 4(4):389–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rautaharju PM, Broste SK, Prineas RJ, Eifler WJ, Crow RS, Furberg CD (1986) Quality control procedures for the resting electrocardiogram in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial. Control Clin Trials 7(3 Suppl):46s–65s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rico-Villademoros F, Hernando T, Sanz JL, Lopez-Alonso A, Salamanca O, Camps C, Rosell R (2004) The role of the clinical research coordinator – data manager – in oncology clinical trials. BMC Med Res Methodol 4:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers A, Flynn RW, McDonnell P, Mackenzie IS, MacDonald TM (2016) A novel drug management system in the Febuxostat versus Allopurinol Streamlined Trial: a description of a pharmacy system designed to supply medications directly to patients within a prospective multicenter randomised clinical trial. Clin Trials 13(6):665–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld PJ, Dugel PU, Holz FG, Heier JS, Pearlman JA, Novack RL, Csaky KG, Koester JM, Gregory JK, Kubota R (2018) Emixustat hydrochloride for geographic atrophy secondary to age-related macular degeneration: a randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 125(10): 1556–1567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosier J, Demoen P (1990) Labeling of clinical trial samples: an overview of some regulatory requirements. Drug Inf J 24:583–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheintul M, Lun R, Cron-Fabio D, Krishtul R, Xue H, Lin K-H (2004) The challenges of designing a clinical research laboratory database. Clin Trials 1(2):219–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Shroyer ALW, Quin JA, Wagner TH, Carr BM, Collins JF, Almassi GH, Bishawi M, Grover FL, Hattler B (2019) Off-pump versus on-pump impact: diabetic patient 5-year coronary artery bypass clinical outcomes. Ann Thorac Surg 107(1):92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel D, Milton RC (1989) Grading of images in a clinical trial. Stat Med 8(12):1433–1438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sievert YA, Schakel SF, Buzzard IM (1989) Maintenance of a nutrient database for clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 10(4):416–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strylewicz G, Doctor J (2010) Evaluation of an automated method to assist with error detection in the ACCORD central laboratory. Clin Trials 7(4):380–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Submacular Surgery Trials Research Group (2004) Clinical trial performance of community- vs university-based practice in the Submacular Surgery Trials: SST report no. 2. Arch Ophthalmol 122:857–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun JK, Jampol LM (2019) The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) and its contributions to the treatment of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmic Res 62:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taekman JM, Stafford-Smith M, Velazquez EJ, Wright MC, Phillips-Bute BG, Pfeffer MA, Sellers MA, Pieper KS, Newman MF, Van de Werf F, Diaz R, Leimberger J, Califf RM (2010) Departures from the protocol during conduct of a clinical trial: a pattern from the data record consistent with a learning curve. Qual Saf Health Care 19(5):405–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth CA, Decroos FC, Ying GS, Stinnett SS, Heydary CS, Burns R, Maguire M, Martin D, Jaffe GJ (2015) Identification of fluid on optical coherence tomography by treating ophthalmologists versus a reading center in the comparison of age-related macular degeneration treatments trials. Retina 35(7):1303–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner G, Lisook AB, Delman DP (1987) FDA’s conduct, review, and evaluation of inspections of clinical investigators. Drug Inf J 21(2):117–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson M (1994) Carrier requirements for laboratory samples. Drug Inf J 28:381–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williford WO, Krol WF, Bingham SF, Collins JF, Weiss DG (1995) The multicenter clinical trials coordinating center statistician: more than a consultant. Am Stat 49(2):221–225

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta W. Scherer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Scherer, R.W., Hawkins, B.S. (2020). Centers Participating in Multicenter Trials. In: Piantadosi, S., Meinert, C. (eds) Principles and Practice of Clinical Trials. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52677-5_30-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52677-5_30-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-52677-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-52677-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MathematicsReference Module Computer Science and Engineering

Publish with us

Policies and ethics