Skip to main content

Why and When I Do Prefer the Dearterialization of Hemorrhoids and Mucopexy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Hemorrhoids

Part of the book series: Coloproctology ((COLOPROCT))

  • 87 Accesses

Abstract

Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization represents a valid treatment for second- and third-degree hemorrhoids. Its introduction 20 years ago, followed by many technical adjustments and improvements, brought an important “non-excisional” option to resolve a frequent proctological problem. Starting from the anatomic, physiologic, and physiopathologic knowledges of the hemorrhoidal disease, associated with the evaluation of the encouraging results obtained, many surgeons have been starting to identify this technique as an optimal compromise because of the patient’s satisfaction and the reduction of postoperative pain, associated with acceptable long-term recurrence rate when compared with other “milestones” techniques. An important step to obtain worldwide acceptance has been done when evaluating the efficacy of the technique in selected degrees of hemorrhoids: if at the beginning of the experience the data were obtained regardless of the degree of the disease, then many trials started to select specific patients to obtain more homogenous results to better clarify the efficacy of the technique. The aim of this chapter is to briefly summarize the correct indications for this technique to obtain good outcomes and reduce the failure of the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Morinaga K, Hasuda K, Ikeda T (1995) A novel therapy for internal hemorrhoids: ligation of the hemorrhoidal artery with a newly devised instrument (Moricorn) in conjunction with a Doppler flowmeter. Am J Gastroenterol 90:610–613

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sohn N, Aronoff JS, Cohen FS, Weinstein MA (2001) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization is an alternative to operative hemorrhoidectomy. Am J Surg 182:515–519

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnold S, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Scheyer M (2002) Doppler ultrasound assisted hemorrhoid artery ligation. A new therapy in symptomatic hemorrhoids. Chirurg 73:269–273

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bursics A, Morvay K, Kupcsulik P, Flautner L (2004) Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study. Int J Color Dis 19:176–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Goligher JC, Duthie HL, Nixon HH (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, vol 5. Baillière Tindall, London, pp 98–149

    Google Scholar 

  6. Scheyer M, Antonietti E, Rollinger G, Mall H, Arnold S (2006) Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation. Am J Surg 191:89–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dal Monte PP, Tagariello C, Giordano P et al (2007) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease. Tech Coloproctol 11:333–338

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Giordano P, Overton J, Madeddu F, Zaman S, Gravante G (2009) Transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization: a systematic review. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1665–1671

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ratto C, Parello A, Veronese E, Cudazzo E, D’Agostino E, Pagano C, Cavazzoni E, Brugnano L, Litta F (2015) Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization for haemorrhoids: results from a multicentre trial. Color Dis 17:910–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trompetto M, Clerico G, Cocorullo GF, Giordano P, Marino F, Martellucci J, Milito G, Mistrangelo M, Ratto C (2015) Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement. Tech Coloproctol 19:567–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ratto C (2014) THD Doppler procedure for haemorrhoids: the surgical technique. Tech Coloproctol 18:291–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ratto C, Giordano P, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2011) Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) for selected fourth-degree haemorrhoids. Tech Coloproctol 15:191–197

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giordano P, Tomasi I, Pascariello A, Mills E, Elahi S (2014) Transanal dearterialization with targeted mucopexy is effective for advanced haemorrhoids. Color Dis 16:373–376

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lestar B, Penninckx F, Kerremans R (1989) The composition of anal basal pressure. An in vivo and in vitro study in man. Int J Color Dis 4:118–122

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Infantino A, Altomare DF, Bottini C, THD group of the SICCR (Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery) (2012) Prospective randomized multicentre study comparing stapler haemorrhoidopexy with Doppler-guided transanal haemorrhoid dearterialization for third- degree haemorrhoids. Color Dis 14:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Giordano P, Nastro P, Davies A, Gravante G (2011) Prospective evaluation of stapled haemorrhoidopexy versus transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation for stage II and III haemorrhoids: three-year outcomes. Tech Coloproctol 15:67–73

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Leardi S, Pessia B, Mascio M, Piccione F, Schietroma M, Pietroletti R (2016) Doppler-guided transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (DG-THD) versus stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) in the treatment of third-degree hemorrhoids: clinical results at short and long-term follow- up. J Gastrointest Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-016-3220-1

  18. Cheetham MJ, Mortensen NJM, Nystrom P-O, Kamm MA, Phillips RKS (2000) Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 356:730–733

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Molloy RG, Kingsmore D (2000) Life threatening pelvic sepsis after stapled haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 355:810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Maw A, Eu KW, Seow-Choen F (2002) Retroperitoneal sepsis complicating stapled hemorrhoidectomy. Report of a case and review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum 45:826–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ratto C, Donisi L, Parello A, Litta F, Doglietto GB (2010) Evaluation of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization as a minimally invasive therapeutic approach to hemorrhoids. Dis Colon Rectum 53:803–811

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zampieri N, Castellani R, Andreoli R, Geccherle R (2012) Long-term results and quality of life in patients treated with haemorrhoidectomy using two different techniques: ligasure versus transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization. Am J Surg 204:684–688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Enrico Merolla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Merolla, E., Scotto, B., Piccoli, M. (2018). Why and When I Do Prefer the Dearterialization of Hemorrhoids and Mucopexy. In: Ratto, C., Parello, A., Litta, F. (eds) Hemorrhoids. Coloproctology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51989-0_36-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51989-0_36-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-51989-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-51989-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics