Advertisement

Tin Shed Science: Girls, Aesthetics, and Permeable Learning

  • Lucinda McKnight
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

This chapter provides a partial account of an intimate case study of an after-school science club for young girls in a garden shed in suburban Melbourne, Australia. While hybrid learning spaces merging home and school have been described before (Moje, Ciechanowski, Kramer, Ellis, Carrillo, and Collazo, Reading Research Quarterly 39(1):38–70, 2004), particularly in relation to girls and science (Barton, Tan, & Rivet, American Educational Research Journal 45(1): 68–103, 2008), such descriptions are limited to the hybridity of discourses and do not acknowledge the aesthetic, material, or sensuous dimensions of scholarship. Instead, the study on which this chapter is based involves diffractive artworks taking place notionally some years “after” the science club, forming this chapter assemblage.

The chapter combines images of the science club shed with further assembled fragments of original pedagogical intent via planning documents and other arts-based interventions by the organizer/writer. Emerging with this work is the concept of permeable learning, based on understandings that design is multiple and human intentionality as curriculum is a thin-skinned and fragile fiction despite humanist insistence, particularly in neoliberal contexts, that it is otherwise. Permeable learning incorporates intra-action (Barad, Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press, 2007) as both human and nonhuman entities merge, thus calling each other into being. So students and the gases they create and breathe in their experiments become new entities of indiscernible boundaries, as do school and home, art and science, mud and hands, public and private pedagogies, teacher and student, memory and experience, girl and bird, and shed and garden.

Keywords

Curriculum Pedagogy Permeable learning STEAM Gender Science Arts-based 

References

  1. Alaimo, S. (2008). Transcorporeal feminisms and the ethical space of nature. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 237–264). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alaimo, S., & Hekman, S. (2008). Introduction: Emerging models of materiality in feminist theory. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 1–19). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half-way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barton, A. C., Tan, E., & Rivet, E. (2008). Creating hybrid spaces for engaging school science among urban middle school girls. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 68–103.  https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207308641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Braidotti, R. (2013). The posthuman. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bristow, T. (2015). The Anthropocene lyric: An affective geography of poetry, person and place. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Campbell, D., & Fishwick, C. (2017, Friday 12 April). NHS and medical devices regulator tried to limit scandal over vaginal mesh implants. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/apr/21/nhs-vaginal-mesh-implants-scandal-suppress-media.
  9. Celikkan, E. (2014, 29 April). Female inventors from Turkey to race projects. Hurriyet Daily News. Retrieved from http://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/female-inventors-from-turkey-to-race-projects.aspx?pageID=517&nID=65687&NewsCatID=374.
  10. Coole, D. (2015). Lecture #4 Matter in place: A new materialist perspective. Berlin, Germany: Uferstudios. https://vimeo.com/165541933.Google Scholar
  11. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). Introducing the new materialisms. In D. Coole & S. Frost (Eds.), New materialisms: Ontology, agency and politics (pp. 1–43). London: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2013). New materialist ontologies in mathematics education: The body in/of mathematics. Education Studies in Mathematics, 83(3), 453–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dunne, J. (1993). Back to the rough ground: Practical judgement and the lure of technique. Notre Dame, IN: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ellsworth, E. (2005). Places of learning: Media, architecture, pedagogy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Frost, S. (2011). The implicatons of the new materialisms for feminist epistemology. In H. E. Grasswick (Ed.), Feminist epistemology and philosophy of science: Power in knowledge (pp. 69–83). London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frost, S. (2016). Biocultural creatures: Toward a new theory of the human. Durham, UK: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaztambide-Fernandez, R. (2015). Thinking beyond the Human. Curriculum Inquiry, 45(3), 245–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Helmsing, M. (2016). Life at large: New materialisms for a (re)new(ing) curriculum of social studies education. In N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S. E. Truman, & Z. Zaliwska (Eds.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies (pp. 137–151). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  19. Jesson, R. (2016). Porous learning: Using netbooks at home to enhance literacy learning. Retrieved from http://www.tlri.org.nz/tlri-research/research-completed/school-sector/porous-learning-using-netbooks-home-enhance-literacy.
  20. Kristeva, J. (1982). Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Landesberg, A., & Quatrale, L. (1996). See angel touch. In D. Coleman, E. Danze, & C. Henderson (Eds.), Architecture and feminism (pp. 60–71). New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  22. Larousse. (2017). Dictionnaires de francais. Retrieved from http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/s_%C3%A9crouler/27756.
  23. Lather, P. (2013). Methodology 21: What do we do in the afterward? International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 634–645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lather, P. (2016). Top ten+ list: (re)thinking ontology in (post)qualitative research. Cultural Studies Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Leavy, P. (2009). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  26. Masanauskas, J. (2017, February 17). City of Boroondara revolts on “welcome to country” ceremony. Herald Sun. Retrieved from http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/city-of-boroondara-revolts-on-welcome-to-country-ceremony/news-story/9455fe4f4300c81bcb2b1bd2910a6aa6.
  27. McKnight, L. (2016). Swimming lessons: Learning, new materialisms, Posthumanism and post qualitative research emerge through a pool poem. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2016.1220875
  28. McKnight, L., Bullock, O., & Todd, R. (2016). Whiteout: Writing collaborative online poetry as inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416673664
  29. McKnight, L., Rousell, D., Charteris, J., Thomas, K., & Burke, G. (2017). The invisible hand: Designing curriculum in the afterward. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1286406
  30. McKnight, L., & Whitburn, B. (2017). The fetish of the lens: Persistent sexist and ableist metaphor in education research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2017.1286407
  31. McWhorter, L. (1999). Bodies and pleasures: Foucault and the politics of sexual normalization. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Miles, M. (2014). Eco-aesthetics: Art, literature and architecture in a period of climate change. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  33. Moje, E., Ciechanowski, K., Kramer, K., Ellis, L., Carrillo, R., & Collazo, T. (2004). Working towards third space in content area literacy: An examination of everyday funds of knowledge and discourse. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(1), 38–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nesbit, E. (1906/2008). The Railway Children. Retrieved from https://www.gutenberg.org/files/1874/1874-h/1874-h.htm.
  35. Ono, Y. (2012). Hand piece. In R. Rugoff (Ed.), Invisible: Art about the unseen 1957–2012 (p. 36). London: Hayward Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Parikka, J. (2012). New materialism as media theory: Medianatures and dirty matter. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 9(1), 95–100.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14791420.2011.626252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pinar, W. F. (2011). What is curriculum theory? New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Prévert, J. (1972). Page d’écriture. In K. J. Goesch & K. R. Dutton (Eds.), Poèmes de France; an anthology of French verse. Sydney, NSW: McGraw-Hill Company.Google Scholar
  39. Rossetti, C. (1862/2017). Goblin market: Poetry Foundation. https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems-and-poets/poems/detail/44996
  40. Rotas, N. (2016). Moving towards practices that matter. In N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S. E. Truman, & Z. Zaliwska (Eds.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies (pp. 179–196). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  41. Sample, I. (2017, Tuesday 25 April). Plastic eating worms could help wage war on waste. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/apr/24/plastic-munching-worms-could-help-wage-war-on-waste-galleria-mellonella.
  42. Schubert, W. H. (2004). Foreword: Reflections on the place of curriculum. In Pedagogy of place: Seeing space as cultural education (pp. ix–xxv). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  43. Sefton-Green, J. (2013). Learning at not-school: A review of study, theory and advocacy for education in non-formal settings. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  44. Snaza, N. (2013). Bewildering education. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 10(1), 38–54.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15505170.2013.783889CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Snaza, N., & Sonu, D. (2016). Borders, bodies and the politics of attention. In N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S. E. Truman, & Z. Zaliwska (Eds.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies (pp. 29–42). New York: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Snaza, N., Sonu, D., Truman, S. E., & Zaliwska, Z. (2016). Acknowledgements. In N. Snaza, D. Sonu, S. E. Truman, & Z. Zaliwska (Eds.), Pedagogical matters: New materialisms and curriculum studies (pp. vii–viii). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  47. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Education and the posthumanist turn. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 1–14). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. St Pierre, E. A. (2014). Post qualitative inquiry. Paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education annual conference, Brisbane. http://www.aare.edu.au/publications-database.php/9609/Post-Qualitative-Inquiry.
  49. St Pierre, E. A., Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies – Critical methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708616638694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Tonkin, R. (2006). Leaf litter: Exploring the mysteries of a hidden world. Sydney, NSW: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  51. Tuana, N. (2008). Viscous porosity: Witnessing Katrina. In S. Alaimo & S. Hekman (Eds.), Material feminisms (pp. 188–236). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Uprichard, E. (2008). Children as ‘beings and becomings’: Children, childhood and temporality. Children and Society, 22, 303–313.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2007.00110.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Verizon Wireless. (Producer). (2014, 2 May, 2017). Inspire her mind- Verizon Commercial. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XP3cyRRAfX0.
  54. Williams, D. R., & Brown, J. D. (2012). Learning gardens and sustainability education: Bringing life to schools and schools to life. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Education, Faculty of Arts and EducationDeakin UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • David Rousell
    • 1
  • Dilafruz Williams
    • 2
  1. 1.Manchester Metropolian UniversityManchesterUK
  2. 2.Portland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations