Advertisement

Children Caring for the Australian Wet Tropics as a Response to the Anthropocene

  • Hilary WhitehouseEmail author
  • Neus (Snowy) Evans
  • Clifford Jackson
  • Marcia Thorne
Living reference work entry
Part of the Springer International Handbooks of Education book series (SIHE)

Abstract

The Wet Tropics World Heritage Area in far north eastern Australia is a unique place where tropical rainforests are internationally recognized for both biodiversity and cultural values. The chapter explores how children, advised and supported by their teachers and parents, in regional and rural schools intimately connected to these rainforests and associated aquatic ecosystems, are doing works of conservation and restoration, both as a response to the novel landscapes created by the rapidly changing environmental conditions of the Anthropocene, and as a personal contribution to caring for the Wet Tropics. Caring for country is an old discourse in Australia with its origins in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander cultures. Contemporary environmental education practice in Wet Tropics schools draws on these older concepts and those of ecological and social science to create a hybrid of understandings to promote practical means for caring for rainforest country. Interview data from children are presented in the chapter to illuminate in their own words their senses of care and connection to the Wet Tropics. Barriers and enablers to restorative practice are discussed in relation to dominant schooling practices, which continue to marginalize the work of caring, even though caring is a logical and necessary response to the Anthropocene. Children wish to actively care and are supported by adults to do so; however, many aspects of the formal, public school system in Queensland are not yet fully enabling of caring practice.

Keywords

Children Caring for country Wet tropics Anthropocene Agentic learning Relationality Barriers Enablers 

Introduction

We are helping to do our bit to stop global warming. I don’t think it can be stopped, but we can keep it at bay for a little while. It’s inevitable, but I’m a bit freaked out with global warming, because we’ve driven ourselves to a dead end. If we leave the planet in this state, then evolution won’t be able to start again, because we finally have the power to destroy ourselves. (Ten year old enrichment program participant interviewed by Clifford Jackson.)

The survival of the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area in tropical Australia is now partly dependent on its (human) children not only relearning to properly care for their rainforests and waterways but learning how to sustainably care for the novel landscapes of the Anthropocene (Collier & Devitt, 2016). The Wet Tropics stretches approximately 450 kilometers along the northern coastline of the state of Queensland and was listed on the World Heritage register in 1988 in recognition of its “outstanding universal value” and “the permanent protection of this heritage is of the highest importance to the international community as a whole” (Wet Tropics Management Authority [WTMA], 2017). Both cultural and natural values form the basis for World Heritage recognition as these rainforests are settled by one of the oldest, extant, human societies on earth.

Australian World Heritage rainforests are often positioned in tourism brochures and in Australian nature writing as “pristine” wilderness. Historically, they are nothing of the sort. These rainforests are very, long lived in country. Before European colonization, the Wet Tropics rainforests were one of the most populated areas of Australia and the only area where people lived permanently in rainforest (WTMA, 2017). A map of the distribution of people’s language groups is available from the Wet Tropics website (http://www.wettropics.gov.au/our-cultural-landscape). Within the Djabugay language, spoken by traditional people of the rainforest situated on the western slopes of Cairns, balmba means habitable country – or wet woodlands in European terms – and bama balmba translates to English as a person or people quite at home within these wet woodlands (Bottoms, 1999). For Djabuganydji people, “the forests have been a source of sustenance for thousands and thousands of years” (Djabukai Aboriginal Corporations [DAC], 2017).

Australia’s tropical forests can be viewed from a sociological perspective as a nature-culture (Whitehouse, 2011) as there have been tens of thousands of years of continuous human settlement. As culturally informed, tertiary educators, we favor drawing on the old and revitalized Australian concept of country for inquiring into concepts of education and care, for people can walk on country, learn on country, learn from country, and care for country. Caring for country is historically associated with the cultural practices of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and has been generally understood as a suite of highly sophisticated water and land management practices (Gammage, 2011) from which emerge many well-being, health, social, and economic benefits (Weir, Stacey, & Youngetob, 2011).

To understand care in an educational context, we draw on the work of Nel Noddings, who defines education as “a constellation of encounters, both planned and unplanned, that promote growth through the acquisition of knowledge, skills, understanding and appreciation” (Noddings, 2002, p. 283). Noddings’ (2005) own definition of care is relational and transactional: She writes that “in a caring relation or encounter, the cared-for recognizes the caring and responds in some detectable manner” and argues, “what we learn in the daily reciprocity of caring goes far deeper than test results.” Caring is a form of deep attention, what Noddings (1984) calls “engrossment.” Caring is receptive and reciprocal; the carer (child) receives what the cared-for (forest, river, reef, animal, plant) is feeling and trying to express. This opens the carer to motivational displacement. Noddings (2005) writes, “when I care, my motive energy begins to flow toward the needs and wants of the cared-for [and] n a caring relation or encounter, the cared-for recognizes the caring and responds in some detectable manner.” Philosophically, Noddings sees caring as a moral attitude that can be taught. This morality is “informed by the complex skills of interpersonal reasoning, that it is neither without its own forms of rigor nor somehow less professional than the calculated skills of formal logic” (Flinders, 2001, p. 214). Caring for country is being adopted much more widely across Australian society because it is such a generative, productive, and democratic concept. Within the complex idea of country is a very deep sense of relationality. People and country are close; people need country; country needs people. When we look at the forests and biomes of the Wet Tropics, we can say that the Wet Tropics needs people to care for it, and people certainly need the Wet Tropics.

We are four tertiary educators who work together with a deep, collective interest in social, scientific, and environmental sustainability education. In this chapter, we take up the sociological position of Malone (2011) who argues children are “subjected to the same social forces as adulthood, and children as social agents…can contribute to the reproduction of childhood and society through a variety of opportunities that are created in conjunction with adults, peer cultures and other children” (p. 476). We present views of caring in the words of children and illustrate the adult and peer leadership necessary to promote their agentic learning. Clifford Jackson collected the focus group interview data with 10- and 11-year-old children participating in the Cairns District Schools Science and Sustainability Enrichment Program, led by Sandra Charlton that involves students and teachers from the Queensland Government Department of Education and Training (QGDET) primary schools and colleges in Cairns and the Atherton Tablelands. Marcia Thorne collected focus group interview data with teachers and 15-year-olds in QGDET secondary schools and colleges in Cairns and the Atherton Tablelands. Neus Evans collected the document data of caring project materials available in the public domain and viewed artifacts created by children. Together we analyzed these data looking directly at caring practices in (and for) the Wet Tropics, and Hilary Whitehouse took carriage of writing this chapter.

Malone (2011, p. 466) advises that to “focus on children’s agency without considering structure is to overlook the fact that a person’s capacity to engage in an action and take it forward can only be realised if the established structure in which they are operating will support and accommodate those actions.” Current education policy in Australia is strongly influenced by globalization and neoliberalism (Smith & Stevenson, 2017) and follows an education agenda that generally serves the neoliberal marketplace over and above the needs of individuals and the needs of human and forest communities. Caring for country and education for environmental stewardship is not conceived as core to school curriculum in the Wet Tropics (Thorne, 2017). Educators can experience a persistent philosophical conflict between the effects of the neoliberalist paradigm of efficiency and productivity that dominates Australian curriculum and educational policy (Cuervo, 2016) and the other meaningful imperatives of education, such as preparing children adequately for life in the Anthropocene. Children, too, have to negotiate the same structural tensions. The Anthropocene, as a way for framing socio-ecological conditions, is an educational problem (Laird, 2017), and we can use dimensions of the concept to acknowledge “educated human agency’s power to change Earth environments for worse and for better, including its consequences for a place’s habitability” (p. 269), and this requires “educating children to develop nature-loving practices” (p. 275).

Schooling, the Anthropocene, and the Need for Care Work in the Wet Tropics

According to the influential Australian philosopher and ethicist, Clive Hamilton, the idea of Anthropocene was first conceived by earth system scientists to capture “the very recent rupture in Earth history arising from the impact of human activity” (Hamilton, 2016, p. 94). The Anthropocene is “not a continuation of the past but a steep change in the bio-geological history of the Earth” and what we now have to cope with is “not continuous change but rupture” (p. 100). Philosophically, the notion of rupture “invites a new understanding of the human relationship to the Earth” (p. 104). Some pockets of Wet Tropics forest, particularly those in the Daintree, have been extant for 120 million years, and such oldness is a source of wonder and awe. The youngest forests are 9000 years old. Yet, these resilient, persistent, biodiverse, and vegetable communities, from mountain forests to coastal mangroves, are at now extreme risk. Much of the landscape, particularly the aquatic ecosystems that meander from the Wet Tropics World Heritage Area through a myriad of agriculturally purposed and built environments to the Great Barrier Reef World Heritage Area, has been deliberately changed to meet the needs of growing human populations. George Skeene, a “descendent of the Yirrganydji, Wakaman and Birri Gia Tribes” (Skeene, 2009 p. 7), recalls the experiences in his youth in the Cairns region in the 1950s and laments the changes to his country (p. 51):

There was a small creek that came off the hills under Reservoir Road and through the farm. This creek was fed by a small spring in the mountains. Taro grew around this small spring. We would catch red bream, mud cod, jewfish, perch and freshwater turtle. Today this creek has been obliterated by development, which is called “progress”.

Biodiversity conservation is a priority for action in the twenty-first century (Perring, Audet, & Lamb, 2014) given the Anthropocene is marked by unprecedented human population growth and mass deterioration of habitats and loss of species. Individual children, teachers, local groups, schools, and their communities cannot readily or easily address international problems; however, practical forms of action at local and regional scales can have significant effects.

The case for action is that the Wet Tropics region is characterized by high endemism meaning the risks of extinction are predictably dire (Williams, Bolitho, & Fox, 2003). Broad-scale species loss is detrimental to remaining biological communities (Reside et al., 2017), including the human populations dependent on healthy ecosystems for the provision of life supporting services. Governments and policy-makers have long been aware of the effects of biodiversity loss on human health and well-being (see Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, 2009). But how adequately these identified concerns have been addressed through formal education is an open question. Our understanding of the Anthropocene is that the term gives shape and meaning to current conditions and imparts a sense of urgency to the task of transforming the purposes of education. Davies (2016, p. 2) writes that the idea of the Anthropocene (and the consequent terminal death of the Holocene) “provides both a motive and a means for taking a very, very long view of the environmental crisis. It gives the ecological upheavals of the present day their proper place in the history of the planet.” The national Australian Curriculum neglects to mention the Anthropocene and does not provide any overarching ideas or directions about the teaching for the Anthropocene. There are creative spaces within the Australian Curriculums learning areas (disciplines) and the cross-curriculum priority of sustainability (Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA], 2017). However, the sustainability cross-curriculum priority is precarious space as there is no mandated requirement in the national curriculum that any learning area be taught through this cross-curriculum priority (Salter & Maxwell, 2016). Our critique of the Australian Curriculum is that the whole document is predicated on the assumption that the global climate will remain stable, as it did in the Holocene, and that the purpose of formal education is to focus almost wholly on matters advancing human society.

In Queensland schools, the current obsession is with Australian Government education policy focused on improving standardized literacy and numeracy scores aligning with a larger global agenda. A regulatory testing regime called the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN), which began in 2008, is administered annually in May to children in years 3, 5, 7, and 9. Schools and teachers spend an inordinate amount of time conforming to this testing regime. Meaning, sustainability education in general and the wonderful projects children discuss in this chapter are marginal to normative school practice and can be considered quite unusual. When the truly dis/ruptive nature of the Anthropocene becomes undeniable and education leaders recognize that young people are going to need more than numeracy and literacy to overcome severe conditions, this is likely to change. Until then, a key performance indicator for Queensland schools remains the improvement of NAPLAN scores. The emphasis on standardized testing comes at the expense of teaching and learning for caring for country and for taking action on sustainability, environmental citizenship, and other worthy endeavors of formal education.

Marcia Thorne’s (2017) document analysis of five Year 10 subjects, English, Math, Science, Geography, and History, revealed less than 6 h of lessons in core curriculum subjects directly focused on sustainability and environmental stewardship out of the (approximately) 390 h of teaching time allocated to these five subjects across the Year 10 school year. Thorne (2017) conducted online surveys and research conversations with Year 10 teachers (n = 5) and Year 10 students (n = 126) in state secondary schools located in the Wet Tropics. She found that the participating teachers expressed concern for the natural world and saw the need for formal education to actively value learning to care for local environments (e.g., caring for country). Teachers interviewed saw the curriculum as “rigid” and teaching time as “pressed.” Similarly, students expressed concern for the sustainability of the Wet Tropics and worried that their generation will be left with a world full of environmental problems. Half were “deeply” worried by this thought, and 65% said that sustainability education should occur at school through targeted care actions and projects that encourage learning by doing. Students reported they did not know nor fully understood the extent of Anthropocene challenges, what mitigation is occurring, what adaption needs to occur, nor what role they could viably play. One teacher told Marcia, “the curriculum is very rigid. It’s hard enough to get through the specified lessons in order to get the assessment. I think [the school] would have to rejig in order to incorporate sustainability values more.” Another reported that there isn’t a “great deal happening. There might be the occasional mention of recycling or not using air conditioning when you don’t have to but [caring/stewardship] is not really something that has been emphasized in the school.” Poignantly, a third teacher summed up student interest in caring work as “It depends on how much they know about [the Anthropocene] and that would be limited by the fact that we don’t teach it.”

Learning /Caring Initiatives in the Wet Tropics

We shall now focus on what is being done to enable children’s care projects. Groups of educators in coastal and highlands regions in far north Queensland, who themselves have a strong sense of care, are initiating and supporting student projects that truly focus on caring for country. In 2013, the Cairns District Schools Science and Sustainability Enrichment Program (CDSSSEP) was started by Sandra Charlton, Louise Carver, Helen Underwood, and Annette Ryan, and 2014 was the first year of the program. Led by Sandra Charlton, the program involves students and teachers from Queensland Department of Education and Training primary schools and colleges. The initial program was centered on environmental networks established by staff at the Holloway’s Beach Environmental Education Centre (HBEEC), and subsequently the program is also offered by the Tinaroo Environmental Education Centre (TEEC). Both programs facilitate extracurricular science and sustainability enrichments for able and selected, preadolescent children in Cairns, Gordonvale, and towns across the Atherton Tablelands. Since 2013, 9- and 10-year-olds in Year 4 have been recruited to take part during their Year 5 studies as 10- and 11-year-olds. The children are nominated by their school principal and while in Year 4 complete an International Competitions and Assessments for Schools (ICAS) (UNSW Global Pty Ltd, 2017) science test Paper C (Year 5 equivalent) to gain entry. The top 15 students are offered places and once accepted into the enrichment program are challenged to develop small-scale sustainability initiatives and encouraged to seek advice from education and environmental professionals in the region – such as from the Cairns Regional Council, local Queensland Government Departments, Barron Catchment Care, Terrain NRM, Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority, Wet Tropics Management Authority, James Cook University, and local community organizations and businesses.

Cairns District Schools Science and Sustainability Enrichment Program (CDSSSEP) range of 1-year projects is truly inspirational (see Table 1 for a small sample from 2015). In most cases, the young children excel at recognizing the problem and identifying actions for solution. Despite their age and inherent lack of access to integrated resources, these children are no less interested in leveraging their ideas via the community into fully realized caring projects. The program is extracurricular and not usually undertaken as part of a school day. Children spend their own time on their projects. In some schools, the children meet with the teacher liaison of the school for 1 h a week and then work on the project in their own time. The children’s efforts are not graded nor assessed, and children’s two public presentations of their project’s results are viewed as an opportunity for the child to gain additional feedback about their project from people outside the program and project team. The children’s initiation starts with induction days into how to set up a sustainability project. The children attend excursions to both a nearby tropical island (Green Island) and a Wet Tropics aquatic ecosystem, the Barron River. Children indicated that their project ideas were inspired by their adult-facilitated experiences on county as these excerpts from focus group interviews show (gender, school, and year are de-identified for confidentiality). Given that children are the agents of their own learning (Malone, 2011), these data enable the enrichment program children to speak about their experiences and their decisions in their own words.
Table 1

Sample of student projects from the Cairns District Schools Science and Sustainability Enrichment Program (CDSSSEP) 2015 (Cairns Regional Council, 2015)

Project

Title

Collaborators

Brief description

1

When he saw the stream

Children’s authors

Mother

Student has researched in impact of litter on the rainforest, and she has written a children’s book to address this issue

2

Batman

Cairns regional council

Tolga bat Hospital

Student has researched the importance of the spectacled flying fox to our environment. He has investigated attitudes and knowledge of the general public and his fellow year 5’s. The student attended meetings as a member of the cairns regional Council’s flying fox advisory committee

3

Conservation 4 kids

Family

Student flagged the notion that the topic of conservation was considered by young primary school-aged students in a negative light. She scripted and filmed four short videos to address this perceived shortcoming. She conducted surveys with 5 year one classes before and after the screening of these videos and analyzed the students’ responses

4

Running in the right direction

Barron catchment care

Canegrowers Association

Mulgrave Landcare, and catchment group

Student researched and identified best management practices (BMP) sugar cane farmers are using to reduce sediment runoff. She surveyed cane farmers about their use of BMPs and interviewed a farmer about the barriers farmers encounter in reducing runoff

5

Protecting our marine life

CSIRO

Cairns turtle rehabilitation Centre

Cairns regional council

Student conducted litter surveys and water quality testing at four locations on Barron River catchment. He has created a reef Guardian household survey and proposed that ratepayers that meet or exceed specific litter targets be rewarded via a rates reduction or voucher. He was invited to join the Cairns City Council’s water advisory Board for the January 2016 meeting

The children in the enrichment program designed their own projects. A trip down the Barron River gave some of the children project ideas:

When I saw the Barron River, I thought, how would you feel if you were pouring a cup of water and then there was white dots full of washed out fertiliser in your water and that was what you had to drink, and I wouldn’t drink that. (Eleven year old)

When we were going down the Barron River there was a bank completely bare of mangroves. A very, very, very, clear example of shelf erosion, so I thought, hmm, maybe that has something to do with there being no mangroves. (Ten year old)

I got the idea because one day we went … on a boat ride down the Barron River. Then I saw Singapore Daisies [a declared noxious weed in Queensland] covering all the trees and it just looked horrible so I thought it was an idea to help stop the Singapore Daisies. (Eleven year old)

And the trip to Green Island combined also promoted an idea for a project:

I decided to go to … Goomboora Park… In the river, I saw a car admission ticket … and it was expired and it was just floating down the river and it was two days old. Then I thought going to Green Island I could make a ticketing system that doesn’t even require a ticket, it just requires your phone, you scan and you’re magically allowed on the boat. (Eleven year old)

And a keen observation of school grounds led to a project idea:

Well, I got the idea for my litter project because of all the litter around our school. For example, on the oval you can’t walk one metre without seeing at least one piece of litter on the ground. (Eleven year old)

Children’s location proximate to the Wet Tropics is an important consideration as is the location of the Great Barrier Reef, the other World Heritage area offshore from Cairns:

I wanted to do a project that I was inspired by, and I am honestly inspired by nature. So, it would either be the rainforest or the Great Barrier Reef. Living near the rainforest myself I chose to do [my] project on the forest and the area around it. (Ten year old)

We’re surrounded by ocean and rainforest [and] our litter impacts the environment very badly. I think the only way to stop litter is to educate people that it’s not right to do it because you might clean it up but there’s always going to be somebody who will keep littering and littering. So, during my project, I found and researched different ways to educate the community about litter. (Ten year old)

While litter reduction projects are tangible and meaningful, some children said they were motivated by the notion of a novel project, the idea that they could change the behavior of others, and the perception that they could make a positive difference:

I had several original ideas. I said to my mum, Ghost Nets. Not too sure about that one. Marine life? Yeah. Someone already thought of that. What about mangroves? Then mum started getting really excited, because it was something that would amount to a good project. Because I wanted to do something that no one had ever done before. That was very important to me. (Ten year old)

I’m interested in all varieties of environmental issues but mainly water problems, pollution in water. So, for my project I’ve built a few sediment traps around the school. I’ve measured the sediment that has been trapped and stopped from going into the Great Barrier Reef. (Ten year old)

Children view their endeavors as worthwhile, and some stated an intention to continue their projects beyond the program’s deadlines:

I am going to continue my project after this year. I’m going to continue it for as long as I can, because you – because once you’ve started something like this, you can’t just give up. (Ten year old)

The children were optimistic about making difference, though several were also realistic about the size and longevity of that difference. What emerges through all these data is that the children interviewed very clearly demonstrate an understanding of relationality between their social worlds and the world of rainforests and reefs. They exhibit compassion for animals and plants:

I created a little challenge for all the classes in the school. I would go around [to the classes] and the teachers would email [the teacher liaison the results and the class] with the highest percentage of students in their class with no litter or rubbish items in their lunchbox get a prize at the end of the next week. I think that really motivated my school to stop bringing rubbish to school and stop littering. When we announce the winners we also told them how all the litter kills hundreds of animals every single day. (Eleven year old)

I increased the awareness in Stratford [suburb in Cairns] about plastic bags and it definitely made a difference. My project was trying to reduce the amount of plastic bags used in the Stratford shopping area by talking to the owners of the shops just not to give a plastic bag on automatic. Ask if [customers] need it or if they have their own bag. (Eleven year old)

The most important thing for me was spreading the word around, because this is an awareness campaign. (Ten year old)

Enablers and Barriers for Children Doing Care Work in the Wet Tropics

Designing deep and meaningful learning experiences that reach beyond prescriptive numeracy and literacy classroom-based lessons is not easy on a number of levels. As Bowers (2011) notes, the crisis of the Anthropocene is not currently being addressed in formal education because so much of what is promoted in public (government) schools tends to reflect the thinking and actions that have promoted the very crisis we face. What is required is thinking and actions that respond to increasingly complex systems. Educators, at both the administrative and classroom level, who wish to respond to complex Anthropocenic systems are required to surrender false presumptions of control and instead exert trust, creativity, time, and energy. Our research with teachers and children who engage in caring for the Wet Tropics finds similar barriers to those provided by scholars elsewhere, including insufficient time and money. Understandably, school principals are preoccupied by consequences of neoliberal education policies that emphasize (and in some cases, punish and reward) performative excellence in education as decided on narrow, literacy and numeracy standardized test results. Educational activities that divert attention away from primary schools’ core business of literacy and numeracy can be seen as disruptive to progress. In this vein, far north Queensland schools have responded by defaulting to rigid, explicit instruction pedagogical models.

There is research that argues for the effectiveness of explicit instruction over other pedagogical models (Clark, Kirschner, & Sweller, 2012; Hollingsworth & Ybarra, 2009; Rosenshine, 2012), particularly for teaching numeracy and literacy skills. However, literacy and numeracy learning can also take place alongside or through works of conservation and restoration, with added positive wide-ranging results for school reputation, learning, learners, and their communities (see Archie, 2003). North American schools that use the local environment for learning report dramatic improvements in the quality of education, including improved academic performance overall and in standardized test results, student motivation, behavior and attendance, parent and community involvement, and assimilation of concepts and skills beyond numeracy and literacy. Learning for caring can cover a broad range of core curriculum requirements in English, Mathematics, Science, and Technologies alongside improving children’s capabilities considered necessary for the twenty-first century, including problem solving, communication, and critical and creative thinking.

For example, consider the work of Molly, who, as an individual (and not part of the CDSSSEP) at age 9, took action after learning about the consequences of plastic for marine ecosystems and animals. After considering a suite of possible actions, Molly decided to start a campaign to eliminate use of single-use plastic straws from all far north Queensland school canteens. Molly calls her campaign “Straw No More” and uses social media features across Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/StrawNoMoreProject/), Twitter, local radio, and a website (https://www.strawnomore.org/). Molly began at her own school first gaining support from the school principal and then the canteen manager and teachers. In less than a year, 16 other schools joined the campaign. Molly worked with local not-for-profit organizations, speaking on local and national radio and presenting at the local TedXCairns event. Clearly, Molly’s learning over the year extended far beyond school-based literacy and numeracy to develop her personal and social capabilities; critical, creative, and problem-solving skills; and personal growth alongside improving the ecological fabric of waterways that enter the ocean. Molly is planning to expand her campaign to local cafes and restaurants.

School leaders can choose to be enablers or disablers. School-based activities are bounded by the rules, regulations, and norms of the broader education system and community context. Principals who choose to enable conservation and restoration work can do so by actively supporting emergent initiatives and establishing democratic and trusting structures which, in turn, generate space for flexibility, creativity, and increased social capital. Although principals tend to report feeling constrained by systemic barriers imposed by educational governing bodies, they have discretionary power to use “leverage points” (Hjorth & Bagheri, 2006) within their spheres of influence. In one Wet Tropics school, the principal used her leverage to support teacher and student conservation and restoration work of local wetlands by creatively rearranging the school’s budget lines to enable the key teacher to have 1 day per week free of teaching to administer and organize this caring work. Another very important enabling practice is trust. Reciprocal trusting relationships between principals, teachers, students, and the local community are very important for advancing conservation and restoration work. Principals, teachers, and parents have to trust that ecological caring work leads to student lifelong learning rather than being tempted to focus on systemically valued and immediately measurable short-term goals and gains.

The barriers to children caring range from existential to practical. Children in the CDSSSE Program learned that their care actions were unusual, and their high expectations of community involvement were not met, discovering that others “do not care” or do not appear to care enough “to turn up”:

Well, it’s really amazing how much mangroves actually do for the environment, but no one seems to care. No one really seems to care about what they do for the environment. [Clifford Jackson: Why do think no-one cares?] Because they’re too caught up with their day-to-day lives and they don’t have any time to care about the environment. But some people, even though they are so, so, so busy actually find time to spare a thought for Mother Nature and help her out. (Ten year old)

Well one of my expectations was that when I held the big clean out of Singapore daisies at the front of Holloway’s Beach, I put a lot of effort into making the big flyers you put on parade and I saw my teacher and he put it on parade [too]. Then many people said they were going to turn up. But then when it came to the day, nobody turned up. It was only me, my friend, my parents and the Holloway’s Beach [Environmental Education Centre] crew. (Eleven year old)

CDSSSEP children realized that while their project idea was worthwhile, the practicality of completing the project was beyond their ability and also that the others on whom they had to rely were not always reliable or fully cooperative for differing reasons:

Yeah, I definitely would have liked to finish it, but I have no contact. I don’t know how I’m able to find the [High School] student that I worked with [on the coding]. He said he’s got some sort of office but he never told me about it, he never told me where it was and so I’m not able to finish the project at all. (Eleven year old)

[My project] wasn’t as successful as most of the others [projects]. Partially, since I had to work with younger children and their teachers, they were very busy, especially since had to get most of this done near the end of the year and that’s a very hectic time for most teachers. So, trying to get the surveys I handed out returned twice getting time to show the clips [child directed and filmed video clips on water conservation] to the kids was very difficult and half the surveys didn’t come back in time, so I didn’t actually end up finishing my project completely. (Ten year old)

The three main enablers identified by the children when interviewed about their care work were the direct assistance of parents, school educators, and environmental professionals. What we enjoyed finding in these data was the influence of the children’s mothers and fathers and their teachers and community supporters:

I was interested in the environment because of my Mum, she studies environmental education and stuff like that. I thought it would be a good idea [to do the project] because I could have support from her. She would know some stuff and I thought that would be good. (Ten year old)

Mum took me to the mangrove boardwalk to do a little bit of research [and] have a look - so many crabs. So, I’ve been at mangroves and I’ve done a lot of research. (Ten year old)

My dad just thought of it and I just went with him because I couldn’t think of anything else. (Eleven year old)

Mum has a Pozible account [https://pozible.com/], so she set up crowd funding platform on that. Mum again helped me spread the word about my survey that I made on Survey Monkey … via Facebook and her friends and the community choir. (Ten year old)

So one of my challenges at the start of the year was thinking of what project I should do. Luckily, I had some of my teachers help me out. One of my teachers said, “Remember the excursion to the Barron Gorge”. The water was basically red and she explained that it was sediment. So she said, “Why don’t you do your project on sediment?” and I went along with that idea and I found it really enjoyable. (Ten year old)

Biggest helper probably was [the teacher]. She kept me going when the going got tough. (Ten year old)

The person [who] got me started and going along the right track was Danora from the Cairns Regional Council. Second person was [JCU lecturer]. Being a teacher, lecturer person herself, she knows how to get through [to] people and know[s] how to get working. So, she was basically my little helper. (Ten year old)

Another significant feature to emerge from interviews was the concept of working at scale. Scale is a vital consideration for educators and their students involving themselves in positive actions (rather than ignoring or despairing about Anthropocene because the identified problems are global). Local scale, practical actions are realistic for young people who are well below voting and driving age:

Litter I think would be much easier to change other people’s perspectives and teach them about. Because climate change is such a large issue and even if one person stopped [contributing] it might not change much with the issue. But with litter, if one person stops, their suburb that they live in could get cleaner. (Ten year old)

Global warming, I know it can’t really be stopped, but we can halt the progress by doing little things. All those little things help. You know the saying a little drop of water in a big sea still makes a difference. That’s what we can do. Tiny, midget actions can still be used against global warming. (Ten year old.)

What emerges from these data is just how wise these young children can be, particularly in understanding the power of multiples when it comes to individual and local caring actions. We are very moved by these data and particularly the phrase that “tiny, midget actions” count.

Conclusion

The novel landscapes of the Anthropocene are the new normal. No child’s project can return developed country to any sense of wholeness associated with the conditions of past centuries. What the children are doing are enacting their own relational ideas of care, enabled and practically supported by innovative educators and involved parents. All projects concern raising awareness and reducing one or more human impacts on a Wet Tropics catchment or biome. Not one project involved taking peers outside to more directly “connect with nature” (Charles, Louv, Bodner, Guns, & Stahl, 2009), and this is very practical decision-making. For children in the Wet Tropics, the forests and rivers of Far North Queensland are safely accessed in the company of supervising adults like parents and outdoor and environmental educators. Coastal rivers hide very large crocodiles. Forests are alive with poisonous snakes, disease-bearing ticks and mites, biting insects, and stinging trees. And for half of the year, it’s incredibly hot. None of this lessens the meaning and impact of the children’s actions, for what underlies all these initiatives is both a strong sense of purpose and a strong sense of connection.

Children desire to take large and “midget” action to address environmental and sustainability issues in the Wet Tropics, while Queensland public education remains largely preoccupied with maintaining the education status quo and limiting student learning to “safe” experiences that can be measured and controlled. The children afforded participation in the extracurricular CDSSSEP are challenged to work with others and make a difference to their local community; however the program is limited to children with demonstrated high academic ability and with access to higher levels of social capital. Molly, who was not involved in the CDSSSEP, was supported by her own school and family. The key condition is that children receive full and meaningful, trusting adult support to keep them buoyant and optimistic.

I know that one thing is for sure, I know that I can never give up as you can [always] try some new ways to make a change. (Ten year old)

I think I can make a difference if I can get out the information from my survey to the relevant industries, companies or environmental groups … and basically tell the public, you guys are letting these poor animals die. Why don’t you know anything about them? Maybe they can start helping. (Ten year old)

Laird (2017, p. 268) writes that the Anthropocene will demand from all of us a “much deeper and broader rethinking of educational ends and means that take the myriad complex challenges of Earth habitation and habitability seriously, both locally and globally, with diverse children’s needs and situations explicitly in mind.” Children’s participation in the formal enrichment program on the Atherton Tablelands and in Cairns was enabled by a regional network of adults in possession of “a heightened sense of human agency’s consequences for the habitability of both the planet and children’s local environments, the places where they live, play, and learn” (Laird, 2017, p. 268). There is a concept of a “good” Anthropocene (or possible, plural, Anthropocenes), lit by a myriad of actions, large and small, all making positive and productive contributions toward creating a future that is just and sustainable (see https://goodanthropocenes.net). Whether our Anthropocene turns out to be “good” or dangerous for human societies, ancient rainforests (and their neighboring reefs), is going to be decided in the next few years. What we can rely on is human creativity ingenuity and care. And as with the CDSSSEP, within hybrids of formal and informal learning, caring educators and children will find the opportunity for change (Stevenson, Nicholls, & Whitehouse, 2017). What we show in this chapter is that when enabled by caring adults, children are agentic, they do care deeply, they possess relational systems thinking, and they value their Wet Tropics.

Cross-References

References

  1. Archie, M. (2003). Advancing education through environmental literacy. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Retrieved from https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/
  2. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority [ACARA]. (2017). Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/f-10-curriculum/cross-curriculum-priorities/sustainability/
  3. Bottoms, T. (1999). Djabugay Country: An Aboriginal History of Tropical North Queensland/ Sydney, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  4. Cairns Regional Council. (2015). Holloways beach environmental centre student Enrichment program – January to June 2015 update. Retrieved from http://www.cairns.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/151347/Clause-No-7_Planning-And-Economic_14-October-2015v2.pdf
  5. Charles, C., Louv, R., Bodner, L., Guns, B., & Stahl, D. (2009). Children and nature 2009: A report on the movement to reconnect children to the natural world. Santa Fe, AZ: Children and Nature Network (CNN) and eco-America.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, R. E., Kirschner, P. A., & Sweller, J. (2012). Putting students on the path to learning: The case for fully guided instruction. American Educator, 36, 6–11.Google Scholar
  7. Collier, M. J., & Devitt, C. (2016). Novel ecosystems: Challenges and opportunities for the Anthropocene. The Anthropocene Review.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cuervo, H. (2016). Rural teaching and learning in neoliberal times. In Understanding social justice in rural education (pp. 47–78). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Davies, J. (2016). The birth of the Anthropocene. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage, and the Arts. (2009). Living sustainably: The Australian government’s national action plan for education for sustainability. Canberra, ACT: DEWHA.Google Scholar
  11. Djabukai Aboriginal Corporations [DAC]. (2017). Bama. Retrieved from http://www.djabugay.org.au/bama.html
  12. Flinders, D. J. (2001). Nel Noddings. In J. A. Palmer (Ed.), Fifty modern thinkers on education. From Piaget to the present. London, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Gammage, B. (2011). The biggest estate on earth. How aborigines made Australia. Sydney, NSW: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  14. Hamilton, C. (2016). The Anthropocene as rupture. The Anthropocene Review, 3(2), 93–106.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2053019616634741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hjorth, P., & Bagheri, A. (2006). Navigating towards sustainable development: A system dynamics approach. Futures, 38, 74–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.04.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hollingsworth, J., & Ybarra, S. (2009). Explicit direct instruction: The power of the well-crafted well-taught lesson. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
  17. Laird, S. (2017). Learning to live in the Anthropocene: Our children and ourselves. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 36, 265–282.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-017-9571-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Malone, K. (2011). My island home: Theorising childhood in the Cook Islands. The Asia Pacific Journal of Anthropology, 12(5), 462–477.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14442213.2011.611817CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  20. Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  21. Noddings, N. (2005). Caring in education. The encyclopedia of informal education. Retrieved from http://infed.org/mobi/caring-in-education/
  22. Perring, M. J., Audet, P., & Lamb, D. (2014). Novel ecosystems in ecological restoration and rehabilitation: Innovative planning or lowering the bar? Ecological Processes, 3(8). Retrieved from http://www.ecologicalprocesses.com/content/3/1/8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Reside, A. E., Beher, J., Cosgrove, A. J., Evans, M. C., Seabrook, L., Silcock, J. L., … Maron, M. (2017). Ecological consequences of land clearing and policy reform in Queensland. Pacific Conservation Biology, 23(3), 219–230.  https://doi.org/10.1071/PC17001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rosenshine, B. (2012). Principles of instruction: Research-based strategies that all teachers should know. American Educator, 36, 12–39.Google Scholar
  25. Salter, P., & Maxwell, J. (2016). The inherent vulnerability of the Australian curriculum cross-curriculum priorities. Critical Studies in Education, 57(3), 296–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Skeene, G. (2009). Two cultures: Children from the aboriginal camps and reserves in Cairns city (2nd ed.). Brassall, QLD: The Rams Skull Press.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, G. A., & Stevenson, R. B. (2017). Sustaining education for sustainability in turbulent times. Journal of Environmental Education, 48(2), 79–95.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2016.1264920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Stevenson, R. B., Nicholls, J., & Whitehouse, H. (2017). What is climate change education? Curriculum Perspectives, 37(1), 67–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-017-0015-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Thorne, M. (2017). Learning for environmental stewardship in the Anthropocene: A study with young adolescents in the Wet Tropics. Ph.D. Thesis. Cairns, QLD: James Cook University.Google Scholar
  30. UNSW Global Pty Ltd. (2017). Education Assessment Australia: ICAS Science. Retrieved from https://www.eaa.unsw.edu.au/icas/subjects/science
  31. Weir, J. K., Stacey, C., & Youngetob, K. (2011). The benefits associated with caring for country: A literature review. Canberra, ACT: Australian Institute of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Studies. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.au/indigenous/workingoncountry/publications/pubs/benefits-cfc.pdf
  32. Wet Tropics Management Authority [WTMA]. (2017). Wet tropics world heritage area. Retrieved from http://www.wettropics.gov.au/home
  33. Whitehouse, H. (2011). Talking up country: Language, natureculture and interculture in Australian environmental education research. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 27(1), 56–67.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S081406200000070CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Williams, S. E., Bolitho, E. E., & Fox, S. (2003). Climate change in Australian tropical rainforests: An impending environmental catastrophe. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 270(1527), 1887–1892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hilary Whitehouse
    • 1
    Email author
  • Neus (Snowy) Evans
    • 1
  • Clifford Jackson
    • 1
  • Marcia Thorne
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Arts, Society and EducationJames Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Amy Cutter-Mackenzie
    • 1
  • Karen Malone
    • 2
  • Marianne Krasny
    • 3
  • Hilary Whitehouse
    • 4
  1. 1.School of Education, Gold Coast CampusSouthern Cross UniversityGold CoastAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Educational ResearchWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Cornell UniversityIthacaUSA
  4. 4.James Cook UniversityCairnsAustralia

Personalised recommendations