Encyclopedia of Wildfires and Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Fires

Living Edition
| Editors: Samuel L. Manzello

Defensive Actions and People Preparedness

  • Tara McGeeEmail author
  • Christine Eriksen
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51727-8_93-1

Synonyms

Definition

Defensive actions can be undertaken by homeowners to help protect themselves and their home from a WUI fire (wildfire impacting the wildland-urban interface).

Introduction

Defensive actions include preparedness and mitigation measures. Preparedness decision-making and actions enable individuals and groups to respond effectively when a WUI fire occurs in order to protect their life. Mitigation measures can be completed in advance to help reduce negative impacts from a WUI fire to a person’s life and property. Implementing defensive actions well in advance of the fire season can both reduce community vulnerability and increase resilience to WUI fires. It is an important element of adaptive capacity that allows people to coexist with the hazardous environment in which they live.

Being well-prepared for WUI fire involves both physical and mental preparedness measures. Making a plan for how to respond if a fire occurs nearby may involve residents...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anton CE, Lawrence C (2016) Does place attachment predict wildfire mitigation and preparedness? A comparison of wildland-urban Interface and rural communities. Environ Manag 57(1):148–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brenkert-Smith H, Champ PA, Flores N (2012) Trying not to get burned: understanding homeowners’ wildfire risk-mitigation behaviors. Environ Manag 50(6):1139–1151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Collins TW (2008) What influences hazard mitigation? Household decision making about wildfire risks in Arizona’s White Mountains. Prof Geogr 60(4):508–526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dickinson K, Brenkert-Smith H, Champ P, Flores N (2015) Catching fire? Social interactions, beliefs, and wildfire risk mitigation behaviors. Soc Nat Resour 28(8):807–824CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eriksen C (2014) Gender and wildfire: landscapes of uncertainty. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Eriksen C, Gill N (2010) Bushfire and everyday life: examining the awareness-action ‘Gap’ in changing rural landscapes. Geoforum 41(5):814–825CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eriksen C, Prior T (2011) The art of learning: wildfire, amenity migration and local environmental knowledge. Int J Wildland Fire 20(4):612–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eriksen C, Prior T (2013) Defining the importance of mental preparedness for risk communication and residents well-prepared for wildfire. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Eriksen C, Wilkinson C (2017) Examining perceptions of luck in post-bushfire sense-making in Australia. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 24:242–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eriksen C, Penman TD, Horsey B, Bradstock R (2016) Wildfire survival plans in theory and practice. Int J Wildland Fire 25(4):363–377Google Scholar
  11. Gill N, Dun O, Brennan-Horley C, Eriksen C (2015) Landscape preferences, amenity, and bushfire risk in New South Wales, Australia. Environ Manag 56(3):738–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Harris LM, McGee TK, McFarlane BL (2011) Implementation of wildfire risk management by local governments in Alberta, Canada. J Environ Plan Manag 54(4):457–475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Labossière LMM, McGee TK (2017) Innovative wildfire mitigation by municipal governments: two case studies in western Canada. Int J Disaster Risk Reduc 22:204–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Martin WE, Martin IM, Kent B (2009) The role of risk perceptions in the risk mitigation process: the case of wildfire in high risk communities. J Environ Manag 91(2):489–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McCaffrey SM (2015) Community wildfire preparedness: a global state-of-the-knowledge summary of social science research. Curr For Rep 1(2):81–90Google Scholar
  16. McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B (2013) Social science research related to wildfire management: an overview of recent findings and future research needs. Int J Wildland Fire 22:15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McCaffrey S, Toman E, Stidham M, Shindler B (2015) Social science findings in the United States. In: Paton D, Shroder JF (eds) Wildfire hazards, risks, and disasters. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 15–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McFarlane BL, McGee TK, Faulkner H (2011) Complexity of homeowner wildfire risk mitigation: an integration of hazard theories. Int J Wildland Fire 20(8):921–931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McGee TK (2005) Completion of recommended WUI fire mitigation measures within urban households in Edmonton, Canada. Environ Hazard 6:147–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McGee TK, Russell S (2003) “It’s just a natural way of life…” an investigation of wildfire preparedness in rural Australia. Environ Hazard 5:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McGee TK, McFarlane BL, Varghese J (2009) An examination of the influence of hazard experience on wildfire risk perceptions and adoption of mitigation measures. Soc Nat Resour 22(4):308–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McLennan J, Paton D, Beatson R (2015) Psychological differences between south-eastern Australian householders who intend to leave if threatened by a wildfire and those who intend to stay and defend. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 11:35–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McNeill IM, Dunlop PD, Heath JB, Skinner TC, Morrison DL (2013) Expecting the unexpected: predicting physiological and psychological wildfire preparedness from perceived risk, responsibility, and obstacles. Risk Anal 33(10):1829–1843Google Scholar
  24. Olsen CS, Kline JD, Ager AA, Olsen KA, Short KC (2017) Examining the influence of biophysical conditions on wildland-urban interface homeowners’ risk mitigation activities in fire-prone landscapes. Ecol Soc 22:21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Penman TD, Eriksen C, Blanchi R, Chladil M, Gill AM, Haynes K, Leonard J, McLennan J, Bradstock RA (2013) Defining adequate means of residents to prepare property for protection from wildfire. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 6:67–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Penman TD, Eriksen C, Horsey B, Bradstock R (2016) How much does it cost residents to prepare their property for wildfire? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 16:88–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Penman TD, Eriksen C, Horsey B, Green A, Lemcke D, Cooper P, Bradstock RA (2017) Retrofitting for wildfire resilience: what is the cost? Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 21:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Prior T, Eriksen C (2013) Wildfire preparedness, community cohesion and social-ecological systems. Glob Environ Chang 23(6):1575–1586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Whittaker J, Haynes K, Handmer J, McLennan J (2013) Community safety during the 2009 Australian ‘Black Saturday’ bushfires: an analysis of household preparedness and response. Int J Wildland Fire 22(6):841–849CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Whittaker J, Eriksen C, Haynes K (2016) Gendered responses to the 2009 Black Saturday bushfires in Victoria, Australia. Geogr Res 54(2):203–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Earth and Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Social Sciences, School of Geography and Sustainable CommunitiesUniversity of WollongongWollongongAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Raphaele Blanchi
    • 1
  1. 1.Land & WaterCSIROMelbourneAustralia