British Pioneers and Fieldwork Traditions

  • Timothy Darvill
Living reference work entry

From its antiquarian origins, the development of field method in Britain reflects attempts by archaeologists to balance the merits of survey against excavation, research against rescue, and empiricism against theorized interpretation. While early methods lacked consistency, most were based on a modified form of empiricism known as inductivism: observations in the field gathered together to create interpretative statements (Marsden 1983). Richard Colt Hoare (1758–1838), excavator of more than 500 sites in the early 1800s, memorably summed up the position by declaring that “We speak from facts not theory” as the epigraph to Ancient Wiltshire published between 1812 and 1820. Importantly, a community of practice emerged to foster a network of amenity societies.

The late nineteenth century was a watershed in the development of archaeological fieldwork. Positivism strengthened as the preferred philosophy, suiting archaeology well by perpetuating distinctions between “facts” as things that...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Aitchison, K. 2010. United Kingdom archaeology in economic crisis. In Archaeology and the global economic crisis. Multiple impacts and possible solutions, ed. N. Schlanger and K. Aitchinson, 25–30. Tervuren: Culture Lab Editions. Accessed 10 Jan 2012.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, R.J.C. 1946. Field archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  3. Barker, P. 1977. Techniques of archaeological excavation. London: Batsford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Carver, M. 2009. Archaeological investigation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Coles, J. 1972. Field archaeology. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  6. Crawford, O.G.S. 1960. Archaeology in the field. London: Phoenix.Google Scholar
  7. Darvill, T. 2001. Traditions of landscape archaeology in Britain: Issues of time and scale. In One land, many landscapes. Papers from a session held at the European Association of Archaeologists Fifth Annual Meeting in Bournemouth 1999, BAR International Series 987, ed. T. Darvill and M. Gojda, 33–46. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
  8. Darvill, T., K. Barrass, B. Russell, and E. Milner. 2018. Archaeology in the PPG16 Era: Investigations in England 1990–2010. Oxford: Oxbow Books & Historic England.Google Scholar
  9. Hodder, I. 1999. The archaeological process. An introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Marsden, B. 1983. Pioneers of prehistory. Leaders and landmarks in English archaeology (1500–1900). Ormskirk: Hesketh.Google Scholar
  11. Roskams, S. 2001. Excavation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Manuals in Archaeology.Google Scholar
  12. Wheeler, M. 1954. Archaeology from the Earth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Archaeology, Anthropology & Forensic ScienceBournemouth UniversityBournemouth, DorsetUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sandra Monton Subias
    • 1
  • Bisserka Gaydarska
    • 2
  1. 1.Departament d'HumanitatsICREA/Universitat Pompeu Fabra.BarcelonaSpain
  2. 2.Department of ArchaeologyDurham UniversityDurhamUK