Skip to main content

Philosophical Anthropology and Business Ethics

Reviving the Virtue of Wisdom

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

Abstract

Underpinning all our judgments about how to live and how to act is our conception of what we are as human beings. As discussed in “Creating an Effective Business Ethics,” entrenched assumptions about human nature deriving from the philosophies of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are embodied in business practices where neoliberal ideology is dominant. It has been reinforced and virtually placed beyond questioning, not only by the triumph of neoliberal managerialism, which identifies “good” with profitability in an unconstrained market, but by the fragmentation of philosophy itself, which, by accepting the separation of science and the humanities, excludes possibilities for challenging the assumptions on which neoliberal managerialism is based. This chapter continues the virtue ethics project by focusing on philosophical anthropology as the discipline that investigates questions such as “What are humans?” “What are their potentialities?” “Which potentialities should be realized?” and “How should we make these potentialities prevail?” It is argued here that philosophical anthropology, inspired by the quest for self-knowledge as central to developing the virtue of wisdom, challenges the Hobbesian/Lockean tradition and can replace it, with better results for a more ethical society and more ethical business. Reacting against this tradition, leading philosophical anthropologists have argued that humans are essentially cultural beings, creating themselves and their institutions, their relations to others, to society, and to nature, through the concepts they develop, embrace, and assume in their actions. These concepts can be questioned and modified or replaced, in search for wisdom and for living wisely. Superior concepts are those that do more justice to the potentialities of humans and other life forms, and that can more successfully orient people to create the future. It is through philosophical anthropology that traditional virtues can be revived and effectively defended: Our challenge is not only to develop better concepts to orient ourselves but to show how these concepts can be acted upon and thus incorporated into social reality (and ultimately, physical reality). The implications of philosophical anthropology for business ethics are discussed in this context.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Berger PL, Luckmann T (1966) The social construction of reality. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1998) Acts of resistance: against the tyranny of the market (trans: Nice R). New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2003) Firing back: against the tyranny of the market 2 (trans: Wacquant L). Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (2005) The social structures of the economy (trans: Turner C). Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-J (2004) Reclaiming development: an alternative economic policy manual. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-J (2007) Institutional change and economic development: an introduction, Chapter 1. In: Chang H-J (ed) Institutional change and economic development. Anthem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang H-J (2011) 23 things they don’t tell you about capitalism. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Chia RCH, Holt R (2009) Strategy without design: the silent efficacy of indirect action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dibben MR (2000) Exploring interpersonal trust in the entrepreneurial venture. Macmillan, Houndsmills

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gare A (2009) Philosophical anthropology, ethics and political philosophy in an age of impending catastrophe. Cosmos Hist 5(2):264–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare A (2011) From Kant to Schelling to process metaphysics: on the way to ecological civilization. Cosmos Hist 7(2):26–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare A (2016a) The centrality of philosophical anthropology to (a future) environmental ethics (or La centralidad de la antropología filosófica para una (futura) ética ambiental’). Cuademos de Bioética (special edition on ‘The Future of Environmental Ethics’), Número 91, Revista cuatrimestral de investigación, XXVII, septiembre-diciembre, 299–317

    Google Scholar 

  • Gare A (2016b) The philosophical foundation of ecological civilization: a manifesto for the future. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gehlen A (1968) An anthropological model. Hum Context 1(1):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobbes T (1651/1985) Leviathan. Penguin, Harmondsworth

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmeyer J (1996) Signs of meaning in the universe (trans: Haveland BJ). Indiana University Press, Bloomington

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth A, Joas H (1988) Social action and human nature. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker CA (1982) Scientific neutrality versus normative learning: the theoretician’s and politician’s dilemma. In: Oldroyd D (ed) Science and ethics. New South Wales University Press, Kensington, pp 8–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant I [ ] [1800] (2005) Introduction to logic (trans: Abbott TK). Barnes & Noble, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Korten DC (2015) Change the story, change the future: a living economy for a living Earth. Berrett-Koehler, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamprecht SP (1946) Metaphysics: its function, consequences, and criteria. J Philos XLIII(15): 393–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre A (2007) After virtue, 3rd edn. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead GH (1934) In: Morris CW (ed) Mind, self, & society. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • North DC (1990) Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pascale RT, Athos AG (1982) The art of Japanese management. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettifor A (2017) The production of money: how to break the power of bankers. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Plehwe D, Walpen B, Neunhöffer G (eds) (2006) Neoliberal hegemony: a global critique. Routledge, Milton Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert ES (2007a) How rich countries got rich … and why poor countries stay poor. Carrol & Graf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert ES (2007b) Institutionalism ancient, old, and new: a historical perspective on institutions and uneven development, Chapter 4. In: Chang H-J (ed) Institutional change and economic development. Anthem Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Salthe S (2005) The natural philosophy of ecology: developmental systems ecology. Ecol Complex 2:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner Q (2008) Hobbes and republican liberty. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon RC (1993) Ethics and excellence: cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon RC (1994) Above the bottom line: an introduction to business ethics. Harcourt Brace, Fort Worth

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulanowicz RE (1997) Ecology: the ascendent perspective. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn A (2005) Institutions and the environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • von Humboldt W (1963) Humanist without portfolio (trans and ed: Cowan M). Wayne State University, Detroit

    Google Scholar 

  • Zammito JH (2002) Kant, herder, & the birth of anthropology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arran Gare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Gare, A. (2019). Philosophical Anthropology and Business Ethics. In: Neesham, C., Segal, S. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_6-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_6-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics