Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Territoriality

  • Christine R. Maher
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_725-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Territoriality refers to maintenance of a territory and thus includes territorial behavior, at the individual level, and spatial patterns that result from those individual interactions, at the population level (Hinsch and Komdeur 2017). However, territory may be defined conceptually in many ways (Maher and Lott 1995). The most common conceptual definitions can be grouped into one of three categories, and they illustrate the difference in emphasis between ecological and behavioral aspects of territoriality: defended area, exclusive area, and site-specific dominance. The oldest definition, defense (Howard 1920), reflects a focus on interactions that produce the outcome, whereas use of an exclusive area (Pitelka 1959) highlights the outcome rather than the process. A researcher’s choice of definitions often reflects the taxonomic group and habits of species being studied (Maher and Lott 1995). Thus, scientists studying more easily observed...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alcock, J. (2013). Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach (10th ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, J. L. (1964). The evolution of diversity in avian territorial systems. Wilson Bulletin, 76, 160–169.Google Scholar
  3. Burnham, K. P., & Anderson, D. R. (2002). Model selection and multimodel inference: A practical information-theoretic approach (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Carpenter, F. L., Paton, D. C., & Hixon, M. A. (1983). Weight gain and adjustment of territory size in migrant hummingbirds. Proceedings of the National Academies of Science, 80, 7259–7263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davies, N. B., & Houston, A. I. (1981). Owners and satellites: The economics of territory defence in the pied wagtail, Motacilla alba. Journal of Animal Ecology, 50, 157–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davies, N. B., & Houston, A. I. (1984). Territory economics. In C. J. Krebs & N. B. Davies (Eds.), Behavioural ecology: An evolutionary approach (pp. 148–169). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  7. Drury, J. P., Okamoto, K. W., Anderson, C. N., & Grether, G. F. (2015). Reproductive interference explains persistence of aggression between species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 282(1804), 20142256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Eason, P. K., & Stamps, J. A. (1992). The effect of visibility on territory size and shape. Behavioral Ecology, 3, 166–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gill, F. B., & Wolf, L. L. (1975). Economics of feeding territoriality in the golden-winged sunbird. Ecology, 56, 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Heap, S., Byrne, P., & Stuart-Fox, D. (2012). The adoption of landmarks for territorial boundaries. Animal Behaviour, 83, 871–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hinsch, M., & Komdeur, J. (2017). What do territory owners defend against? Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 284, 20162356.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2016.2356CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Howard, H. E. (1920). Territory in bird life. London: John Murray.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Huntingford, F. A., & Turner, A. K. (1987). Animal conflict. London: Chapman and Hall Ltd..CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krebs, J. R. (1977). Song and territory in the great tit Parus major. In B. Stonehouse & C. Perrins (Eds.), Evolutionary ecology (pp. 47–62). London: Macmillan Education UK.Google Scholar
  15. Losin, N., Drury, J. P., Peiman, K. S., Storch, C., & Grether, G. F. (2016). The ecological and evolutionary stability of interspecific territoriality. Ecology Letters, 19(3), 260–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lott, D. F. (1991). Intraspecific variation in the social systems of wild vertebrates. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Maher, C. R., & Lott, D. F. (1995). Definitions of territoriality used in the study of variation in vertebrate spacing systems. Animal Behaviour, 49, 1581–1597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Maher, C. R., & Lott, D. F. (2000). A review of ecological determinants of territoriality within vertebrate species. American Midland Naturalist, 143, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Marler, C. A., Walsberg, G., White, M. L., & Moore, M. (1995). Increased energy expenditure due to increased territorial defense in male lizards after phenotypic manipulation. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 37, 225–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maynard Smith, J., & Parker, G. A. (1976). The logic of asymmetric contests. Animal Behaviour, 24(1), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moser-Purdy, C., MacDougall-Shackleton, S. A., Bonier, F., Graham, B. A., Boyer, A. C., & Mennill, D. J. (2017a). Male song sparrows have elevated testosterone in response to neighbors versus strangers. Hormones and Behavior, 93, 47–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moser-Purdy, C., MacDougall-Shackleton, E. A., & Mennill, D. J. (2017b). Enemies are not always dear: Male song sparrows adjust dear enemy effect expression in response to female fertility. Animal Behaviour, 126, 17–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller, C. A., & Manser, M. B. (2007). ‘Nasty neighbours’ rather than ‘dear enemies’ in a social carnivore. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1612), 959–965.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.0222CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Newey, P. S., Robson, S. K. A., & Crozier, R. H. (2010). Weaver ants Oecophylla smaragdina encounter nasty neighbors rather than dear enemies. Ecology, 91, 2366–2372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pitelka, F. A. (1959). Numbers, breeding schedule, and territoriality in pectoral sandpipers of northern Alaska. Condor, 61, 233–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reed, J. M., Boulinier, T., Danchin, E., & Oring, L. W. (1999). Informed dispersal: Prospecting by birds for breeding sites. In V. Nolan Jr., E. D. Ketterson, & C. F. Thompson (Eds.), Current ornithology (Vol. 15, pp. 189–259). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shier, D. M., & Swaisgood, R. R. (2011). Fitness costs of neighborhood disruption in translocations of a solitary mammal. Conservation Biology, 26, 116–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sih, A., & Mateo, J. M. (2001). Punishment and persistence pay: A new model of territory establishment and space use. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 16, 477–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Stamps, J. A. (1988). Conspecific attraction and aggregation in territorial species. American Naturalist, 131, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stamps, J. A., & Krishnan, V. V. (1999). A learning-based model of territory establishment. Quarterly Review of Biology, 74, 291–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stamps, J. A., & Krishnan, V. V. (2001). How territorial animals compete for divisible space: A learning-based model with unequal competitors. American Naturalist, 157(2), 154–169.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Temeles, E. J. (1994). The role of neighbours in territorial systems: When are they “dear enemies”? Animal Behaviour, 47, 339–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wingfield, J. C., Lynn, S. E., & Soma, K. K. (2001). Avoiding the ‘costs’ of testosterone: Ecological bases of hormone-behavior interactions. Brain, Behavior and Evolution, 57(5), 239–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wolff, J. O., & Peterson, J. A. (1998). An offspring-defense hypothesis for territoriality in female mammals. Ethology Ecology and Evolution, 10, 227–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ydenberg, R. C., Giraldeau, L.-A., & Falls, J. B. (1988). Neighbours, strangers, and the asymmetric war of attrition. Animal Behaviour, 36(2), 343–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of Southern MainePortlandUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Caroline Leuchtenberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Federal Institute FarroupilhaPanambiBrasil