Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior

Living Edition
| Editors: Jennifer Vonk, Todd Shackelford

Modern Synthesis

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_203-1

Synonyms

Definition

The modern synthetic theory of evolution describes the evolution in terms of genetic variations in a population that leads to the formation of a new species.

Introduction

Darwin’s book, The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, founded a strong ground for evolutionary theories that favored the idea that all the organisms have descended from a common ancestor. Darwin proposed natural selection as a mechanism of evolution. Then came the neo-Darwinian theory of evolution that explained the significance of mutations and variations within a population, as a driver factor of evolution. This perspective was followed for many decades.

Ronald Fisher and his colleagues set Darwin’s concept of natural selection on a new foundation of genetics. They left an equally major project open for later biologists: to explain in the language of genes what species are and how they originate. While the Darwin’s theory largely demonstrated the “facts” of...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, M. B. (1991). Through the looking glass: The evolution of Soviet Darwinism. New Perspectives on Evolution, 37–63.Google Scholar
  2. Angers, B., Castonguay, E., & Massicotte, R. (2010). Environmentally induced phenotypes and DNA methylation: How to deal with unpredictable conditions until the next generation and after. Molecular Ecology, 19(7), 1283–1295.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Arthur, W. (2000). The origin of animal body plans: A study in evolutionary developmental biology. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brakefield, P. M. (1998). The evolution–development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns of Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity, 80(3), 265–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dietrich, M. R. (1995). Richard Goldschmidt's “heresies” and the evolutionary synthesis. Journal of the History of Biology, 28(3), 431–461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dobzhansky, T., & Dobzhansky, T. G. (1937). Genetics and the origin of species (Vol. 11). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Futuyma, D. J. (1986). Reflections on reflections: ecology and evolutionary biology. Journal of the History of Biology, 19(2), 303–312.Google Scholar
  8. Gilbert, S. F. (1998). Conceptual breakthroughs in developmental biology. Journal of Biosciences, 23(3), 169–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gilbert, S. F. (2000). Diachronic biology meets evo-devo: CH Waddington’s approach to evolutionary developmental biology. American Zoologist, 40(5), 729–737.Google Scholar
  10. Gilbert, S. F., Opitz, J. M., & Raff, R. A. (1996). Resynthesizing evolutionary and developmental biology. Developmental Biology, 173(2), 357–372.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Gottlieb, G. (1992). Individual development and evolution: The genesis of novel behavior. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hamburger, V. (1980). Embryology and the modern synthesis in evolutionary theory. In E. Mayr & W. Provine (Eds.), The evolutionary synthesis: Perspectives on the unification of biology (pp. 97–112). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Koch, P. B., Keys, D. N., Rocheleau, T., Aronstein, K., Blackburn, M., & Carroll, S. B. (1998). Regulation of dopa decarboxylase expression during colour pattern formation in wild-type and melanic tiger swallowtail butterflies. Development, 125(12), 2303–2313.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Macdonald, S. J., & Goldstein, D. B. (1999). A quantitative genetic analysis of male sexual traits distinguishing the sibling species Drosophila simulans and D. sechellia. Genetics, 153(4), 1683–1699.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Pigliucci, M. (2007). Do we need an extended evolutionary synthesis? Evolution, 61(12), 2743–2749.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pigliucci, M. M. (2010). Evolution – The extended synthesis (no. 576.82 E9).Google Scholar
  17. Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., & Pigliucci, M. (2010). What role does heritable epigenetic variation play in phenotypic evolution? BioScience, 60(3), 232–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schrey, A. W., Richards, C. L., Meller, V., Sollars, V., Ruden, D. M. (2012). The role of epigenetics in evolution: the extended synthesis. Genetics Research International, 2012. doi:10.1155/2012/286164.Google Scholar
  19. Waddington, C. H. (1953). Genetic assimilation of an acquired character. Evolution, 7(2), 118–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Waddington, C. H. (2011). The epigenotype. International Journal of Epidemiology, 41(1), 10–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeng, Z. B., Kao, C. H., & Basten, C. J. (1999). Estimating the genetic architecture of quantitative traits. Genetics Research, 74(3), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Molecular & Human GeneticsBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Akash Gautam
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Neural and Cognitive Sciences, School of Medical SciencesUniversity of HyderabadHyderabadIndia