Abstract
This chapter reports a case study project which examined tertiary heritage language learners’ perceptions of a pedagogical intervention, which embedded autonomous and intercultural learning in their Chinese language program. The goal of the study was to enhance heritage learners’ engagement motivation and performance in their Chinese language studies, through offering them autonomous learning tasks and reflection opportunities. Twenty student participants engaged in a variety of linguistic, intercultural and reflection tasks, across one semester. Analysis of both quantitative and qualitative data shows that students responded positively to the intervention and evidenced a number of important outcomes. The study demonstrates the role of reflection in developing metacognition. For heritage learners, the reflection was an opportunity for identity development and motivation. The intervention developed students’ capacity for independent learning and supported motivation and continuation to further study. The intervention was a catalyst for students to actively seek opportunities for interaction with the Chinese language community, using their family and community knowledge. The study shows the particular relevance and affordance of autonomous learning strategies for Chinese heritage language learners and has implications for all HL teaching and learning. The study provides new understandings of the potential and ability of Chinese heritage learners to manipulate, exploit, and extend their knowledge of two or more languages.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, N. J. (2008). Metacognition and good language learners. In Lessons from Good Language Learners (pp. 99–109). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Benson, P. (2007). Autonomy in language teaching and learning. Language Teaching, 40(01), 21–40.
Benson, P. (2013). Teaching and researching: Autonomy in language learning. New York: Routledge.
Besser, S., & Chik, A. (2014). Narratives of second language identity amongst young English learners in Hong Kong. ELT Journal, 68(3), 299–309.
Carreira, M. (2004). Seeking explanatory adequacy: A dual approach to understanding the term “Heritage Language Learner”. Heritage Language Journal, 2(1), 1–25.
Cho, G., Cho, K.-S., & Tse, L. (1997). Why ethnic minorities need to develop their heritage language: The case of Korean Americans. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 10, 106–112.
Comanaru, R., & Noels, K. A. (2009). Self-determination motivation and the learning of Chinese as a heritage language. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(1), 131–158.
Commonwealth of Australia. (2012). Australia in the Asia Century. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Csizér, K., & Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The internal structure of language learning motivation and its relationship with language choice and learning effort. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 19–36.
Dewey, J. (1933/1986). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. In J. A. Boydston (Ed.), The later works of John Dewey. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 motivational self system. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Dörnyei, Z., & Ushioda, E. (Eds.). (2009). Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Second Language acquisition. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Doyé, P. (1996). Foreign language teaching and education for intercultural and international understanding. Evaluation & Research in Education, 10(2), 104–112.
Ely, C. M. (1986). Language learning motivation: a descriptive and causal analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 70(1), 28–35.
Gee, J. P. (1988). Discourse systems and Aspirin Bottles: On literacy. Journal of Education, 170(1), 27–40.
González, N., Moll, L. C., & Amanti, C. (Eds.). (2013). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York: Routledge.
He, A. W. (2010). The heart of heritage: Sociocultural dimensions of heritage language learning. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 66–82.
He, A. W., & Xiao, Y. (Eds.). (2008). Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
Holliday, A. (2010). Intercultural communication & ideology. New York: Sage.
Kondo-Brown, K. (2005). Differences in language skills: Heritage language learner subgroups and foreign language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 89(4), 563–581.
Kondo-Brown, K., & Brown, J. D. (2008). Teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, Materials and assessment. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Kramsch, C. (2006). From communicative competence to symbolic competence. Perspectives. The Modern Language Journal, 90(ii), 249–252.
Li, D., & Duff, P. A. (2008). Issues in Chinese heritage language education and research at the postsecondary level. In A. W. He & Y. Xiao (Eds.), Chinese as a heritage language: Fostering rooted world citizenry. Honolulu: University of Hawaii, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Little, D. (1991). Learner autonomy 1: Definitions, issues and problems. Dublin: Authentik.
Little, D. (2009). Language learner autonomy and the European language portfolio: Two L2 English examples. Language Teaching, 42(02), 222–233.
Lo-Philip, S. W. Y. (2010). Towards a theoretical framework of heritage language, literacy and identity processes. Linguistics and Education, 21, 282–297.
Macaro, E. (2006). Strategies for language learning and for language use: Revising the theoretical framework. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 320–337.
Moloney, R., & Oguro, S. (2015). To know what it’s like to be Japanese: A case study of the experiences of Heritage Learners of Japanese in Australia. In I. Nakane, E. Otsuji, & W. S. Armour (Eds.), Languages and identities in a transitional Japan (pp. 121–140). New York: Routledge.
Moloney, R., & Xu, H. L. (2015). Intercultural competence in tertiary learners of Chinese as a foreign language: Analysis of an innovative learning task. In R. Moloney & H. L. Xu (Eds.), Exploring innovative pedagogy in the teaching and learning of Chinese as a Foreign Language (pp. 97–114). Singapore: Springer.
Montrul, S. A. (2012). Is the heritage language like a second language? EUROSLA Yearbook, 12, 1–29.
Neuman, W. L. (2000). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Nunan, D., & Richards, J. C. (Eds.). (2015). Language learning beyond the classroom. New York: Routledge.
Orton, J. (2011). Educating Chinese Language teachers – Some fundamentals. In L. Tsung & K. Cruikshank (Eds.), Teaching and learning Chinese in global contexts (pp. 151–164). London: Continuum.
Reinders, H. (2011). Materials development for learning beyond the classroom. In Beyond the language classroom (pp. 175–189). Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.
Sercu, L. (2002). Autonomous learning and the acquisition of intercultural communicative competence: Some implications for course development. Language Culture and Curriculum, 15(1), 61–74.
Valdes, G. (2001). Heritage language students: profiles and possibilities. In J. K. Peyton, D. A. Ranard, & S. McGinnis (Eds.), Heritage Languages in America. Preserving a national resource (pp. 37–80). McHenry: Delta Systems/CAL.
Wang, S. C. (2004). Bi-literacy resource eco-System of intergenerational transmission of heritage language and culture: An ethnographic study of a Chinese community in the United States. Unpublished Ph. D dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
Wang, J., Spencer, K., & Xing, M. (2009). Metacognitive beliefs and strategies in learning Chinese as a foreign language. System, 37(1), 46–56.
Weger-Guntharp, H. D. (2008). The affective needs of limited proficiency heritage language learners: Perspectives from a Chinese foreign language classroom. In K. Kondo-Brown & J. D. Brown (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials and assessment (pp. 211–234). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wen, X. (2011). Chinese language learning motivation: A comparative study of heritage and non-heritage learners. Heritage Language Journal, 8(3), 41–66.
Wong Ka, F., & Yang, X. (2010). Diversity and difference: Identity issues of Chinese heritage language learners from dialect backgrounds. Heritage Language Journal., 7(2), 152–187.
Wu, S. M. (2008). Robust learning for Chinese heritage learners: Motivation, linguistics and technology. In K. Kondo-Brown & J. D. Brown (Eds.), Teaching Chinese, Japanese, and Korean heritage language students: Curriculum needs, materials and assessment (pp. 271–297). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Xu, H. L., & Moloney, R. (2014). Identifying Chinese heritage learners’ motivations, learning needs and learning goals: A case study of a cohort of heritage learners in an Australian University. Language Learning in Higher Education., 4(2), 365–393.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix 1
Appendix 2
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Xu, H.L., Moloney, R. (2018). Developing Metacognition and Interculturality in Heritage Language Learners. In: Trifonas, P., Aravossitas, T. (eds) Handbook of Research and Practice in Heritage Language Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44694-3_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44694-3_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44692-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44694-3
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education