Abstract
When exploring how students learn to design and problem solve, it is relevant to recognize the importance of the materials used and how they impact the design and problem-solving processes. The chapter illustrates this in the area of resistant materials in technology education and explores the multifaceted complexity of and interaction between design and problem solving and materials. Consequently, an exploration of the role of experiences with materials enables an analysis of how this learning can occur when situated within the context of resistant materials and the domain of mechanical engineering.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anderson, S., & Felici, M. (2012). Emerging technological risk: Underpinning the risk of technology innovation. London: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2143-5.
Brown, J., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42. doi:10.3102/0013189X018001032.
Cordon, D., Williams, B., Beyerlein, S., & Elger, D. (2007). Distinguishing among processes of problem solving, design, and research to improve project performance (Report No. AC 2007–2287). Moscow, ID: American Society for Engineering Education. Retrieved 30 July 2014 from Pacific Crest Resources & Development website: http://www.pcrest2.com/institute_resources/RI/AC_2007-2287_Final.pdf
Daly, S., Adams, R., & Bodner, G. (2012). What does it mean to design? A qualitative investigation of design professionals’ experiences. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(2), 187–219. doi:10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb00048.x.
de Vries, M. (2006). Technological knowledge and artifacts: An analytical view. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 17–29). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
de Vries, M. (2012). Philosophy of technology. In P. J. Williams (Ed.), Technology education for teachers (pp. 15–34). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers. doi:10.1007/978-94-6209-161-0_2.
Faulkner, W. (1994). Conceptualising knowledge used in innovation: A second look at the science-technology distinction and industrial innovation. Science, Technology & Human Values, 19(4), 425–458. doi:10.1177/016224399401900402.
Gott, S. (1989). Apprenticeship instruction for real-world tasks: The coordination of procedures, mental models and strategies. In E. Rothkopf (Ed.), Review of research in education, 15, 1988–1989 (pp. 97–169). Washington, DC: AERA.
Herschbach, D. (1995). Technology as knowledge: Implications for instruction. Journal of Technology Education, 7(1), 31–42.
Hill, A., & Smith, H. (2005). Research in purpose and value for the study of technology in secondary schools: A theory of authentic learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 19–32. doi:10.1007/s10798-004-6195-2.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO978051181535.
Lewis, T. (2005). Creativity: A framework for the design/problem solving discourse in technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 17(1), 35–52.
Martin, M., & Owen-Jackson, G. (2013). Is design and technology about making or knowing? In G. Owen-Jackson (Ed.), Debates in design and technology (pp. 64–73). London: Routledge.
McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14(1), 21–44. doi:10.1023/B:ITDE.0000007359.81781.7c.
McCormick, R., & Davidson, M. (1996). Problem solving and the tyranny of product outcome. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 1(3), 230–241.
McCormick, R., Murphy, P., & Hennessy, S. (1994). Problem solving processes in technology education: A pilot study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 4(1), 5–34. doi:10.1007/BF01197581.
McNair, V., & Clarke, R. (2007). Effective technology and design teaching: Getting it right in the classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 271–290. doi:10.1007/s10798-006-9003-3.
McRobbie, C., Stein, S., & Ginns, I. (2001). Exploring designerly thinking of students as novice designers. Research in Science Education, 31(1), 91–116.
Merrill, C., Custer, R., Daugherty, J., Westrick, M., & Zeng, Y. (2008). Delivering core engineering concepts to secondary level students. Journal of Technology Education, 20(1), 48–64.
Middleton, H. (2005). Creative thinking, values and design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(1), 61–71. doi:10.1007/s10798-004-6199-y.
Mokyr, J. (2002). The gifts of Athena: Historical origins of the knowledge economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Norman, E. (1998). The nature of technology for design. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1(1), 61–71.
Petrina, S. (2007). Advanced teaching methods for the technology classroom. Hershey, PA: Information Science Publishing.
Potter, P. (2013). Technologists talk: Making the links between design, problem solving and experiences with resistant materials. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(1), 69–85. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9159-3.
Potter, P. (2015, October 4–7). Exploring the interrelationship of problem solving and design in resistant materials technology. Paper presented at TENZ conference, 20/20 vision, Hamilton.
Potter, P., & France, B. (2016). Informing a pedagogy for design and problem-solving in resistant materials by theorising technologists’ learning experiences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 26(3). doi:10.1007/s10798-016-9376-x.
Ropohl, G. (1997). Knowledge types in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1), 65–72. doi:10.1023/A:1008865104461.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
Stein, S., Docherty, M., & Hannam, R. (2003). Making the processes of designing explicit within an information technology environment. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13(2), 145–170. doi:10.1023/A:1022312323398.
Taylor, P. (2000). How to develop problem-solving in design and technology. In J. Eggleston (Ed.), Teaching and learning design and technology (pp. 34–44). London: Continuum.
Vincenti, W. (1991). What engineers know and how they know it: Analytical studies from aeronautical history. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Wiener, N. (1993). Invention: The care and feeding of ideas. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Potter, P., France, B. (2018). Influences of Materials on Design and Problem Solving Learning About Materials. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_35
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_35
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44686-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44687-5
eBook Packages: EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education