Skip to main content

Teaching Electronics: From Building Circuits to Systems Thinking and Programming

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Technology Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

Abstract

This chapter addresses a number of reforms in teaching electronics in school to reflect the technological changes and objectives of education in the twenty-first century. One necessary reform in the electronics curriculum is the shift from the traditional teaching of basic components and circuits to teaching electronic systems such as sound, control, and communication systems, with a focus on understanding general technological concepts such as control, feedback, amplification, conversion, modulation, and filtering of electronic signals. A second reform required in teaching electronics relates to highlighting the STEM viewpoint, particularly physics and mathematics, which are an integral part of electronics. A third expected reform in teaching modern electronics is the transition from using conventional electronics hardware to programmable devices such as the field-programmable gate array (FPGA) or the Arduino microcontroller. The use of programmable controllers opens up tremendous possibilities for student projects, such as control systems and robotics, and for STEM-oriented studies, such as computerized physics and chemistry labs. A fourth change in the focus of teaching electronics is placing greater emphasis on project-based learning (PBL) in the electronics class. However, one must take into consideration that the new technologies may also lead to “doing without learning,” and students must acquire some basic knowledge and skills before being able to cope with advanced technologies and PB. In summary, electronics offers a rich, flexible, and friendly learning environment for teaching technology and engineering in K-12 education and for fostering students’ broad competences such as design, problem solving, creative thinking, and teamwork.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 359.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alha, K., & Gibson, I. S. (2003). Using ICT to improve the gender balance in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 28(2), 215–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awad, N., & Barak, M. (2014). Sound, waves and communication: Students’ achievements and motivation in learning a STEM-oriented program. Creative Education, 5(23), 1959–1968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2002). Learning good electronics, or coping with challenging tasks? Priorities of excellent students. Journal of Technology Education, 14(2), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2005). From order to disorder: The role of computer-based electronics projects on fostering of higher-order cognitive skills. Computers & Education, 45(2), 231–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2010). Motivating self-regulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(4), 381–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2012). From ‘doing’ to ‘doing with learning’: Reflection on an effort to promote self-regulated learning in technological projects in high school. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(1), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M. (2004). The use of computers in technological studies: Significant learning or superficial activity? Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 23(4), 329–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Assal, M. (2016). Robotics and STEM learning: Students’ achievements in assignments according to the P3 task taxonomy – Practice, problem solving, and projects. International Journal of Technology and Design Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., & Williams, P. (2007). Learning elemental structures and dynamic processes in technological systems: A cognitive framework. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(3), 323–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, M., Kastelan, I., & Azia, Z. (2016). Exploring aspects of self-regulated learning among engineering students learning digital system design in the FPGA environment – Methodology and findings. In R. Szewczyk, I. Kastelan, M. Temerinac, M. Barak, & V. Sruk (Eds.), Advances in embedded engineering education. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barlex, D., & Steeg, T. (2007). Developing engineers; The case of electronics education in English schools. Paper for the IEEE International Summit “Meeting the growing demand for engineers and their educators 2010–2020”, Munich, November 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Bransford, J. D. (1998). Doing With understanding: lessons from research on problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, D. F., & White, A. L. (2010). Preservice mathematics and science teachers in an integrated teacher preparation program for grades 7–12: A 3-year study of attitudes and perceptions related to integration. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing, C., Gang, L., & Yuehai, W. (2016). SPICE engine analysis and circuit simulation application development. Telkomnika, 14(1), 64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenfeld, P., Soloway, E., Marx, R., Krajcik, J., Guzdial, M., & Palincsar, A. (1991). Motivating project-based learning: Sustaining the doing, supporting the learning. Educational Psychologist, 26(3&4), 369–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booker, M. (2007). A roof without walls: Benjamin Bloom’s taxonomy and the misdirection of American education. Academic Questions, 20(4), 347–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. T. (2015). The role of systems thinking in systems engineering, design and management. Civil Engineering Dimension, 17(3), 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crismond, D. (2011). Scaffolding strategies for integrating engineering design and scientific inquiry in project-based learning environments. In M. Barak & M. Hacker (Eds.), Fostering human development through engineering and technology education (pp. 235–256). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • D’Ausilio, A. (2012). Arduino: A low-cost multipurpose lab equipment. Behaviour Research Methods, 44(2), 305–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1963). The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of Stem Education, 3(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M. (2002). Characteristics of engineering systems thinking-a 3-d approach for curriculum content. IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Part C Applications and Reviews, 32(3), 203–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, M., & Elata, D. (2005). Developing the capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST) of freshman engineering students. Systems Engineering, 8(2), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genlott, A., & Grönlund, Å. (2016). Closing the gaps – Improving literacy and mathematics by ICT-enhanced collaboration. Computers & Education, 99(2), 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark 2006. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hushman, C. J., & Marley, S. C. (2015). Guided instruction improves elementary student learning and self-efficacy in science. Journal of Educational Research, 108(5), 371–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kastelan, I., Lopez Benito, J. R., Artetxe, G. E., Piwinski, J., Barak, M., & Temerinac, M. (2014). E2LP: A unified embedded engineering learning platform. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 38(8), 933–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubínová, Š., & Šlégr, J. (2015a). ChemDuino: Adapting Arduino for low-cost chemical measurements in lecture and laboratory. Journal of Chemical Education, 92(10), 1751–1753.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubínová, S., & Šlégr, J. (2015b). Physics demonstrations with the Arduino board. Physics Education, 50(4), 472–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K., & Fish, E. (2013). New tools for do-it-yourself projects. PC World, 31(1), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logic.ly. – Software for teaching logic gates and digital systems. Available at http://logic.ly/

  • Mabbott, G. (2014). Teaching electronics and laboratory automation using microcontroller boards. Journal of Chemical Education, 91(9), 1458–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (U.S.). (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers and powerful ideas. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S. (1990). Constructionist learning. In I. Harel (Ed.), Constructionist learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resta, V., Huling, L., & Rainwater, N. (2001). Preparing second-career teachers. Educational Leadership, 58(8), 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossouw, A., Hacker, M., & de Vries, M. J. (2010). Concepts and contexts in engineering and technology education (CCETE): An international and interdisciplinary Delphi study. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(4), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saltmarsh, D., McMaugh, A., Santoro, N., & Reid, J. (2009). Editorial. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37(3), 229–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth un teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swenson, R., Clark, A., Ernst, J., & Sutton, K. (2016). Design, test, redesign: Simulation in technology, engineering, and design education classrooms. Technology & Engineering Teacher, 75(7), 8–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szewczyk, R., KaŠtelan, I., Temerinac, M., Barak, M., & Sruk, V. (Eds.). (2016). Embedded engineering education. Switzerland: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael: Autodesk, National.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tripto, J., Ben-Zvi Assaraf, O., Snapir, Z., & Amit, M. (2016). The ‘what is a system’ reflection interview as a knowledge integration activity for high school students’ understanding of complex systems in human biology. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 564–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1988). Cognition, construction of knowledge and teaching. Synthese, 80(1), 121–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. J. (2009). Teacher education. In A. T. Jones & M. J. De Vries (Eds.), International handbook of research and development in technology education (pp. 531–540). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusof, Y., Sanusi, H., & Mat, K. (2012). Computer simulation as preparation for electronics laboratory. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 60(2), 397–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The E2LP research mentioned in this chapter received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement no. 317882.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moshe Barak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Barak, M. (2018). Teaching Electronics: From Building Circuits to Systems Thinking and Programming. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics