Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Importance of the Conceptual in Progressing Technology Teaching and Learning

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Technology Education

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE))

  • 5011 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that technology education has a key role in enabling young people to actively participate in a world facing complex sociocultural and environmental challenges and an economy that is shifting from being knowledge driven to being innovation led. The aim of technology education internationally is to develop student technological literacy, and in New Zealand this literacy has been described as becoming increasingly “broad, deep, and critical” in nature as it progresses (Compton and France 2007; Compton and Harwood 2008). Further work in New Zealand to explore the transformatory nature of this literacy, as learning in technology progresses, resulted in three phases being identified as foundational, citizenship, and comprehensive technological literacy (Compton et al. 2011).

The chapter discusses what teachers need to know and do, to support student learning in technology and become more technologically literate, particularly related to foundational and citizenship technological literacy. It also discusses how the relationship between student decision-making and their undertaking of technological practice supports their progression toward a more comprehensive technological literacy. Findings from New Zealand classroom-based research are provided to support these discussions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 359.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 499.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, P. A. (2003). The development of expertise: The journey from acclimation to proficiency. Educational Researcher, 32(8), 10–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banchi, H., & Bell, R. (2008). The many levels of inquiry. Science and Children, 46(2), 26–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beyth-Marom, R., Fischhoff, B., Jacobs-Quadrel, M., & Furby, L. (1991). Teaching decision making to adolescents: A critical review. In J. Baron & R. V. Brown (Eds.), Teaching decision making to adolescents (pp. 19–60). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biotechnology Learning Hub. (2009). Ethical thinking tool. Retrieved 1 Mar 2011 from http://biotechlearn.org.nz/thinking_tools/ethics_thinking_tool/ethics_thinking_tool#/login

  • Bohanec, M. (2009). Decision making: A computer-science and information-technology viewpoint. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 7(2), 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breukelen, D. H. J., Vries, M. and Schure, F. A., (2016) Concept learning by direct current design challenges in secondary education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, P. (2003). The mind is a system of modules shaped by natural selection. In C. R. Hitchcock (Ed.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of science. New York: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J. (2007). The role of technology education in supporting a democratic literacy. Paper presented at technology education New Zealand, Biannual conference, Auckland 3–5 Oct 2007. Retrieved 25 June 2009, from: http://www.tenz.org.nz/2007/2007-conference-papers.htm

  • Compton, V. J. (2013). Technological literacy: Implications for teaching and learning – Final report to ministry of education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2010). Technological knowledge and the nature of technology: Implications for teaching and learning – Summary of final report. Retrieved 13 May 2016 from: technology.tki.org.nz/index.php/content/…/TKNOT-Implications.docx

  • Compton, A., & Compton, V. J. (2011a). Strategies for progressing student understanding of the characteristics of technology. Published in conference proceedings of technology education New Zealand, 8th biennial conference. Dunedin. 26–28 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2011b). Strategies for progressing student understanding of technological modelling. Published in conference proceedings of technology education New Zealand, 8th biennial conference. Dunedin. 26–28 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2013a). Teaching technological knowledge: Determining and supporting student learning of the technological concepts. International Journal of Design and Technology Education, 23(3), 637–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Compton, A. (2013b). Teaching the nature of technology: Determining and supporting student learning of the philosophy of technology. International Journal of Design and Technology Education., 23(2), 229–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & France, B. (2007). Redefining technological literacy in New Zealand: From concepts to curriculum constructs. Proceedings of the Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology (PATT 18). International design and technology education conference: Teaching and learning technological literacy in the classroom (pp. 260–272). Glasgow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2001). Developing technological literacy: A framework for technology education in New Zealand. Published in conference proceedings of Technology Education New Zealand, Biannual conference (pp. 39–54). Wellington. 1–3 Oct 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2004). Technology education achievement standards: Are they fit for the purpose? Published in peer reviewed conference proceedings from the 3rd biennial international conference on technology education research. Learning for Innovation in Technology Education (Vol. 1, pp. 140–149). Gold Coast: Crowne Plaza Hotel Surfers Paradise. 9–11 Dec 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2005). Progression in technology education in New Zealand: Components of practice as a way forward. International Journal of Design and Technology Education., 15(3), 253–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Compton, V. J., & Harwood, C. D. (2008). Discussion document: Design ideas for future technology programmes. Retrieved 10 Jan 2009 from: http://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/content/download/482/3705/file/technology-design-ideas.doc

  • Compton, V. J., Compton, A., & Patterson, M. (2011). Exploring the transformatory potential of technological literacy. Proceedings of the joint Pupils’ Attitudes Towards Technology international design and technology education conference and Creativity in Primary Technology conference (PATT 25/CRIPT 8). London. 1–5 July 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmose, S., & Roth, W.-M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in a risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37, 11–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrand, F. (2007). Natural decision. In B. Hardy-Vallée (Ed.), Cognitive decision making: Empirical and foundational issues (pp. 1–14). Cambridge Scholars Publishing: Newcastle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., Crowell, N. A., & Kipke, M. (1999). Adolescent decision making: Implications for prevention programs. Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED441185).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galotti, K. M. (2002). Teaching reasoning and decision-making in introductory cognitive science courses. Retrieved 23 Apr 2011 from: http://www.linguistics.pomona.edu/Hewlettcognitivescience/essays/assets/GalottiReasoning.pdf

  • Greeno, J. (1997). Theories and practices of thinking and learning to think. American Journal of Education, 106(1), 85–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallstrom, J., & Gyberg, P. (2009). Technology in the rear-view mirror: How to better incorporate the history of technology into technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 21(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy-Vallée, B. (2007). Cognitive decision-making: Empirical and foundational issues. New Castle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2009). Practical aspects of theoretical reasoning. Retrieved 23 Dec 2009 from: http://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&q=cache:w0VnxNSjylkJ:citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download%3Fdoi%3D10.1.1.94.9271%26rep%3Drep1%26type%3Dpdf+practical+reasoning+pdf&hl=en&gl=nz&pid=bl&srcid=ADGEEShm1zepQF9w5fFwAnq8k1EwxWVuszsBsM3IdCn0JcGIpp2ATDMRimOggy52OB5VqzKOsTRlTF1q_-Rd6Zxiocoy8qsekB15i6xvURP4b60TwHrYOoRxZ5YoZ4DS7FAK38w0_s0&sig=AHIEtbQLrqDBm71DidM38me2tn92LOx-_w

  • Harwood, C. D. (2014). Enhancing student decision making in technological practice: A thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Education. Palmerston North: Massey University. Retrieved 13 May 2016 from: http://mro.massey.ac.nz/handle/10179/5494#sthash.jLEZcniI.dpuf

  • Johnson, S. D. (1997). Learning technological concepts and developing intellectual skills. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(1–2), 161–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keirl, S. (2006). Ethical technological literacy as democratic curriculum keystone. Chapter 6. In J. Dakers (Ed.), Defining technological literacy: Towards an epistemological framework (pp. 81–102). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice. Mind, mathematics and culture in everyday life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2008). How can decision making be improved? Retrieved 2 Jan 2010, from: http://www.hbs.edu/research/pdf/08-102.pdf

  • Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Fostering innovation to address social challenges. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/47861327.pdf

  • OECD. (2012). Innovation for development a discussion of the issues and an overview of work of the OECD directorate for science, technology and industry. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: http://www.oecd.org/innovation/inno/50586251.pdf

  • OECD. (2015). OECD innovation strategy 2015 an agenda for policy action. Retrieved 2 Jan 2016 from: https://www.oecd.org/sti/OECD-Innovation-Strategy-2015-CMIN2015-7.pdf

  • Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychology, 35(4), 227–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, & Hope, G. (2009). Beyond knowing how to make it work: The conceptual foundations of designing. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1999). Moral explanation and moral objectivity. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58(1), 175–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E. (2009). Testing teacher knowledge for technology in primary schools. Published doctoral thesis. Eindhoven University of Technology, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohaan, E., Taconis, R., & Jochems, W. M. G. (2010). Reviewing the relations between teachers’ knowledge and pupils’ attitude in the field of primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20, 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowell, P. (2004). Developing technological stance: Children’s learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 45–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skovmose, O. (1998). Linking mathematics education and democracy: Citizenship, mathematical archaelology, mathemacy and deliberative interaction. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 30(6), 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (1990). Promoting individuality and originality. In L. Tickle (Ed.), Design and technology in primary classrooms. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, M. J. (2013). Understanding technology structure and function. In J. Hallstrom & C. Klasander (Eds.), The Ginner handbook of technology education. Some theses about technology, school and society (pp. 156–166). Sweden: Elanders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheelahan, L. (2010). Why knowledge matters in curriculum: A social realist argument. In New studies in critical realism and education. Oxfordshire: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Chanel College, Masterton, New Zealand

    Cliff Harwood

  2. Ministry for Primary Industries, Wellington, New Zealand

    Vicki J. Compton

Authors
  1. Cliff Harwood
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicki J. Compton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cliff Harwood .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Science Education and Communication, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands

    Marc J. de Vries

Section Editor information

  1. School of Education, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

    John Williams

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Harwood, C., Compton, V.J. (2018). The Importance of the Conceptual in Progressing Technology Teaching and Learning. In: de Vries, M. (eds) Handbook of Technology Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44687-5_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation