Advertisement

Child Daycare Workers

  • Marjolein Wintzen
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Occupational dermatitis in child daycare workers is mostly hand dermatitis.

Hand dermatitis in daycare employees is mostly of irritant nature and due to water, soap, and disinfectants.

Handling food, particularly fruit and dairy products, may cause contact urticaria or protein contact dermatitis.

The use of latex or rubber gloves may induce irritant as well as allergic contact dermatitis.

Skin care and sanitizing products are an important source of contact allergens, most prominently fragrances, preservatives, and increasingly cocamidopropylbetaine.

Keywords

Daycare Nursing Children Baby/babies Hand dermatitis Skin care 

References

  1. Beene KM, Scheman A, Severson D, Reeder MJ (2017) Prevalence of preservatives across all product types in the contact allergen management program. Dermatitis 28:81–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. de Groot AC, Frosch PJ (2010) Patch test concentrations and vehicles for testing contact allergens. In: Duus Johansen J, Frosch PJ, LePoittevin J-P (eds) Contact dermatitis, 5th edn. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  3. Giménez-Arnau AM, Deza G, Bauer A, Johnston GA, Mahler V, Schuttelaar ML, Sanchez-Perez J, Silvestre JF, Wilkinson M, Uter W (2017) Contact allergy to preservatives: ESSCA results with the baseline series, 2009–2012. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 31:664–671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Herbst RA, Uter W, Pirker C, Geier J, Frosch PJ (2009) Allergic and non-allergic periorbital dermatitis: patch test results of the information network of the departments of dermatology during a 5-year period. Contact Dermatitis 51:13–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Holmes SJ, Morrow AL, Pickering LK (1996) Child-care practices: effects of social change on the epidemiology of infectious diseases and antibiotic resistance. Epidemiol Rev 18(1):10–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Isaksson M, Ale I, Andersen KE, Elsner P, Goh CL, Goossens A, Jerajani H, Matsunaga K, McFadden J, Bruze M (2017) Multicenter patch testing with methylisothiazolinone and methylchloroisothiazolinone/methylisothiazolinone within the international contact dermatitis research group. Dermatitis 28:210–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Jacob SE, Amini S (2008) Cocamidopropyl betaine. Dermatitis 19(3):157–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Jaton L, Pillonel T, Jaton K, Dory E, Prod’hom G, Blanc DS, Tissot F, Bodenmann P, Greub G (2016) Common skin infection due to Panton-Valentine leucocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus strains in asylum seekers from Eritrea: a genome-based investigation of a suspected outbreak. Clin Microbiol Infect 22(8):739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mashiah J, Kutz A, Ben Ami R, Savion M, Goldberg I, Gan Or T, Zidan O, Sprecher E, Harel A (2016) Tinea capitis outbreak among paediatric refugee population, an evolving healthcare challenge. Mycoses 59(9):553–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Schulze-Dirks A, Frosch PJ (1988) Contact allergy to dexpanthenol. Hautarzt 39(6):375–377PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Sheeran C, Cahill J, Nixon R (2014) Glove-related hand urticaria caused by disposable gloves in healthcare workers. Contact Dermatitis 71(2):115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Sherertz EF (1992) A survey of skin problems in day-care workers. Contact Dermatitis 27:55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Strohbehn C, Sneed J, Paez P, Meyer J (2008) Hand washing frequencies and procedures used in retail food services. J Food Prot 71(8):1641–1650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tenover FC, Goering RV (2009) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strain USA300: origin and epidemiology. J Antimicrob Chemother 64:441–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. van Oosten EJ, Schuttelaar MLA, Coenraads PJ (2009) Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances. Contact Dermatitis 61:217–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Warshaw EM, Aschenbeck KA, Zug KA, Belsito DV, Zirwas MJ, Fowler JF Jr, Taylor JS, Sasseville D, Fransway AF, DeLeo VA, Marks JG Jr, Pratt MD, Maibach HI, Mathias CG, DeKoven JG (2017) Wet wipe allergens: retrospective analysis form the north American contact dermatitis group 2011–2014. Dermatitis 28:64–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of DermatologyVUmc Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations