Advertisement

Batik Manufacturing Workers

  • Retno W. Soebaryo
  • Windy Keumala Budianti
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Batik is an intangible cultural heritage from Indonesia, designated by UNESCO in 2009. Batik has been both an art and craft for centuries. Especially for some parts of Indonesia, batik is not only a popular decorated textile but has a deeper philosophy. The production process is complicated, and the drawing process of the liquid wax needs a special tool called “canting.” Most of batik production is an informal or home industry, and the workers had low to medium education level. Batik workers are usually loyal to the job and will be passed down the skill unformally among generations. Batik process needs some supplies that could act as irritant and/or allergens and could have an impact on personal health and environment.

Results of several studies revealed that most workers had more than 10 years duration of work, and the first step of batik process is done by women, between 20 and 50 years of age, at their own home, and the following steps are mostly done by men. Glove is usually the only personal protective equipment (PPE) used by the workers. The proportion between dermatitis and non-dermatitis skin impairment is about 18.2% by 65.5%. There is a positive correlation between the use of PPE and handwashing with the occurrence of contact dermatitis. The most frequent non-dermatitis found was callus, probably cause by repeated friction. Irritant contact dermatitis is more common than allergic contact dermatitis that mostly caused by colorant and wet environment.

Health and environment improvement programs had been implemented with the key point in education.

Keywords

Batik Canting Natural dyes Synthetic dyes Indigo Naphthol Dermatitis Irritant contact dermatitis Allergic contact dermatitis Callus Personal protective equipment/PPE Waste disposal 

Notes

Acknowledgments

High appreciation to Mutiara Ramadhiani, MD for her assistance in preparing the manuscript.

References

  1. Budianti WK (2010) Positivity proportion of Naphtol 1% patch test and the association with behaviour determinant among batik traditional workers. Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas IndonesiaGoogle Scholar
  2. De Carvallo MG et al. Assessment of the Mathias criteria for establishing occupational causation of contact dermatitis. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2012; 103(5):411–421Google Scholar
  3. Febriana SA et al (2016) Identification of occupational and environmental hazard and occupational skin diseases in Batik Home Industry. Presented at the European Academy of Contact Dermatitis, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  4. Felaza E (2014) Conserving Indonesia’s nature and culture through empowerment of indigenous technology in creative industry SMEs. In: Proceedings of the 14th Indonesian Scholars International ConventionGoogle Scholar
  5. Goetz C (2008) Textile dyes: techniques and their effects on the environment with a recommendation for dyers concerning the green effect. Thesis, Honors Program Liberty UniversityGoogle Scholar
  6. Indonesian Batik (2008) A cultural beauty. Ministry of trade republic of Indonesia, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  7. Lestari F, Sutojo US Pudjiastuti W et al (2007) Health risk assessment among batik workers. Presented at Asia Pacific symposium on current issues in public health in Indonesia, JakartaGoogle Scholar
  8. Markkanen PK (2004) Occupational Safety and Health in Indonesia. Working paper 9. International Labour OrganizationGoogle Scholar
  9. Niken I (2007) Natural dyes used in traditional batik processing (in Indonesia). Presented in the annual meeting of the Indonesian Society of Dermato-venereology, SurabayaGoogle Scholar
  10. Rum S, Pinta H (2013) Empowerment of female batik worker on the development of batik industry in Sragen: case study at Wisata Kliwonan Village subdistrict Masaran. Int J Humanit Soc Sci 3(11):122–129Google Scholar
  11. Shalock PC, Zug KA (2007) Protection from occupational allergens. In: Schliemann S, Peter E (eds) Skin protection. 34, Current problems in dermatology. Karger, Basel, pp 58–75Google Scholar
  12. Sulaksono A (2015) Wastewater pollution load from Batik Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs). In: Trusmi cluster, Cirebon District. Thesis, Bogor Agricultural UniversityGoogle Scholar
  13. Suryadini Y (2012) Promoting and implementing sustainable production in Batik Industry in Indonesia. Clean Batik Initiative – switchasia network facilities. www.cleanbatik.com
  14. Widodo S (2009) Influence of several factors on the occurrence of contact dermatitis in coloring section in batik factory (in Indonesia). Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, University of Diponegoro, SemarangGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatology and VenereologyUniversitas IndonesiaJakartaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations