Skip to main content

Developmental Homology

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Abstract

Homology is the fundamental determinant of the sameness of biological characters or traits. When two characters stand in a relation of homology, they belong to the same character kind. For example, the eyes of humans and birds are homologous as vertebrate eyes – that is, they are the same kind of character: vertebrate eyes. Although the concept of homology originated in pre-Darwinian comparative anatomy, it was subsequently revealed to be an evolutionary phenomenon caused by common descent. Contemporary investigators work roughly within the following generic evolutionary conception of homology:

  • Homology: Two characters in distinct organisms or taxa are homologous if they are genealogically connected by continuous descent from a common ancestor that had the same character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abouheif E (1999) Establishing homology criteria for regulatory gene networks: prospects and challenges. In: Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) Homology, novartis foundation symposium, vol 222. Wiley, Chichester, pp 207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Amundson R (2005) The changing role of the embryo in evolutionary thought: roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bock WJ (1974) Philosophical foundations of classical evolutionary classification. Syst Zool 22:375–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bock GR, Cardew G (eds) (1999) Homology, novartis foundation symposium, vol 222. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigandt I (2007) Typology now: homology and developmental constraints explain evolvability. Biol Philos 22:709–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert SF, Bolker JA (2001) Homologies of process and modular elements of embryonic construction. In: Wagner G (ed) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic, San Diego, pp 437–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould SJ, Lewontin RC (1979) The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A Critique of the Adaptationist Programme. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 205:581–598

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall BK (2003) Decent with modification: the unity underlying homology and homoplasy as seen through an analysis of development and evolution. Biol Rev 78:409–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine N (1969) The observational and theoretical components of homology: a study based on the morphology of the dermal skull-roofs of rhipidistian fishes. Biol J Linn Soc 1:327–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr E (1982) The growth of biological thought. Cambridge UP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McGhee G (2011) Convergent evolution: limited forms most beautiful. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, McNamara KJ (1991) Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minelli A (1998) Molecules, developmental modules, and phenotypes: a combinatorial approach to homology. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9(3):340–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB (2003) Homology: the evolution of morphological organization. In: Müller GB, Newman SA (eds) Origination of organismal form: beyond the gene in developmental and evolutionary biology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB (2007) Evo-devo: extending the evolutionary synthesis. Nature Reviews Genetics 8: 943–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Newman SA (1999) Generation, integration, autonomy: Three steps in the evolution of homology. In: Bock, G. R. and G. Cardew. (eds.) 65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Nuño de la Rosa L, Etxeberria A (2009) Pattern and process in evo-devo: descriptions and explanations. In: H. W. de Regt et al (eds) EPSA Philosophy of Science, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen R (1843) Lectures on the comparative anatomy and physiology of the invertebrate animals. Delivered at the Royal College of Surgeons, in 1843. Longman, Brown, Green, and Longmans, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson C (1982) Morphological characters and homology. In: Joysey KA, Friday AE (eds) Problems in phylogenetic reconstruction. Academic, London, pp 21–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Quiring R, Walldorf U, Kloter U, Gehring WJ (1994) Homology of the eyeless gene of Drosophila to the small eye gene in mice and Aniridia in humans. Science 265(5173):785–789

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey G, Peterson AS (2012) Sameness in biology. Philos Sci 79(2):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remane A (1956) Die Grundlagen des natürlichen Systems, der vergleichenden Anatomie und der Phylogenetik. Geest and Portig, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedl R (1978) Order in living organisms: a systems analysis of evolution (trans: Jefferies RPS). Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth VL (1984) On homology. Biol J Linn Soc 22:13–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth VL (1988) The biological basis of homology. In: Humphries CJ (ed) Ontogeny and systematics. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 1–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth VL (1991) Homology and hierarchies: problems solved and unresolved. J Evol Biol 4:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholtz G (2005) Homology and ontogeny: pattern and process in comparative developmental biology. Theory in Biosciences 124(2):121–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S (1997) Fossils, genes, and the evolution of animal limbs. Nature 388:639–648

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shubin N, Tabin C, Carroll S (2009) Deep homology and the origins of evolutionary novelty. Nature 457:818–823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Van Valen L (1982) Homology and causes. J Morphol 173:305–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GPW (1989a) The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. Evolution 43(6):1157–1171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GPW (1989b) The biological homology concept. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20(1):51–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner GPW (2014) Homology, genes, and evolutionary innovation. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB (1991) Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations? The American Naturalist 138(3):543–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wake DB (1994) Comparative terminology. Science 265:268–269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wray GA, Abouheif E (1998) When is homology not homology? Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:675–680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James DiFrisco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DiFrisco, J. (2019). Developmental Homology. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_74-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_74-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics