Skip to main content

Approved Products in the USA: AxiaLIF

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Spine Technology

Abstract

Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) was a device used to treat instability and disc degeneration in L4-L5 and L5-S1. Through a paracoccygeal incision and presacral approach, muscular and ligamentous dissection could be avoided. The discectomy and instrumentation was performed through via trans-sacral rod. AxiaLIF was approved in 2004 through a 510 (k) clearance from a predicate device which was an anterior thoracolumbar plate for trauma and deemed a class 2 device with a moderate risk to the patient. While early studies had encouraging results in terms of fusion rates and improvement in clinical outcome measures, most also had a conflict of interest. As the technology was rapidly adopted, the first reports of complications which were visceral injuries emerged casting doubt onto its effectiveness. Only a handful of studies focused on the long-term fusion rate, restoration of lordosis, and indirect decompression. In retrospect, it is apparent that the 510 (k) clearance and classification of the device was incorrect because the predicate was not substantially equivalent to the existing device. The experience with AxiaLIF provides a cautionary tale about new technology – that it should be safe, clinically effective, and have long-term data prior to rapid adoption.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB (2008) Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21(7):459–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Rosemann R, Khalsa B, Baron EM (2010) Mid-term to long-term clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive correction and fusion for adults with scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28(3):E6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S (2013) Long-term 2- to 5-year clinical and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for adult scoliosis. Spine 38(18):1566–1575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B (2014a) Does minimally invasive transsacral fixation provide anterior column support in adult scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(6):1769–1775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B (2014b) Is circumferential minimally invasive surgery effective in the treatment of moderate adult idiopathic scoliosis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472(6):1762–1768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Baron EM, Khandehroo B (2014c) Limitations and ceiling effects with circumferential minimally invasive correction techniques for adult scoliosis: analysis of radiological outcomes over a 7-year experience. Neurosurg Focus 36(5):E14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Cohen JE, Cohen RB, Khandehroo B, Kahwaty S, Baron E (2017) Comparison of a newer versus older protocol for circumferential minimally invasive surgical (CMIS) correction of adult spinal deformity (ASD)-evolution over a 10-year experience. Spine Deform 5(3):213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Alayan A, Cohen J, Cohen R, Khandehroo B (2018) Clinical and radiologic fate of the lumbosacral junction after anterior lumbar interbody fusion versus axial lumbar interbody fusion at the bottom of a long construct in CMIS treatment of adult spinal deformity. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2(10):e067

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aryan HE, Newman CB, Gold JJ, Acosta FL Jr, Coover C, Ames CP (2008) Percutaneous axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) of the L5-S1 segment: initial clinical and radiographic experience. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: MIN 51(4):225–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bisschop A, van Tulder MW (2016) Market approval processes for new types of spinal devices: challenges and recommendations for improvement. Eur Spine J 25(9):2993–3003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boachie-Adjei O, Cho W, King AB (2013) Axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) approach for adult scoliosis. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 2):S225–S231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botolin S, Agudelo J, Dwyer A, Patel V, Burger E (2010) High rectal injury during trans-1 axial lumbar interbody fusion L5-S1 fixation: a case report. Spine 35(4):E144–E148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glassman SD, Bridwell K, Dimar JR, Horton W, Berven S, Schwab F (2005) The impact of positive sagittal balance in adult spinal deformity. Spine 30(18):2024–2029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton D, Howie C, Gaston P, Simpson H (2012) Scott’s parabola and the rise and fall of metal-on-metal hip replacements. BMJ: Br Med J 345:e8306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herndon JH, Hwang R, Bozic KJ (2007) Healthcare technology and technology assessment. Eur Spine J 16(8):1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter CP, James AR, Hartl R (2011) Revision strategies for AxiaLIF. Neurosurg Focus 31(4):E17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter CP, Shin B, Tsiouris AJ, Elowitz E, Hartl R (2013) Radiographic and clinical outcome after 1- and 2-level transsacral axial interbody fusion: clinical article. J Neurosurg Spine 19(4):454–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindley EM, McCullough MA, Burger EL, Brown CW, Patel VV (2011) Complications of axial lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg Spine 15(3):273–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marchi L, Oliveira L, Coutinho E, Pimenta L (2012) Results and complications after 2-level axial lumbar interbody fusion with a minimum 2-year follow-up. J Neurosurg Spine 17(3):187–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marotta N, Cosar M, Pimenta L, Khoo LT (2006) A novel minimally invasive presacral approach and instrumentation technique for anterior L5-S1 intervertebral discectomy and fusion: technical description and case presentations. Neurosurg Focus 20(1):E9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rapp SM, Miller LE, Block JE (2011) AxiaLIF system: minimally invasive device for presacral lumbar interbody spinal fusion. Med Devices (Auckland, NZ) 4:125–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin DJ, Longaker MT, Gertner M, Krummel TM (2006) Innovation in surgery: a historical perspective. Ann Surg 244(5):686–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder GD, Kepler CK, Vaccaro AR (2015) Axial interbody arthrodesis of the L5-S1 segment: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 23(3):314–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott JW (2001) Scott’s parabola: the rise and fall of a surgical technique. Br Med J 323:1477. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.323.7327.1477

  • Tobler WD, Melgar MA, Raley TJ, Anand N, Miller LE, Nasca RJ (2013) Clinical and radiographic outcomes with L4-S1 axial lumbar interbody fusion (AxiaLIF) and posterior instrumentation: a multicenter study. Med Devices (Auckland, NZ) 6:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeilstra DJ, Miller LE, Block JE (2013) Axial lumbar interbody fusion: a 6-year single-center experience. Clin Interv Aging 8:1063–1069

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franziska Anna Schmidt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Schmidt, F.A., Nangunoori, R., Wong, T., Kirnaz, S., Härtl, R. (2020). Approved Products in the USA: AxiaLIF. In: Cheng, B. (eds) Handbook of Spine Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33037-2_43-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33037-2_43-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33037-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33037-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics