Abstract
Endoscopic third ventriculostomy has become the preferred treatment for obstructive hydrocephalus. However, despite the creation of an alternative CSF pathway, ETV failure may occur.
ETV failure has three reasons: misinterpreting the primary condition as an obstructive, failure to absorb the CSF at the convexity subarachnoid space and arachnoid granulations, and closure of the stoma.
Stoma closure is considered the main reason for late failures. In most cases, a closed stoma by scar tissue is found. To date, there are no known risk factors for late ETV closure, but late failures do occur even years following the procedure.
Thus, all patients following an ETV, regardless to the primary reason of their hydrocephalus, are routinely followed with yearly clinical and ophthalmological evaluations. Patients and their families are alerted about relevant symptoms that may arise and suggest ETV failure. Additionally, we recommend routine surveillance MRI scans to screen for ETV closure. The parameters which we consider as important in evaluating ETV success include:
-
1.
Ventricular size
-
2.
Periventricular edema
-
3.
Ballooning of the third ventricle
-
4.
Flow void through the ETV stoma
-
5.
Convexity subarachnoid space
In this chapter, we review the pitfalls in diagnosing ETV closure, alternative imaging sequences which highlight the flow void through the ETV, timing of surgical treatment, and various treatment options at failure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Algin O, Ucar M, Ozmen E, Borcek AO, Ozisik P, Ocakoglu G, Tali ET (2015) Assessment of third ventriculostomy patency with the 3D-SPACE technique: a preliminary multicenter research study. J Neurosurg 122:1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.10.JNS14298
Bargallo N, Olondo L, Garcia AI, Capurro S, Caral L, Rumia J (2005) Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:2514–2521
Cinalli G et al (1999) Failure of third ventriculostomy in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis in children. J Neurosurg 90:448–454. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1999.90.3.0448
Cinalli G et al (2006) Intracranial pressure monitoring and lumbar puncture after endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children. Neurosurgery 58:126–136 discussion 126–136
Dincer A, Yildiz E, Kohan S, Memet Ozek M (2011) Analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy patency by MRI: value of different pulse sequences, the sequence parameters, and the imaging planes for investigation of flow void. Childs Nerv Syst 27:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-010-1219-6
Hader WJ, Drake J, Cochrane D, Sparrow O, Johnson ES, Kestle J (2002) Death after late failure of third ventriculostomy in children. Report of three cases. J Neurosurg 97:211–215. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0211
Hellwig D, Giordano M, Kappus C (2013) Redo third ventriculostomy. World Neurosurg 79:S22 e13–S22 e20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2012.02.006
Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Armstrong DC, Dirks PB (2000) Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 92:915–919. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0915
Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Kestle JR, Mallucci CL, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Pediatric Neurosurgery C, Study G (2010) Predicting who will benefit from endoscopic third ventriculostomy compared with shunt insertion in childhood hydrocephalus using the ETV success score. J Neurosurg Pediatr 6:310–315. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.8.PEDS103
Kulkarni AV, Sgouros S, Constantini S, Investigators I (2016) International infant hydrocephalus study: initial results of a prospective, multicenter comparison of endoscopic third ventriculostomy (ETV) and shunt for infant hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-016-3095-1
Lipina R, Palecek T, Reguli S, Kovarova M (2007) Death in consequence of late failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 23:815–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-007-0316-7
Mobbs RJ, Vonau M, Davies MA (2003) Death after late failure of endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a potential solution. Neurosurgery 53:384–385 discussion 385–386
Ozisik P, Roth J, Beni-Adani L, Constantini S (2011) Continuous spinal drain following endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a proposal to change the definition of failure. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1973–1978. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-011-1562-2
Schwartz TH, Yoon SS, Cutruzzola FW, Goodman RR (1996) Third ventriculostomy: post-operative ventricular size and outcome. Minim Invasive Neurosurg: MIN 39:122–129. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1052231
Siomin V et al (2001) Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: is it worth trying? Childs Nerv Syst 17:551–555. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003810100475
Stovell MG, Zakaria R, Ellenbogen JR, Gallagher MJ, Jenkinson MD, Hayhurst C, Mallucci CL (2016) Long-term follow-up of endoscopic third ventriculostomy performed in the pediatric population. J Neurosurg Pediatr 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.11.PEDS15212
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Roth, J., Ber, R., Constantini, S. (2019). Obstruction of Third Ventriculostomy. In: Cinalli, G., Ozek, M., Sainte-Rose, C. (eds) Pediatric Hydrocephalus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31889-9_84-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31889-9_84-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31889-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31889-9
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences