Skip to main content

Hydrocephalus in Pineal and Tectal Tumors

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 164 Accesses

Abstract

Pineal and tectal tumors are most common brain tumors causing obstruction of the aqueduct and required CSF diversion procedures. Success rate of ETV in this type of hydrocephalus is definitely high. In addition, endoscopic approach allows for sampling of CSF, direct visualization of the tumor with surrounding structures, and biopsy for decision-making of therapeutic strategy. Therefore, simultaneous ETV and endoscopic biopsy has become an important procedure lately. MR images of sagittal section, especially with high resolution, are extremely useful for preoperative evaluation. Combination of trajectory and type of endoscope (i.e., rigid-, fiber-, and videoscope) should be considered depending on changes in the ventricular anatomy as well as size of tumors and types of existing equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Al-Tamimi YZ, Bhargava D, Surash S et al (2008) Endoscopic biopsy during third ventriculostomy in paediatric pineal region tumours. Childs Nerv Syst 24:1323–1326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown JH, Saran FH (2005) Defining the optimal radiation therapy for secreting CNS germ cell tumors (SGCTS): a critical review of the literature. In: abstracts for the second international symposium on central nervous system germ cell tumors. Neuro-Oncology 7:513–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernov MF, Kamikawa S, Yamane F et al (2006) Neurofiberoptic biopsy of tumors of the pineal region and posterior third ventricle: indications, technique, complications, and results. Neurosurgery 59:267–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibbaro S, Di Rocco F, Makiese O et al (2012) Neuroendoscopic management of posterior third ventricle and pineal region tumors: technique, limitation, and possible complication avoidance. Neurosurg Rev 35:331–338

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Choi BK, Cha SH, Song GS et al (2007) Recurrent intracranial germinoma along the endoscopic ventriculostomy tract. J Neurosurg Pediatr 107:62–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli G, Spennato P, Savarese L et al (2006) Endoscopic aqueductoplasty and placement of a stent in the cerebral aqueduct in the management of isolated fourth ventricle in children. J Neurosurg 104:21–27

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cinalli G, Spennato P, Nastro A et al (2011) Hydrocephalus in aqueductal stenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1621–1642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantini S, Mohanty A, Zymberg S et al (2013) Safety and diagnostic accuracy of neuroendoscopic biopsies: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:704–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • da Silva LR, Cavalheiro S, Zymberg ST (2007) Endoscopic aqueductoplasty in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 23:1263–1268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dağlioğlu E, Cataltepe O, Akalan N (2003) Tectal gliomas in children: the implications for natural history and management strategy. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:223–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Depreitere B, Dasi N, Rutka J et al (2007) Endoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors in children. J Neurosurg 106(5 Suppl):340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rocco C, Pettorossi VE, Caldarelli M et al (1978) Communicating hydrocephalus induced by mechanically increased amplitude of the intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid pressure: experimental studies. Exp Neurol 59:40–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Rocco C, Di Trapani G, Pettorossi VE et al (1979) On the pathology of experimental hydrocephalus induced by artificial increase in endoventricular CSF pulse pressure. Childs Brain 5:81–95

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drake JM, Kestle JR, Milner R et al (1998) Randomized trial of cerebrospinal fluid shunt valve design in pediatric hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 43:294–303. discussion 303–305

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenbogen RG, Moores LE (1997) Endoscopic management of a pineal and suprasellar germinoma with associated hydrocephalus: technical case report. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 40:13–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Endo H, Fujimura M, Kumabe T et al (2009) Application of high-definition flexible neuroendoscopic system to the treatment of primary pineal malignant B-cell lymphoma. Surg Neurol 71:344–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ersahin Y (2007) Endoscopic aqueductoplasty. Childs Nerv Syst 23:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng H, Huang G, Liao X et al (2004) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of obstructive hydrocephalus: an outcome analysis. J Neurosurg 100:626–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrer E, Santamarta D, Garcia-Fructuoso G et al (1997) Neuroendoscopic management of pineal region tumours. Acta Neurochir 139:12–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch MJ, Schroeder HW (2013) Endoscopic aqueductoplasty and stenting. World Neurosurg 79(2 Suppl): S20.e15–S20.e18

    Google Scholar 

  • Gangemi M, Maiuri F, Colella G et al (2001) Endoscopic surgery for pineal region tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 44:70–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Greitz D (2004) Radiological assessment of hydrocephalus: new theories and implications for therapy. Neurosurg Rev 27:145–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greitz D, Greitz T (1997) The pathogenesis and hemodynamics of hydrocephalus. A proposal for a new understanding. Int J Neuroradiol 3:367–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Haw C, Steinbok P (2001) Ventriculoscope tract recurrence after endoscopic biopsy of pineal germinoma. Pediatr Neurosurg 34:215–217

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi N, Murai H, Ishihara S et al (2011) Nationwide investigation of the current status of therapeutic neuroendoscopy for ventricular and paraventricular tumors in Japan. J Neurosurg 115:1147–1157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig D, Grotenhuis JA, Tirakotai W et al (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for obstructive hydrocephalus. Neurosurg Rev 28:1–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig D, Giordano M, Kappus C (2013) Redo third ventriculostomy. World Neurosurg 79(2 Suppl):S22. e13–S22. e20

    Google Scholar 

  • Javadpour M, Mallucci C (2004) The role of neuroendoscopy in the management of tectal gliomas. Childs Nerv Syst 20:852–857

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kadrian D, van Gelder J, Florida D et al (2005) Long-term reliability of endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurgery 56:1271–1278. discussion 1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kestle J, Drake J, Milner R et al (2000) Long-term follow-up data from the shunt design trial. Pediatr Neurosurg 33:230–236

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kim IY, Jung S, Moon KS et al (2004) Neuronavigation-guided endoscopic surgery for pineal tumors with hydrocephalus. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 47:365–368

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Knaus H, Matthias S, Koch A et al (2011) Single burr hole endoscopic biopsy with third ventriculostomy-measurements and computer-assisted planning. Childs Nerv Syst 27:1233–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch D, Grunert P, Filippi R et al (2002) Re-ventriculostomy for treatment of obstructive hydrocephalus in cases of stoma dysfunction. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 45:158–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni AV, Drake JM, Mallucci CL et al (2009) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. J Pediatr 155:254–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laitt RD, Mallucci CL, Jaspan T et al (1999) Constructive interference in steady-state 3D Fourier-transform MRI in the management of hydrocephalus and third ventriculostomy. Neuroradiology 41:117–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li KW, Roonprapunt C, Lawson HC et al (2005) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus associated with tectal gliomas. Neurosurg Focus 18(6A):E2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luther N, Stetler WR Jr, Dunkel IJ et al (2010) Subarachnoid dissemination of intraventricular tumors following simultaneous endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:61–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May PL, Blaser SI, Hoffman HJ et al (1991) Benign intrinsic tectal “tumors” in children. J Neurosurg 74:867–871

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miwa T, Hayashi N, Endo S et al (2015) Neuroedoscopic biopsy and the treatment of tumor-associated hydrocephalus of the ventricular and paraventricular region in pediatric patients: a nationwide study in Japan. Neurosurg Rev 38:693–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty A, Vasudev MK, Sampath S et al (2002) Failed endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children: management options. Pediatr Neurosurg 37:304–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty A, Santosh V, Devi BI et al (2011) Efficacy of simultaneous single-trajectory endoscopic tumor biopsy and endoscopic cerebrospinal fluid diversion procedures in intra- and paraventricular tumors. Neurosurg Focus 30(4):E4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern PF, Souweidane MM (2013) Pineal region tumors: simultaneous endoscopic third ventriculostomy and tumor biopsy. World Neurosurg 79(2 Suppl):S18.e9–S18.13

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenstern PF, Osbun N, Schwartz TH et al (2011) Pineal region tumors: an optimal approach for simultaneous endoscopic third ventriculostomy and biopsy. Neurosurg Focus 30:E3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiyama K, Natori Y, Oka K (2014) A novel three-dimensional and high-definition flexible scope. Acta Neurochir 156:1245–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien DF, Hayhurst C, Pizer B et al (2006) Outcomes in patients undergoing single-trajectory endoscopic third ventriculostomy and endoscopic biopsy for midline tumors presenting with obstructive hydrocephalus. J Neurosurg 105:219–226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oertel JM, Baldauf J, Schroeder HW et al (2009) Endoscopic options in children: experience with 134 procedures. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 3:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oi S, Shibata M, Tominaga J et al (2000) Efficacy of neuroendoscopic procedures in minimally invasive preferential management of pineal region tumors: a prospective study. J Neurosurg 93:245–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oka K (2008) Introduction of the videoscope in neurosurgery. Neurosurgery 62(5 Suppl 2):ONS337–ONS340. discussion ONS341

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oka K, Kin Y, Go Y et al (1999) Neuroendoscopic approach to tectal tumors: a consecutive series. J Neurosurg 91:964–970

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oppido PA, Fiorindi A, Benvenuti L et al (2011) Neuroendoscopic biopsy of ventricular tumors: a multicentric experience. Neurosurg Focus 30(4):E2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pople IK, Athanasiou TC, Sandeman DR et al (2001) The role of endoscopic biopsy and third ventriculostomy in the management of pineal region tumours. Br J Neurosurg 15:305–301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Romeo A, Naftel RP, Griessenauer CJ et al (2013) Long-term change in ventricular size following endoscopic third ventriculostomy for hydrocephalus due to tectal plate gliomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:20–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld J, Murphy M, Chow C (1990) Implantation metastasis of pineoblastoma after stereotactic biopsy. J Neurosurg 73:287–290

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roth J, Constantini S (2015) Combined rigid and flexible endoscopy for tumors in the posterior third ventricle. J Neurosurg 122:1341–1346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacko O, Boetto S, Lauwers-Cances V et al (2010) Endoscopic third ventriculostomy: outcome analysis in 368 procedures. Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 5:68–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sagan LM, Kojder I, Poncyljusz W (2006) Endoscopic aque- ductal stent placement for the treatment of a trapped fourth ventricle. J Neurosurg 105:275–280

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder HW, Schweim C, Schweim KH et al (2000) Analysis of aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic aqueductoplasty by using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 93:237–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder HW, Oertel J, Gaab MR (2004) Endoscopic aqueductoplasty in the treatment of aqueductal stenosis. Childs Nerv Syst 20:821–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder C, Fleck S, Gaab MR et al (2012) Why does endoscopic aqueductoplasty fail so frequently? Analysis of cerebrospinal fluid flow after endoscopic third ventriculostomy and aqueductoplasty using cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 117:141–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shono T, Natori Y, Morioka T et al (2007) Results of a long-term follow-up after neu- roendoscopic biopsy procedure and third ventriculostomy in patients with intracranial germinomas. J Neurosurg 107(3 Suppl):193–198

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Siomin V, Weiner H, Wisoff J et al (2001) Repeat endoscopic third ventriculostomy: is it worth trying? Childs Nerv Syst 17:551–555

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song JH, Kong DS, Shin HJ (2010) Feasibility of neuroendoscopic biopsy of pediatric brain tumor. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1593–1598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark AM, Fritsch MJ, Claviez A et al (2005) Management of tectal glioma in childhood. Pediatr Neurol 33:33–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Surash S, Chumas P, Bhargava D et al (2010) A retrospective analysis of revision endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Childs Nerv Syst 26:1693–1698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talamonti G, Ligarotti GK, Bramerio M et al (2013) Unusual behaviour of a pineal germinoma mimicking neurosarcoidosis and metastasising alongthe endoscopic route. BMJ Case Rep 2. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-200278

  • Ternier J, Wray A, Puget S et al (2006) Tectal plate lesions in children. J Neurosurg 104(6 Suppl):369–376

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Veto F, Horváth Z, Dóczi T (1997) Biportal endoscopic management of third ventricle tumors in patients with occlusive hydrocephalus: technical note. Neurosurgery 40:871–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wellons JC III, Tubbs RS, Banks JT et al (2002) Long-term control of hydrocephalus via endoscopic third ventriculostomy in children with tectal plate gliomas. Neurosurgery 51:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong TT, Chen HH, Liang ML et al (2011) Neuroendoscopy in the management of pineal tumors. Childs Nerv Syst 27:949–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Miyazaki M, Kanazawa H et al (2008) Visualization of cerebrospinal fluid movement with spin labeling at MR imaging: preliminary results in normal and pathophysiologic conditions. Radiology 249:644–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Tsuchiya K, Bradley WG et al (2015) Current and emerging MR imaging techniques for the diagnosis and management of CSF flow disorders: a review of phase-contrast and time-spatial labeling inversion pulse. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 36:623–630

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yamini B, Refai D, Rubin CM et al (2004) Initial endoscopic management of pineal region tumors and associated hydrocephalus: clinical series and literature review. J Neurosurg 100:437–441

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh DD, Warnick RE, Ernst RJ (2002) Management strategy for adult patients with dorsal midbrain gliomas. Neurosurgery 50:735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yurtseven T, Ersahin Y, Demirtas E et al (2003) Neuroendoscopic biopsy for intraventricular tumors. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 46:293–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichi Nishiyama .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Nishiyama, K. (2018). Hydrocephalus in Pineal and Tectal Tumors. In: Cinalli, G., Ozek, M., Sainte-Rose, C. (eds) Pediatric Hydrocephalus. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31889-9_56-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31889-9_56-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31889-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31889-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics