Organizational Structure and Crisis Management
Organizational structure refers to the coordination of positions, operational procedures, and strategies within an organization. Organizational structure can also commonly refer to the system of task and authority relationships that assist an organization’s staff in maintaining coordination and control over their actions, while contributing to the achievement of common goals and objectives. Crisis management is the process of preparing for, mitigating, responding to, recovering from, and learning from emergency incidents. Crisis management can also be defined as the managerial functions and practices that attempt to expand upon strategies needed in times of emergency by involving a proactive perspective to risk assessment.
Organizational crisis can be defined as a scenario that is highly improbable, yet highly consequential, to...
- Coombs WT, Holladay SJ (eds) (2012) The handbook of crisis communication. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
- Daft RL (2010) Organization theory and design, 10th edn. South-Western, Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
- Jones GR (2010) Organization theory, design, and change. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- Mitroff II (2004) Crisis leadership: planning for the unthinkable. Wiley, IndianapolisGoogle Scholar
- Pearson CM, Clair JA (1998) Reframing crisis management. Acad Manag Rev 23:1Google Scholar
- Porter M (2008) The five competitive forces that shape strategy. HARVARD BUS REV 86:1Google Scholar
- Quarantelli EL (2006) Catastrophes are different from disasters: some implications for crisis planning and managing drawn from Katrina. Retrieved from: http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli/
- Seeger MW, Sellnow TL, Ulmer RR (1998) Communication, organization and crisis. Ann Int Comm Assoc 21:1Google Scholar
- Zdziarski EL II (2006) Crisis in the context of higher education. In: Harper KS, Paterson BG, Zdziarski II EL (eds) Crisis management: responding from the heart. National Association of Student Personnel Administrators, Washington, DC, pp 3–24Google Scholar