Skip to main content

Bureaucracy and Politicians Relations

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 1235 Accesses

Synonyms

Bureaucracy and democracy; Political control of bureaucracy; Politicization of bureaucracy; Politics, power, and bureaucracy; Politics-administration dichotomy

Definition

Bureaucracy:

Bureaucracy is a system of official rules or state apparatus that plays a vital role in policy formulation, implementation, and delivering public services to the citizens.

Politicians:

Politicians are the actors or players of power game, and the persons those who are professionally involved in politics, and elected by the people and hold an elected office in the system of government.

Relations:

The relations can be defined as the process and manner of power relationships among the actors of governance. It refers to the mode of interaction between politicians and bureaucrats.

Introduction

Politicians and bureaucrats, these two actors are always inseparable and indispensable to each other. It may even be argued that from ancient civilization to the present globalized age, they have been at the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberbach JD, Putnam RD, Rockman BA (1981) Bureaucrats and politicians in Western democracies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond GA, Verba S (1963) The civic culture. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bjorkman JW (1979) Politics of administrative alienation. Ajanta Publications, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Carino LV (2001) Regime changes, the bureaucracy, and political development. In: Farazmand A (ed) Handbook of comparative and development public administration, 2nd edn. Mercel Dekker, New York, pp 1053–1064

    Google Scholar 

  • Demir T, Nyhan RC (2008) The politics-administration dichotomy: an empirical search for correspondence between theory and practice. Public Adm Rev 68(1):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir T, Reddick CG, Nank R (2015) The relationship between public service values and administrative involvement in policymaking. Public Organ Rev 15(2):79–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drewry G, Butcher T (1991) The civil service today, 2nd edn. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand A (1997) Professionalism, bureaucracy, and modern governance: a comparative analysis. In: Farazmand A (ed) Modern systems of government. SAGE Publications, Inc., London

    Google Scholar 

  • Farazmand A (2009) Bureaucracy, administration and politics: an introduction. In: Farazmand A (ed) Bureaucracy and administration. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 1–15

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen DI (2001) Are the relations between politicians and administrators at the local level determined by the degree of central government regulations? Paper presented at ECPR joint sessions of workshops, Grenoble, April 2001, workshop no. 21: “Local Autonomy and Local Democracy”, Norway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil I (2007) Administrative culture in Bangladesh. AHD Publishing House, Dhaka

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari S, Roy R (1969) Relations between politicians and administrators at the district level. Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Montjoy RS, Watson DJ (1995) A case for reinterpretation dichotomy of politics and administration as a professional standard in council-manager government. Public Adm Rev 55(3):231–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian J (1994) Reflections of a “pracademic” on the politics and administration. Public Adm Rev 54(6):531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian J (2006) Politics and administration in local government. Int J Public Admin 29(12):1049–1063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter DC (1986) India’s political administrators 1919–83. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouban L (2007) Politicization of the civil service. In: Peters BG, Pierre J (eds) Handbook of public administration. Sage, London, pp 380–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara JH (2001) The myth of the dichotomy: complementarity of politics and administration in the past and future of public administration. Public Adm Rev 61:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svara JH (2006a) Complexity in the political-administrative relations and the limits of the dichotomy concept. Adm Theory Prax 28(1):121–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara JH (2006b) Introduction: politicians and administrators in the political process – a review of themes and issues in the literature. Int J Public Adm 29(12):953–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1946) Bureaucracy. In: Gerth HH, Mills CW (eds) From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1958) Politics as a vocation. In: Gerth HH, Mills CW (eds) From Max Weber: essays in sociology. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1989) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do it. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Sayadur Rahman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Rahman, M.S. (2017). Bureaucracy and Politicians Relations. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_695-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_695-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics