Performance Information in Evidence-Based Management

  • Liang MaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3746-1

Synonyms

Definition

Performance information in evidence-based management refers to the purposeful and systematic use of scientific and/or qualitative evidence about organizational and program performance in managerial and policy decision-making in order to design and implement evidence-based policies and to improve organizational and program performance.

Introduction

The traditional and stereotyped view of management in public organizations is that it is primarily an art or craft difficult to explicitly elaborate and learn. In this conceptualization of public management, managers use their own personal experience and judgments to make decisions critical to organizational survival and success. They may also pay attention to...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Cairney P (2016) The politics of evidence-based policy making. Palgrave Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  2. Grimmelikhuijsen S, Jilke S, Olsen AL, Tummers L (2017) Behavioral public administration: combining insights from public administration and psychology. Public Adm Rev 77(1):45–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Halpern D (2015) Inside the nudge unit: how small changes can make a big difference. WH Allen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Heinrich CJ (2007) Evidence-based policy and performance management: challenges and prospects in two parallel movements. Am Rev Public Adm 37(3):255–277.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074007301957CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kroll A (2013) The other type of performance information: nonroutine feedback, its relevance and use. Public Adm Rev 73(2):265–276.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02648.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kroll A (2015) Drivers of performance information use: systematic literature review and directions for future research. Public Perform Manag Rev 38(3):459–486.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1006469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Moynihan DP, Pandey SK (2010) The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? J Public Adm Res Theory 20(4):849–866.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Pfeffer J, Sutton RI (2006) Hard facts, dangerous half-truths and total nonsense: profiting from evidence-based management. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. van Dooren W, Bouckaert G, Halligan J (2015) Performance management in the public sector, 2nd edn. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Weiss CH (1979) The many meanings of research utilization. Public Adm Rev 39(5):426–431. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3109916CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public Administration and PolicyRenmin University of ChinaBeijingChina