Introduction
Between 1990 and 2013, there were more than 25 attempts in the Chilean legislature to put an end to the electoral system regulating the election of parliamentarians that had been established by Pinochet’s authoritarian regime. Known as the binomial system, it had been criticized on various grounds (Chasquetti 2017). On the one hand, its legitimacy was questioned: because it was established by Pinochet, it was considered to be an “authoritarian legacy” (Garretón 2006). On the other hand, critics argued that the distribution of electoral districts led to pronounced inequalities in the vote (malapportionment), that it generated a marked disproportionality in representation, that it excluded important groups from the assembly, and that it did not encourage interparty competition (Auth 2006). Public opinion polls showed that a large part of the population supported electoral reform (Segovia and Laroze 2009). Nevertheless, no reform attempt prospered.
Following the 2013...
References
Auth P (2006) El sistema electoral chileno y los cambios necesarios. In: Huneeus C (ed) La Reforma al Sistema Binominal en Chile: Una Contribución al Debate. Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, Santiago
Bachelet M (2014) Mensaje de S.E. la Presidenta de la República con el que inicia un proyecto de ley que sustituye el sistema electoral binominal por un sistema electoral proporcional inclusivo y fortalece la representatividad del congreso nacional. http://www.camara.cl/pley/pley_detalle.aspx?prmID=9742&prmBL=9326-07. Accesed 3 May 2018
Carey J, Hix S (2011) The electoral sweet spot: low-magnitude proportional electoral systems. Am J Polit Sci 55:383–397
Chasquetti D (2017) Sobre las Reformas Políticas en Chile 2014–2016. In: Reformas Políticas en Chile 2014–2016. Ministerio Secretaría General de la Presidencia- IDEA, Santiago
Cox G (1990) Centripetal and centrifugal incentives in electoral systems. Am J Polit Sci 34:905–935
Dahlerup D (2007) Electoral gender quotas: between equality of opportunity and equality of result. Representation 43(2):73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00344890701363227
Gamboa R, Morales M (2016) Chile’s 2015 electoral reform: changing the rules of the game. Latin Am Polit Soc 58(4):126–144
Gamboa R, Morales M (2018a) Who pays the bill in the apparentments game? Lessons from the 2017 Chilean elections. Paper presented at the 76th MPSA meeting, Chicago
Gamboa R, Morales M (2018b) Gender quotas and campaign spending: woman representation in open-list proportional representation system. Unpublished Manuscript
Garretón M (2006) Sistema Electoral y Reforma Política. In: Huneeus C (ed) La Reforma al Sistema Binominal en Chile: Una Contribución al Debate. Konrad Adenauer, Santiago
Herron E, Pekkanen R, Shugart M (2018) Terminology and basic rules of electoral systems. In: Herron E, Pekkanen R, Shugart R (eds) The Oxford handbook of electoral systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Laakso M, Taagepera R (1979) Effective number of parties: a measure with application to west Europe. Comp Pol Stud 12(1):3–27
Lijphart A (1994) Electoral systems and party systems. A study of twenty-Seven democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Nohlen D (1995) Sistemas Electorales y Partidos Políticos. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México
Scully T (2017) A fourth critical juncture? Chilean politics after military rule. Qual Multi-Method Res 15(1): 21–26
Segovia C, Laroze D (2009) Demandas por Reformas al Régimen Electoral Chileno: La Visión desde la Opinión Pública. In: Fontaine A, Larroulet C, Navarrete J, Walker I (eds) Reforma del Sistema Electoral Chileno. PNUD, Santiago
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Gamboa, R., Dockendorff, A. (2019). Chilean Electoral System: A moderate D’Hondt PR. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3661-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3661-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences