Skip to main content

Platforms and Public Administration

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Crowdsourcing; e-Participation; Public participation; Two-sided markets

Definition

Platforms refer to the strategy to connect consumers (citizenships) and developers (government) interested in the outcomes of network interactions.

Introduction

In business administration, the strategic use of business management platforms is recurrent. Magazines are used to connect businesses – through their advertisers – with readers. Trade shows have established themselves around the globe through this same model, serving as the basis for the link between consumers and sellers. With the advancement of technology, companies like Facebook, Google, Alibaba, Uber, and Airbnb used the same format to become leaders in their business segments. The success of this format was then used in public administration, mainly to stimulate social participation and legitimization of governments.

In principle, the adoption of public service platforms has characteristics similar to those of the private market....

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Boudreau K, Lakhani K (2009) How to manage outside innovation. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 50(4):69

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2008) Crowdsourcing as a model for problem-solving: An introduction and cases. Convergence Int J Res New Media Technol 14(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2009) Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Plan Theory 8:242–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham DC (2013) Crowdsourcing. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown A, Fishenden J, Thompson M, Venters W (2017) Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Gov Inf Q 34(2):167–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenmann T, Parker G, Van Alstyne MW (2006) Strategies for two-sided markets. Harv Bus Rev 84:92

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans DS, Schmalensee R (2010) Failure to launch: Critical mass in platform businesses. Rev Netw Econ 9(4):1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagiu A, Rothman S (2016) Network effects aren’t enough. Harv Bus Rev 94:64–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgers D, Ihl C (2010) Citizensourcing: Applying the concept of open innovation to the public sector. Int J Public Part 4(1):67–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz ML, Shapiro C (1985) Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. Am Econ Rev 75:424–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler T (2015) Crowdsourcing-based business models: how to create and capture value. Calif Manag Rev 57:63–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Libert B, Wind Y, Fenley M (2014) What Airbnb, Uber, and Alibaba have in common. Harv Bus Rev 11:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Linders D (2012) From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Gov Inf Q 29:446–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nalbandian J, O’Neill R, Michael Wilkes J, Kaufman A (2013) Contemporary challenges in local government: Evolving roles and responsibilities, structures, and processes. Public Adm Rev 73(4):567–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nardi V, Zarpelon F, Verschoore J, de Araújo M (2018) The multiple bases of social return platforms: Evidence of a brazilian initiative. Int J Public Adm, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker GG, Van Alstyne MW, Choudary SP (2016) Platform revolution. W. W. Norton & Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth AE (2015) Who gets what – and why: The new economics of matchmaking and market design. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Royo S, Yetano A (2015) “Crowdsourcing” as a tool for e-participation: two experiences regarding CO2 emissions at municipal level. Electron Commer Res 15(3):323–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rysman M (2009) The economics of two-sided markets. J Econ Perspect 23:125–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seltzer E, Mahmoudi D (2013) Citizen participation, open innovation, and crowdsourcing: challenges and opportunities for planning. J Plan Lit 28:3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JC, Streib G (2005) E-democracy, E-commerce, and E-research: Examining the electronic ties between citizens and governments. Adm Soc 37(3):259–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Alstyne MW, Parker GG, Choudary SP (2016) Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harv Bus Rev 94(4):54–62

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vinicius Antonio Machado Nardi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Zarpelon, F., Nardi, V.A.M., Verschoore, J. (2018). Platforms and Public Administration. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3627-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3627-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics