Definitions
The interplay between judiciary and administration in Taiwan is deeply affected by its autocratic history, which makes the judicial-administrative relationship in Taiwan a different story from that in the States.
Introduction
The administrative development process in the United States is very different from that of most countries in the world. The US administration was developed through a “chinking in” process, which means it was developed incrementally as the need for administrative service in the society was created. Most countries in the world, such as those in Europe and Asia, developed their administrative system as empires. Taiwan, for example, inherited its administrative system from ancient China, whose legislative and judiciary power were both controlled by the administrative system. The system was maintained when Taiwan initiated a democratic transition in the...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Carpenter D (2001) The forging of bureaucratic autonomy. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Chen D-Y (2012) Democratic governance: an institutional reconciliation of public administration and democracy. Wunan, Taipei. (in Chinese)
Ginsburg T (2002) Confucian constitutionalism? The emergence of constitutional review in Korea and Taiwan. Law Soc Inq 27(4):763–799
Helco H (1975) OMB and the presidency – the problem of “Neutral competence”. Public Interest 38(Winter): 80–98
Lin Y-C (2009) The impossibility of legal constraint on bureaucratic discretion: a case study of supreme court rulings. (Master), National Chengchi University, Taipei. (in Chinese)
Luor C-J, Chang W-P (2008) Distributive behaviors of legislators in Taiwan: the influence of industry in electoral division and industrial background of legislators. Taiwan J Polit Sci 35:47–94. (in Chinese)
O’Leary R, Wise CR (1991) Public managers, judges, and legislators: redefining the “New partnership”. Public Adm Rev 51(4):316–327
Stillman RJ (1999) Preface to public administration: a search for themes and direction. Chatelaine Press, Burke
Tang C-P, Huang H-S (2008) Democratization and the independence of judiciary in Taiwan. Taiwan Polit Sci Rev 12(2):67–113. (in Chinese)
Waldo D (1948) The administrative state. The Ronald Press Company, New York
Wang C-S (2008) Judicial independence and democratic accountability. Taiwan Polit Sci Rev 12(2):115–164. (in Chinese)
Wang H-H (2017) Policy innovation and the role of the bureaucracy: an analysis of the governing disability of Taiwan after the end of martial law. J Civil Serv 9(3):27–64. (in Chinese)
Weber M (2009) The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press, New York
Weng Y-S (2004) Study of the effectiveness of interpretation of the grand council of justice. In: Wu G (ed) Public law and political theories. Angle.com. (in Chinese), Taipei, Taiwan
Yeh J-R, Chan g-C (2002) Transitional court and the rule of law: on judicial activism of the supreme administrative court in reviewing administrative rules. J Soc Sci Philos 14(4):515–559. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Lin, YC., Chen, DY. (2018). Interplay Between Judicial Review and Bureaucratic Discretion, Taiwan. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3600-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3600-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences