Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Federal Grand Jury System and Social Policy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

  • 65 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • 9–11.152, Requests by subjects and targets to testify before the grand jury, U.S. attorneys manual

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner S, Shaw L (2003) State grand juries. University of Dayton School of Law. Retrieved 8 Jan 2017

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell WJ (1973) Eliminate the grand jury. J Crim Law Criminol 64:174–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis v. United States, 384 US 855 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 US 211 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder Wood v. Georgia, 370 U.S. 375, 390 (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafetz FP, Pellettieri JM (1999) Time to reform the grand jury. National Bar Association, Washington, DC, p 12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurnard ND (1941) The jury of presentment and the Assize of Clarendon. Engl Hist Rev 56(223):374–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadish M (1996) Behind the locked door of an American grand jury: its history, its secrecy, and its process. Fla State Law Rev 24(1):5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney TJ (2014) Magna Carta and the right to trial by jury. Faculty Publications 1722. http://scholarship.law.wm.edu/facpubs/1722

  • Robin G (2010) The grand jury: historical roots, contemporary operation and calls for reform. Prof Issues Crim Just 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal B, Costilo B, Spivack G (1961) Obtaining a grand jury investigation in Pennsylvania. Temple Law Q 34:73–101

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S.C. § 3331(a)

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Const. Amend. V.8

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Mandujano, 425 U.S. 564, 581, 96 S. Ct. 1768, 1779, 48 L. Ed. 2d 212 (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Procter & Gamble Co., 356 US 677 (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Williams, 504 US 32 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Public Policy & Administration, Jackson State University, Jackson, MS, USA

    Randy L. T. Jacobs

Authors
  1. Randy L. T. Jacobs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Randy L. T. Jacobs .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Jacobs, R.L.T. (2017). Federal Grand Jury System and Social Policy. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3460-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3460-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation