Outlaw Citizenship

  • Amelia A. PridemoreEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3359-1


Definition of Outlaw Citizenship

Outlaw citizenship is when citizens eschew normative means of citizen participation, such as speaking at government meetings, for nontraditional and often confrontational activities such as protests and online organizing.


When citizens want their governments to hear them and they have a door literally or figuratively shut in their faces, many of them will resort to less traditional forms of citizen participation in the political process. This less-than-orthodox form of citizen participation that includes protests and online organizing is known as “outlaw citizenship” (as cited by King and Nank 2015).

Outlaw citizenship, as termed by American public administration scholars Cheryl S. King, at the Evergreen State College in Olympia, Washington, and Renee Nank, of the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (2015), happens when citizens eschew traditional means of citizen participation such...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adickes S (2002) Sisters, not demons: the influence of British suffragists on the American suffrage movement. Women’s Hist Rev 11(4):675–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akram S (2014) Recognizing the 2011 United Kingdom riots as political protest a theoretical framework based on agency, habitus and the preconscious. Br J Criminol 54(3):375–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andrews E (2016, August 25) The battle of Blair mountain. In History channel: history in the headlines. Retrieved from http://www.history.com/news/americas-largest-labor-uprising-the-battle-of-blair-mountain
  4. Crockett E (2017, March 7) The “Day without a woman” strike, explained. Vox. Retrieved from http://www.vox.com/identities/2017/3/3/14721468/international-womens-day-strike-a-day-without-a-woman-march-8
  5. Frederickson HG (1997) New public administration. University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, pp 13–47Google Scholar
  6. Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Adm Rev 66(S1):66–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fung A (2015) Putting the public back into governance: the challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Adm Rev 75(4):513–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. King CS, Nank R (2015) The context: citizens, administrators, and their discontents. In: King CS (ed) Government is us 2.0. Routledge, New York, pp 3–16Google Scholar
  9. Laurian L (2004) Public participation in environmental decision making: findings from communities facing toxic waste cleanup. J Am Plan Assoc 70(1):53–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Prose F (2017, January 30) Forget protest: Trump’s actions warrant a general national trike [Editorial]. Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/jan/30/travel-ban-airport-protests-disruption
  11. Rimmerman CA (2011) The new citizenship: unconventional politics, activism, and service, 4th edn. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  12. Simeonova E (2005) The Bulgarian crossroads: the political crisis. In: Engelbrekt K, Förberg M (eds) Managing political crises in Bulgaria: pragmatism and procrastination. CRISMART, Swedish National Defense College, Stockholm, pp 45–74Google Scholar
  13. Smith-Spark L (2017, January 17) Women’s March: protestors rally worldwide in solidarity. CNN. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/21/politics/trump-women-march-on-washington/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Florida International UniversityMiamiUSA