Skip to main content

Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Exercise of Discretion

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Agents; Front-line workers; Sense of judgment; Street-level officials

Definitions

Street-Level Bureaucrats

Street-level bureaucrats are “public service workers who interact directly with citizens in the course of their jobs, and who have substantial discreation in the execution of their work” (Lipsky 1980).

Discretion

Michael Lipsky (1980) and Tony Evans (2010) define discretion as the “extent of freedom a worker can exercise in a specific context and the factors that give rise to this freedom in that context.” Thus, the freedom or authority to make judgments and to act as one sees fit. Power to decide or act according to one’s own judgment.

Introduction

In his study “Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public services,” Michael Lipsky in the 1980s argued about the behavior of front-line workers in policy agencies; the scholar (Lipsky 1980) referred to these front-line staff as “street-level bureaucrats.” Street-level bureaucrats are considered pivotal...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beek J (2016) Producing stateness: police work in Ghana. Brill, Leiden

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bronitt SH, Stenning P (2011) Understanding discretion in modern policing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis KC (1969) Discretionary justice: a preliminary inquiry. LSU Press, Baton Rouge

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T (2010) Professional discretion in welfare services: beyond street-level bureaucracy, (Contemporary Social Work Series), Ashgate Publishing Ltd., Surrey, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans T (2016) Professional discretion in welfare services: beyond street-level bureaucracy. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MS (1989) Order without design: information production and policy making, vol 231. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleisher CS (1991) Using an agency-based approach to analyze collaborative federated interorganizational relationships. J Appl Behav Sci 27(1):116–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson E (2001) Professionalism: The third logic. London: Polity Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill M, Hupe P (2002) Implementing public policy: governance in theory and in practice. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber JD, Shipan CR (2002) Deliberate discretion?: The institutional foundations of bureaucratic autonomy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hupe P, Hill M (2007) Street-level bureaucracy and public accountability. Public Adm 85(2):279–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jay M (2005) Songs of experience: modern American and European variations on a universal theme. Univ of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keiser LR (2010) Understanding street-level Bureaucrats’ decision making: determining eligibility in the social security disability program. Public Adm rev 70(2):247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky M (1980) Street-level bureaucracy: dilemmas of the individual in public services. Russell Sage Foundation, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Matti S, Sandström A (2013) The defining elements of advocacy coalitions: continuing the search for explanations for coordination and coalition structures. Rev Policy Res 30(2):240–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers MK, Vorsanger S (2007) Street-level bureaucrats and the implementation of public policy. In: Guy Peters B, Pierre J (eds) The handbook of public administration. Sage, London, pp 153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandfort JR (2000) Moving beyond discretion and outcomes: Examining public management from the front lines of the welfare system. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10(4):729–756

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekwat A (2000) Principal-agent theory: a framework for improving health care reform in Tennessee. J Health Hum Serv Adm:277–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Sevä M (2015) The decisive role of street-level bureaucrats in environmental management. Doctoral dissertation, Luleå tekniska universitet

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman LW (1984) Experiments in police discretion: scientific boon or dangerous knowledge? Law Contemp Probl 47(4):61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers L, Bekkers V (2014) Policy implementation, street-level bureaucracy, and the importance of discretion. Public Manag Rev 16(4):527–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tummers L, Bekkers V, Steijn B (2009) Policy alienation of public professionals: application in a new public management context. Public ManagRev 11(5):685–706

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franklin Akosa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Akosa, F., Asare, B.E. (2017). Street-Level Bureaucrats and the Exercise of Discretion. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3353-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3353-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics