Definition
Characteristics and current situation of performance management among Japanese local government.
Introduction
Measuring performance of organization for better public service delivery is an essential part of recent public sector reforms in many countries (Bouckaert and Halligan 2008; Boyne 2010). It is widely recognized that a “performance management” in public sector reform is an application of new public management (NPM) disciplines that seek economy and efficiency of public organizations through a competitive market for “public choice.” A movement for performance management started in the US local governments in the late 1980s and spilled over to non-Western countries including Asian developing nations (Koike 2013). In Japan, in the rise of “bureaucracy bashing” in the early 1990s, public managers were forced to be more accountable...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Agranoff R, McGuire M (2003) Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Bouckaert G, Halligan J (2008) Managing performance: international comparisons. Routledge, London
Boyne G (2010) Performance management: does it work? In: Walker RM, Boyne GA, Brewer GA (eds) Public management and performance: research directions. Cambridge University Press, New York
Christensen T, Lægreid P (2007) The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Adm Rev 67(6):1059–1066
DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48(2):147–160
Gulick L (1937) Science, values and public administration. In: Gulick LH, Urwick L (eds) Papers on the science of administration. Institute of Public Administration, New York
Jun JS, Koike O (1998) Why is total quality management not popular in Japanese public administration? Int Rev Adm Sci 64:275–288
Koike O (2013) Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: looking east or west? Int J Public Sector Manage 26(5):347–360
Koike O, Hori M, Kabashima H (2007) The Japanese government reform of 2000 and the self-evaluation system: efforts, results and limitations. Ritsumeikan Law Rev 24:1–11
Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (2014) Survey results on the current status of administrative evaluation in local government (in Japanese)
Moynihan DP (2005) Goal-based learning and the future of performance management. Public Adm Rev 65(2):203–216
Swiss JE (2005) A framework for assessing incentives in results-based management. Public Adm Rev 65(5):592–602
Tanaka H (2009) Evaluation in local government in Japan. Council of Local Authorities for International Relations (CLAIR), Tokyo
Umeda J (2000) Experiences in the introduction of policy evaluation: systematic resistance within the MIE prefectural government to the introduction of the project performance evaluation. Nihon Kokyo Seisaku Gakkai Nenpo (in Japanese)
Wildavsky A (1972) The self-evaluating organization. Public Adm Rev 32(5):509–520
Yokohama City Government (2016) Yokohama City midterm 4-year plan 2014–2017: an interim assessment (in Japanese)
Yokoyama M (2009) Evaluation systems in local government: are evaluation systems useful tools of administrative reform? Interdiscip Inf Sci 15(2):243–250
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this entry
Cite this entry
Koike, O. (2018). Performance Management in Japanese Local Government. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3248-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3248-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences