Transparency Measures in an International Context

  • Luke Justin HeemsbergenEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3049-1

Definition

Contextually accurate modes of assessing the openness, accessibility, and value of government and third-party disclosures which can shape political, economic, and social realities.

Introduction

While transparency continues to be, prima facie, tied to good governance, accountability, and democratic process itself, current debates have shifted to efficacy and questioning the political assumptions baked into what transparency is and how it is accomplished in specific contexts. That is to say that specific forms that transparency takes in governance vary considerably in both normative and methodological planes depending on the context. Contextually accurate modes of assessing the openness, accessibility, and value of government and third-party public disclosures, which can shape political, economic, and social realities, are at the core of international measures of transparency. However, the unique forms of transparency and how to measure them remain a complex question and one...

Keywords

Good Governance International Context Public Disclosure Credit Rating Agency Accurate Mode 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Attard J, Orlandi F, Scerri S, Auer S (2015) A systematic review of open government data initiatives. Gov Inf Q 32(4):399–418CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berners-Lee T (2006) Design issues: linked data. Retrieved from https://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html
  3. Bovens M (2010) Two concepts of accountability: accountability as a virtue and as a mechanism. West Eur Polit 33(5):946–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eijffinger SC, Geraats PM (2006) How transparent are central banks? Eur J Polit Econ 22(1):1–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erkilla T (2012) Government transparency: impact and unintended consequences. Palgrave Macmillan, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Heald D (2006) Varieties of transparency. In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance? Proceedings of the British Academy (135). Oxford University Press for The British Academy, Oxford, pp 25–43Google Scholar
  7. Meijer A, ‘t Hart P, Worthy B (2015) Assessing government transparency: an interpretive framework. Adm Soc. doi:10.1177/0095399715598341Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Political Sciences, Melbourne School of GovernmentThe University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia