Skip to main content

Higher Education Governance and Reforms

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

Synonyms

Tertiary Education Management and Policy Changes

Introduction

In many countries, higher education systems have gone through a significant and rapid transition from being elite to being mass or universal in a relatively short period of time. “Elite” higher education can be understood as a historical approach to providing higher education to only a privileged few that preceded the transition to higher education for all (Trow 1974). It was characterized by limited and selective access based on birth, talent, or both of these; highly structured curricula; uninterrupted, full-time studies directly after secondary education; a small number of homogenous universities; institutional governance of small elite groups who shared basic values and assumptions in decision-making; and broadly shared and relatively high academic standards. In contrast, modern mass higher education is characterized by larger access with meritocratic criteria, flexible curricula, direct or delayed entry after...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ben-David J (1977) Centers of learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum: Birnbaum, R. (1988) How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum R (2001) Management Fads in higher education. Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Brante T (2010) State formation and the historical take-off of continental professional types: the case of Sweden. In: Svensson L, Evetts J (eds) Sociology of professions: continental and anglo-saxon traditions. Gotherburg, Daidalos

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun D, Merrien FX (1999) Governance of universities and modernisation of the state: Analytical aspects. In: Braun D, Merrien FX (eds) Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view, Higher education policy series, 53. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London/Philadelphia, pp 9–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L (2014) Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Adm Rev 74(4):445–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrows J (1999) Going beyond labels: a framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Edu 70(4):5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark BR (1983) The higher education system. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark BR (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. IAU Press/Pergamon, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbett A (2011) Ping pong: competing leadership for reform in EU higher education 1998–2006. Eur J Educ 46(1):36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot P (1972) The sociology of the professions. Herder & Herder, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni A (ed) (1969) The semi-professions and their organizations: teachers, nurses and social workers. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1998) The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university-industry government relations. Minerva 36:203–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farnham D (1999) Managing universities and regulating academic labour markets. In: Farnham D (ed) Managing academic staff in changing university systems, international trends and comparisons. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 4–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith JR (1971) Matrix organization designs: how to combine functional and project forms. Bus Horiz 14(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Greve C (2015) Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s: digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Org Rev 15(1):49–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel M (2000) Academic identities and policy change in higher education. Jessica Kingsley, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölttä S (1995) Towards the self-regulative university. University of Joensuu, Joensuu

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed B (2004) Funding higher education: options, trade-offs and dilemmas. Paper for Fulbright Brainstorms 2004: New Trends in Higher Education, 24–25 Sept 2004, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed B, Enders J, Salerno C (2008) Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Educ 56:303–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallo J (2009) OECD education policy. A comparative study focusing on the thematic reviews of tertiary education. Finnish Educational Research Association, Jyväskylä

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr C (1963) The uses of the university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivistö J (2007) Agency theory as a framework for the government-university relationship. Tampere University Press, Tampere

    Google Scholar 

  • Kivistö J, Tirronen J (2012) New elitism in universal higher education: the building process, policy and the idea of Aalto University. In: Ahola S, Hoffman D (eds) Higher education research in Finland. Finnish Institute for Educational Research, Jyväskylä, pp 69–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Kraft M, Furlong S (2006) Public policy: politics, analysis, and alternatives. CQ Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall BÅ (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg H (1983) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore M (1995) Creating public value. Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Neave G, van Vught FA (1991) Conclusion. In: Neave G, van Vught FA (eds) Prometheus bound. The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 239–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2004) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Power M (1999) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Readings B (1996) The university in ruins. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson Paul A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4): 387–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santiago P, Tremblay K, Basri E, Arnal E (2008) Tertiary education for the knowledge society. Special features: governance, funding and quality, vol 1. OECD, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayles LR (1976) Matrix organization: the structure with a future. Organ Dyn 5(2):2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Administrative behavior. A study of decision-making process in administrative organization, 2nd edn. The Macmillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter S, Leslie L (1998) Academic capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Teichler U (2000) The Relationships between higher education research and higher education policy and practice: the researchers perspective. In: Teichler U, Sadlak J (eds) Higher education research: its relationship to policy and practice. Pergamon and IAU Press, Oxford, pp 3–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow M (1974) Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In: Policies for higher education, from the general report on the conference on future structures of post-secondary education. OECD, Paris, pp 55–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow M (2006) Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access in modern societies since WWII. In: Forest JJF, Altbach PG (eds) International handbook of higher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 243–280

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vedung E (1998) Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc ML, Rist RC, Vedung E (eds) Carrots, sticks, and sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 21–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Adm Sci Q 21(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. The Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ziman J (1996) “Postacademic Science”: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Sci Stud 9(1):67–80

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elias Pekkola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J. (2016). Higher Education Governance and Reforms. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3019-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3019-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics