Introduction
In many countries, higher education systems have gone through a significant and rapid transition from being elite to being mass or universal in a relatively short period of time. “Elite” higher education can be understood as a historical approach to providing higher education to only a privileged few that preceded the transition to higher education for all (Trow 1974). It was characterized by limited and selective access based on birth, talent, or both of these; highly structured curricula; uninterrupted, full-time studies directly after secondary education; a small number of homogenous universities; institutional governance of small elite groups who shared basic values and assumptions in decision-making; and broadly shared and relatively high academic standards. In contrast, modern mass higher education is characterized by larger access with meritocratic criteria, flexible curricula, direct or delayed entry after...
References
Ben-David J (1977) Centers of learning: Britain, France, Germany, United States. McGraw-Hill, New York
Birnbaum: Birnbaum, R. (1988) How colleges work: The cybernetics of academic organization and leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
Birnbaum R (2001) Management Fads in higher education. Where they come from, what they do, why they fail. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco
Brante T (2010) State formation and the historical take-off of continental professional types: the case of Sweden. In: Svensson L, Evetts J (eds) Sociology of professions: continental and anglo-saxon traditions. Gotherburg, Daidalos
Braun D, Merrien FX (1999) Governance of universities and modernisation of the state: Analytical aspects. In: Braun D, Merrien FX (eds) Towards a new model of governance for universities? A comparative view, Higher education policy series, 53. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London/Philadelphia, pp 9–33
Bryson JM, Crosby BC, Bloomberg L (2014) Public value governance: moving beyond traditional public administration and the new public management. Public Adm Rev 74(4):445–456
Burrows J (1999) Going beyond labels: a framework for profiling institutional stakeholders. Contemporary Edu 70(4):5–10
Clark BR (1983) The higher education system. University of California Press, Berkeley
Clark BR (1998) Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. IAU Press/Pergamon, Oxford
Corbett A (2011) Ping pong: competing leadership for reform in EU higher education 1998–2006. Eur J Educ 46(1):36–53
Elliot P (1972) The sociology of the professions. Herder & Herder, New York
Etzioni A (ed) (1969) The semi-professions and their organizations: teachers, nurses and social workers. Free Press, New York
Etzkowitz H, Leydesdorff L (1998) The endless transition: a “triple helix” of university-industry government relations. Minerva 36:203–208
Farnham D (1999) Managing universities and regulating academic labour markets. In: Farnham D (ed) Managing academic staff in changing university systems, international trends and comparisons. The Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press, Buckingham, pp 4–31
Galbraith JR (1971) Matrix organization designs: how to combine functional and project forms. Bus Horiz 14(1):29–40
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage, London
Greve C (2015) Ideas in public management reform for the 2010s: digitalization, value creation and involvement. Public Org Rev 15(1):49–65
Henkel M (2000) Academic identities and policy change in higher education. Jessica Kingsley, London
Hölttä S (1995) Towards the self-regulative university. University of Joensuu, Joensuu
Jongbloed B (2004) Funding higher education: options, trade-offs and dilemmas. Paper for Fulbright Brainstorms 2004: New Trends in Higher Education, 24–25 Sept 2004, Lisbon
Jongbloed B, Enders J, Salerno C (2008) Higher education and its communities: interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Educ 56:303–324
Kallo J (2009) OECD education policy. A comparative study focusing on the thematic reviews of tertiary education. Finnish Educational Research Association, Jyväskylä
Kerr C (1963) The uses of the university. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Kivistö J (2007) Agency theory as a framework for the government-university relationship. Tampere University Press, Tampere
Kivistö J, Tirronen J (2012) New elitism in universal higher education: the building process, policy and the idea of Aalto University. In: Ahola S, Hoffman D (eds) Higher education research in Finland. Finnish Institute for Educational Research, Jyväskylä, pp 69–88
Kraft M, Furlong S (2006) Public policy: politics, analysis, and alternatives. CQ Press, Washington, DC
Lundvall BÅ (ed) (1992) National systems of innovation: towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. Pinter Publishers, London
Mintzberg H (1983) Structure in fives: designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Moore M (1995) Creating public value. Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press, Boston
Neave G, van Vught FA (1991) Conclusion. In: Neave G, van Vught FA (eds) Prometheus bound. The changing relationship between government and higher education in Western Europe. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 239–255
Pollitt C, Bouckaert G (2004) Public management reform: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Power M (1999) The audit society: rituals of verification. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Readings B (1996) The university in ruins. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Samuelson Paul A. (1954). The pure theory of public expenditure. Review of Economics and Statistics 36(4): 387–389.
Santiago P, Tremblay K, Basri E, Arnal E (2008) Tertiary education for the knowledge society. Special features: governance, funding and quality, vol 1. OECD, Paris
Sayles LR (1976) Matrix organization: the structure with a future. Organ Dyn 5(2):2–17
Simon HA (1957) Administrative behavior. A study of decision-making process in administrative organization, 2nd edn. The Macmillan Company, New York
Slaughter S, Leslie L (1998) Academic capitalism: politics, policies and the entrepreneurial university. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Teichler U (2000) The Relationships between higher education research and higher education policy and practice: the researchers perspective. In: Teichler U, Sadlak J (eds) Higher education research: its relationship to policy and practice. Pergamon and IAU Press, Oxford, pp 3–34
Trow M (1974) Problems in the transition from elite to mass higher education. In: Policies for higher education, from the general report on the conference on future structures of post-secondary education. OECD, Paris, pp 55–101
Trow M (2006) Reflections on the transition from elite to mass to universal access in modern societies since WWII. In: Forest JJF, Altbach PG (eds) International handbook of higher education. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 243–280
Vedung E (1998) Policy instruments: typologies and theories. In: Bemelmans-Videc ML, Rist RC, Vedung E (eds) Carrots, sticks, and sermons: policy instruments and their evaluation. Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, pp 21–58
Weick KE (1976) Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Adm Sci Q 21(1):1–19
Williamson OE (1975) Markets and hierarchies: analysis and antitrust implications. A study in the economics of internal organization. The Free Press, New York
Ziman J (1994) Prometheus bound: science in a dynamic steady state. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ziman J (1996) “Postacademic Science”: constructing knowledge with networks and norms. Sci Stud 9(1):67–80
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Pekkola, E., Kivistö, J. (2016). Higher Education Governance and Reforms. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3019-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_3019-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences