Performance Management in Social Service Provision

  • X. L. WangEmail author
  • S. T. KongEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2995-1

Synonyms

Introduction

A global movement of new public management which emerged in the 1980s is characterized by outsourcing the production of public goods and services to private organizations (Denhardt and Denhardt 2000; Haque 2007). Privatization advocates argue that governments will receive better services at lower costs because of the expertise and innovation of private service operators (Van Slyke 2007). Under the influence of new public management and neoliberalism, there is a convergence toward outsourcing social service production to third sector organizations such as nonprofit organizations and social enterprises. For example, in the UK, The Public Services (Social Value) Act 2012 calls for all public sector commissioning to factor in social value and was designed to open up more opportunities for social enterprises to win bids for the delivery of public services.

Previous research on...

Keywords

Social Service Service User Performance Management Social Enterprise Social Entrepreneur 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Beresford P (2000) Service users’ knowledges and social work theory: conflict or collaboration? Br J Soc Work 30(4):489–503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beresford P, Cross S (2011) Involvement and empowerment at the end of life: overcoming the barriers. In: Conway S (ed) Governing death and loss: empowerment, involvement and participation. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 53–62Google Scholar
  3. Brown TL, Potoski M (2003) Transaction costs and institutional explanations for government service production decisions. J Public Adm Res Theory 13(4):441–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown TL, Potoski M, Van Slyke D (2015) Managing complex contracts: a theoretical approach. J Public Adm Res Theory 26:294–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carson SJ, Madhok A, Wu T (2006) Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: the effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Acad Manag J 49(5):1058–1077CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Croft S, Beresford P (1996) The politics of participation. In: Taylor D (ed) Critical social policy: a reader. Sage Publications, London, pp 175–198Google Scholar
  7. Cousins JB, Chouinard JA (2012) Participatory evaluation up close: an integration of research-based knowledge. IAP, CharlotteGoogle Scholar
  8. Denhardt RB, Denhardt JV (2000) The new public service: serving rather than steering. Public Adm Rev 60(6):549–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2012) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 22(1):1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Frost N (2009) Evaluating practice. In: Adams R, Dominelli L, Payne M (eds) Practising social work in a complex world. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 296–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geyskens I, Steenkamp JBE, Kumar N (2006) Make, buy, or ally: a transaction cost theory meta-analysis. Acad Manag J 49(3):519–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Girth AM, Hefetz A, Johnston JM, Warner ME (2012) Outsourcing public service delivery: management responses in noncompetitive markets. Public Adm Rev 72(6):887–900CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gormley WT, Weimer DL (1999) Organizational report cards. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  14. Gray M, Plath D, Webb SA, Webb S (2009) Evidence-based social work: a critical stance. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Guba EG, Lincoln YS (1989) Fourth generation evaluation. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  16. Haque MS (2007) Revisiting the new public management. Public Adm Rev 67(1):179–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hefetz A, Warner ME (2011) Contracting or public delivery? The importance of service, market and management characteristics. J Public Adm Res Theory 22(2):289–317CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Henry GT, Smith AA, Kershaw DC, Zulli RA (2013) Formative evaluation estimating preliminary outcomes and testing rival explanations. Am J Eval 34(4):465–485CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heron J, Reason P (1997) A participatory inquiry paradigm. Qual Inq 3:274–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schatzki T (1996) Social practices: a Wittgensteinian approach to human activity and the social. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Smith D (2004) Introduction: some versions of evidence-based practice. In: Smith D (ed) Social work and evidence-based practice. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London, pp 7–28Google Scholar
  22. Van Slyke DM (2007) Agents or stewards: using theory to understand the government-nonprofit social service contracting relationship. J Public Adm Res Theory 17(2):157–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Williamson OE (1981) The economics of organization: the transaction cost approach. Am J Sociol 87:548–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism: firms, markets, and relational contracting. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Applied Social SciencesThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHong KongChina
  2. 2.Centre for Civil Society and GovernanceUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong
  3. 3.Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong