Skip to main content

Introduction

One dominant framework sets the terms for almost all thinking today about questions of sustainability. Whether contemporary policy-makers are aware of it or not, this structure is the basis of the way that most practitioners and thinkers across the globe approach sustainability issues. The framework assumes that sustainability should be understood in terms of three domains: the economy, the environment, and the social. These domains are said to relate to each other as three independent spheres of life. They are usually depicted visually as three pillars, as a Venn diagram of three intersecting circles, or as three nested concentric circles with the economy at the center. In each case their combined outcome is one of supposed sustainability.

Today, sustainability is a foundational concept for public administration, policy-making and political governance, and versions of this three-domain framework are everywhere in policy documents. Despite this prevalence, however, the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AIGA, the Professional Association for Design, website (2016) www.aiga.org/the-living-principles-for-design/. Last accessed 16 Oct 2016

  • Banon Gomis LJ, Parra G, Hoffman WM, McNulty RE (2011) Rethinking the concept of sustainability. Bus Soc Rev 116(2):171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson R (1962) Silent spring. Mariner, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Castanheira G, Braganca L (2014) The evolution of the sustainability assessment tool: from buildings to the built environment. Sci World J 2014, 10 pp. doi:10.1155/2014/491791

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff P (1996) Ecological modernisation, ecological modernities. Environ Pollut 3(3):476–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Comte A (1875) System of positive polity: vol. 2. Longmans, Green and Company, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Constanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al (1987) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and capital. Nature 387(15):253–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Deegan C (2013) The accountant will have a central role in saving the planet ... really? A reflection on “Green Accounting and Green Eyeshades Twenty Years Later”. Crit Perspect Account 24(6):448–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with Forks: the triple bottom line of twenty-first century business. Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault M (2008) The birth of biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978–1979. Palgrave McMillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Hawkes J (2001) The fourth pillar of sustainability: culture’s essential role in public planning. Cultural Development Network, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson J (1902) Imperialism: a study. George Allen and Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • James, P., with Magee, L., Scerri, A., and Steger, M. (2015), Urban sustainability in theory and practice: circles of sustainability, Routledge, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamberton G (2005) Sustainability accounting: a brief history and conceptual framework. Account Forum 29:7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magee L (2016) Interwoven cities. Palgrave McMillan, Basningstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marx K (1867) Capital: volume 1. Dover Publications, Mineola

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth: a report for the Club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. Universe Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Scerri A (2012) Ends in view: the capabilities approach in ecological/sustainability economics. Ecol Econ 77:7–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith A (1776) Wealth of nations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2000) Millennium declaration. United Nations General Assembly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2001) Road map towards the implementation of the United Nations millennium declaration: report of the secretary-general. United Nations General Assembly, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Conference on Housing and Sustainable Urban Development (UN-Habitat) (2016) Draft outcome document of the United Nations conference on housing and sustainable urban development. UN-Habitat, Quito

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber H (2015) Reproducing inequalities through development: the MDGs and the politics of method. Globalizations 12(4):660–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werbach A (2009) Strategy for sustainability: a business manifesto. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1997) Our common future. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • www.circlesofsustainability.org. Last accessed 10 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • www.globalreporting.org/standards. Last accessed 10 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • www.greenbiz.com/blog/2013/05/22/has-gri-consigned-itself-irrelevance. Last accessed 10 Nov 2016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul James .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

James, P., Magee, L. (2016). Domains of Sustainability. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2760-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics