Value Measurement

  • David J. CiukEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2550-1

A value, according to traditional psychological theory, is an enduring belief that a specific mode of conduct or end state of existence is personally or socially preferable to an opposite mode of conduct or end state of existence (Rokeach 1973). Values, however, rarely act in isolation; rather, they work in a “comparative and competitive” fashion. Therefore, it is useful to think in terms of value systems, which are defined as enduring organizations of beliefs concerning preferable modes of conduct or end states of existence along a continuum of relative importance (Rokeach 1973). According to Schwartz (1992), values (1) are beliefs (2) that refer to desirable goals. They (3) transcend specific situations, (4) are ordered by relative importance, and (5) serve as standards or criteria. Finally, (6) it is the relative importance of the set of relevant values that guides action.

Values play an important role in research across a wide array of social science disciplines. In political...

Keywords

Rating Instrument Transitive Preference Portrait Value Questionnaire Schwartz Value Survey Competitive Aspect 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Abramson PR, Inglehart R (1995) Value change in a global perspective. University of Michigan Press, Ann ArborCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez RM, Brehm J (1995) American ambivalence towards abortion policies: development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. Am J Polit Sci 39:1055–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bernard MM, Maio GR, Olson JM (2003) Effects of introspection about reasons for values: extending research on values-as-truisms. Soc Cogn 21:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borg I, Groenen P (2005) Modern multidimensional scaling: theory and applications, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Braithwaite VA, Law HG (1985) Structure of human values: testing the adequacy of the Rokeach Values Survey. J Pers Soc Psychol 49:250–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ciuk DJ (2016) Americans’ value preferences pre- and post-9/11. Soc Sci Q 97:407–417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ciuk DJ, Jacoby WG (2015) Checking for systematic value preferences using the method of triads. Polit Psychol 36:709–728CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis DW (2007) Negative liberty: public opinion and the terrorist attacks on America. Sage, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Davis DW, Davenport C (1999) Assessing the validity of the postmaterialism index. Am Polit Sci Rev 93:649–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis DW, Silver BD (2004) Civil liberties vs. security: public opinion in the context of the terrorist attacks on America. Am J Polit Sci 48:28–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Feldman S (1988) Structure and consistency in public opinion: the role of core beliefs and values. Am J Polit Sci 32:416–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldman S (2003) Values, ideology, and the structure of political attitudes. In: Sears DO, Huddy L, Jervis R (eds) Oxford handbook of political psychology. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 477–508Google Scholar
  13. Feldman S, Zaller J (1992) The political culture of ambivalence: ideological responses to the welfare state. Am J Polit Sci 36:268–307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gardikoitis A, Baltzis A (2012) Rock music for myself and justice to the world!: musical identity, values, and music preferences. Psychol Music 40:143–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goren P (2005) Party identification and core political values. Am J Polit Sci 49:881–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goren P, Federico CM, Kittilson MC (2009) Source cues, partisan identities, and political value expression. Am J Polit Sci 53:805–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grant TJ, Rudolph TJ (2003) Value conflict, group affect, and the issue of campaign finance. Am J Polit Sci 47:453–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hitlin S, Piliavin JA (2004) Values: reviving a dormant concept. Annu Rev Sociol 30:359–393CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hofstede G (2001) Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  20. Inglehart R (1977) The silent revolution: changing values and political styles among western publics. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  21. Inglehart R, Abramson PR (1999) Measuring postmaterialism. Am Polit Sci Rev 93:665–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jackson DJ, Alwin DF (1980) The factor analysis of ipsative measures. Sociol Methods Res 9:218–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jacoby WG (2006) Value choices and American public opinion. Am J Polit Sci 50:706–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacoby WG (2011) Measuring value choices: are rank orders valid indicators? Annual Meetings of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago Presented at the Annual Meetings of the Southern Political Science AssociationGoogle Scholar
  25. Jacoby WG (2014) Is there a culture war? conflicting value structures in American public opinion. Am Polit Sci Rev 108:754–771CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kohn ML (1977) Class and conformity: a study in values, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Krosnick JA, Alwin DF (1988) A test of the form-resistant correlation hypothesis: ratings, rankings, and the measurement of values. Public Opin Q 52:526–538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lee MJ, Hatzigeorgiadis A, Whitehead J, Ntoumanis N (2008) Relationships among values, achievement orientations, and attitudes in youth sport. J Sport Exercise Psychol 30:588–610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maio GR, Olson JM (1998) Values as truisms: evidence and implications. J Pers Soc Psychol 74:294–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maio GR, Roese NJ, Seligman C, Katz A (1996) Rankings, ratings, and the measurement of values: evidence for the superior validity of ratings. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 18:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McCann JA (1997) Electoral choices and core value change: the 1992 presidential campaign. Am J Polit Sci 41:564–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McCarty JA, Shrum LJ (2000) The measurement of personal values in survey research: a test of alternative rating procedures. Public Opin Q 64:271–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. McClosky H, Zaller J (1984) The American ethos: public attitudes toward capitalism and democracy. Harvard University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Miethe TD (1985) The validity and reliability of value measurements. J Psychol 115:441–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oyserman D, Coon HM, Kemmelmeier M (2002) Rethinking individualism and collectivism: evaluation of theoretical assumptions and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull 128:3–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pepper M, Jackson T, Uzzell D (2009) An examination of the values that motivate socially conscious and frugal consumer behaviours. Int J Consum Stud 33:126–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Piurko Y, Schwartz SH, Davidov E (2011) Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Polit Psychol 32:537–561CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rokeach M (1968) Beliefs, attitudes, and values: a theory of organization and change. Jossey–Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  39. Rokeach M (1973) The nature of human values. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Sagiv L (2002) Vocational interests and basic values. J Career Assess 10:233–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schwartz SH (1992) Universals in the content and structure of values. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. Academic Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Schwartz SH (1994) Are there universal aspects in the structure and content of human values? J Soc Issues 50:19–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schwartz SH (2007) Value orientations: measurement, antecedents, and consequences across nations. In: Jowell R, Roberts C, Fitzgerald R, Eva G (eds) Measuring attitudes cross-nationally: lessons from the European social survey. Sage, Los AngelesGoogle Scholar
  44. Schwartz SH, Caprara GV, Vecchione M (2010) Basic personal values, core political values, and voting: a longitudinal analysis. Polit Psychol 31:421–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stoutenborough JW, Bromley-Trujillo R, Vedlitz A (2014) Public support for climate change policy: consistency in the influence of values and attitudes over time and across specific policy alternatives. Rev Policy Res 31:555–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of GovernmentFranklin & Marshall CollegeLancasterUSA