Skip to main content
  • 140 Accesses

Synonyms

Civic engagement; Comanagement; Cooperation; Public participation; Stakeholder partnership

Introduction

For many, the word “collaboration” probably conjures some image of multiple parties working together to achieve some mutually desired end, a shared effort to achieve a goal in which each party has a shared stake. Indeed, this is largely consistent with what we talk about when we discuss collaboration in the context of public administration and public policy. Very broadly speaking, in public management, policymaking, and governance, collaboration is often used as a tool for organizing the efforts of multiple groups or individuals working together in a manner that is typically cooperative and deliberative, as opposed to adversarial and hierarchical. Choosing the exact terminology here can be problematic because there are so many different terms that have been used in the literature to describe collaboration in the context of governing. Common terms represented in the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agranoff R, McGuire M (2003) Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell C, Gash A (2008) Collaborative governance in theory and practice. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:543–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS (2000) Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson K, Nabatchi T, O’Leary R, Stephens J (2003) The challenges of environmental conflict resolution. In: O’Leary R, Bingham LB (eds) The promist and performance of environmental conflict resolution. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Emerson K, Nabatchi T, Balogh S (2011) An integrative framework for collaborative governance. J Public Adm Res Theory 22(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin JS (1991) Democracy and deliberation: new directionsn for democratic reform. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila T, Gerlak AK (2005) The formation of large-scale collaborative resource management institutions: clarifying the roles of stakeholders, science, and institutions. Policy Stud J 33(4):583–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Layzer JA (2012) Open for business: conservatives’ opposition to environmental regulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach WD, Sabatier PA (2005) To trust an adversary: integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. Am Polit Sci Rev 99(4):491–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach WD, Pelkey NW, Sabatier PA (2002) Stakeholder partnerships as collaborative policymaking: evaluation criteria applied to watershed management in California and Washington. J Policy Anal Manage 21(4):645–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M (2004) Collaborative watershed management: a view from the grassroots. Policy Stud J 32(3):341–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholson-Crotty S, O’Toole L (2004) Public management and organizational performance: the case of law enforcement agencies. J Public Adm Res Theory 14:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ophuls W (1977) Ecology and the politics of scarcity: prologue to a political theory of the steady state. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (2007) Institutional rational choice: an assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In: Sabatier PA (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Provan KG, Brinton Milward H (1995) A preliminary theory of interorganizational effectiveness: a comparative study of four community mental health systems. Adm Sci Q 40:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4:155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatier PA, Jenkins-Smith HC (eds) (1993) Policy change and learning: an advocacy coalition approach. Westview Press, Boulder

    Google Scholar 

  • Sabel C, Fung A, Karkkainen B (1999) Beyond backyard environmentalism: how communities are quietly refashioning environmental regulation. Boston Rev

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas CW (2003) Bureaucratic landscapes: interagency cooperation and the preservation of biodiversity. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JQ (1991) Bureaucracy: what government agencies do and why they do It. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Shreck .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Shreck, B. (2016). Politics and Collaboration. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2521-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2521-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics