Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Justice

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Book cover Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams J (1963) Toward an understanding of inequity. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 67:422–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams J (1965) Inequity in social exchange. In: Berkowitz L (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 267–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose M, Arnaud A (2005) Distributive and procedural justice: construct distinctiveness, construct interdependence, and overall justice. In: Greenberg J, Colquitt J (eds) The handbook of organizational justice. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 59–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ambrose M, Wo D, Griffith M (2015) Overall justice: past, present, and future. In: Ambrose M, Cropanzano R (eds) Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 109–135, ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. 22 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies R (2015) Interactional justice: looking backward, looking forward. In: Ambrose M, Cropanzano R (eds) Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 89–107, ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. 22 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies R, Moag J (1986) Interactional justice: communication criteria of fairness. In: Lewicki RJ, Sheppard BH, Bazerman MH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 43–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies R, Tripp TM (1996) Beyond distrust: “getting even” and the need for revenge. In: Kramer RM, Tyler T (eds) Trust in organizations. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 246–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Blader S, Tyler T (2015) Relational models of procedural justice. In: Ambrose M, Cropanzano R (eds) Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 351–369, ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. 22 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau P (1964) Exchange and power in social life. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner J, Wiesenfeld B (1996) An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: interactive effects of outcomes and procedures. Psychol Bull 120:189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ, Porter C, Ng K (2001) Justice at the millennium: a meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. J Appl Psychol 86:425–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt J, Greenberg J, Zapata-Phelan C (2005) What is organizational justice? A historical overview. In: Greenberg J, Colquitt J (eds) Handbook of organizational justice. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, pp 3–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt JA, Scott BA, Rodell JB, Long DM, Zapata CP, Conlon DE, Wesson MJ (2013) Justice at the millennium, a decade later: a meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. J Appl Psychol 98:199–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Prehar C, Chen P (2002) Using social exchange theory to distinguish procedural from interactional justice. Group Org Manag 27:324–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzano R, Bowen D, Gilliland S (2007) The management of organizational justice. Acad Manag Perspect 21:34–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch M (1975) Equity, equality, and need: what determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? J Soc Issues 31:137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easton D (1965) A systems analysis of political life. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger R (1986) Rethinking equity theory: a referent cognitions model. In: Bierhoff HW, Cohen RL, Greenberg J (eds) Research in social relations. Plenum Press, New York, pp 145–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger R (1993) Reactions to mistreatment at work. In: Murnighan K (ed) Social psychology in organizations: advances in theory and research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 161–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg J (1993) The social side of fairness: interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In: Cropanzano R (ed) Justice in the workplace: approaching fairness in human resource management. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 79–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans G (1958) Social behavior as exchange. Am J Sociol 63:597–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones D, Skarlicki D (2005) The effects of overhearing peers discuss an authority’s fairness reputation on reactions to subsequent treatment. J Appl Psychol 90(2):363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laschinger H (2004) Hospital nurses’ perceptions of respect and organizational justice. J Nurs Adm 34:354–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal G (1976) The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In: Berkowitz IL (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 9. Academic, New York, pp 91–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal G (1980) What should be done with equity theory? New approaches to the study of fairness in social relationship. In: Gergen K, Greenberg M, Willis R (eds) Social exchange: advances in theory and research. Plenum Press, New York, pp 27–55

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly J, Virick M, Hadani M (2010) The dynamic nature of justice: influential effects of time and work outcomes on long-term perceptions of justice. Soc Justice Res 23:37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilly J, Virick M, Wipawayangkool K (2015) Recency effects in justice and organizational citizenship behavior: the impact of coping style. J Bus Strateg 32:71–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Lind A, Tyler T (1988) The social psychology of procedural justice. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lind A, van den Bos K (2002) When fairness works: a general of uncertainty management. In: Staw BM, Kramer RM (eds) Research in organizational behavior, vol 24. Elsevier, Boston, pp 181–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Patient D, Cojuharence I, Fortin M (2015) The “when” of justice events and why it matters. In: Ambrose M, Cropanzano R (eds) Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 309–327, ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. 22 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Proudfoot D, Lind A (2015) Fairness heuristic theory, the uncertainty management model, and fairness at work. In: Ambrose M, Cropanzano R (eds) Oxford handbook of justice in the workplace. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 371–385, ProQuest Ebook Central. Web. 22 August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, DeVinney LC, Star SA, Williams RM (1949) Studies in social psychology in world war II: the American soldier, vol 1, Adjustment during army life. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner J (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: Austin WG, Worchel S (eds) The social psychology of intergroup relations. Brooks/Cole, Monterey, pp 33–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Tepper B (2000) Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manage J 43:178–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thau S, Bennett R, Mitchell M, Marrs M (2009) How management style moderates the relationship between abusive supervision and workplace deviance: an uncertainty management theory perspective. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 108(1):79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut J, Walker L (1975) Procedural justice: a psychological analysis. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut J, Walker L (1978) A theory of procedure. Calif Law Rev 66:541–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripp T, Bies R (2009) Getting even: the truth about workplace revenge – and how to stop it. Josey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T, Blader S (2000) Cooperation in groups: procedural justice, social identity, and behavioral engagement. Psychology Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T, Blader S (2003) The group engagement model: procedural justice, social identity and cooperative behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 7:349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler T, Lind A (1992) A relational model of authority in groups. In: Zanna MP (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology, vol 25. Academic, San Diego, pp 115–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bos K (2001) Uncertainty management: the influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. J Pers Soc Psychol 80:931–941

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sam Houston State University, 1821 Avenue I, Huntsville, TX, 77341-2056, USA

    Juliana D. Lilly

Authors
  1. Juliana D. Lilly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliana D. Lilly .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lilly, J.D. (2016). Organizational Justice. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2472-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2472-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation