Skip to main content

Accountability, Politics, and Power

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Accountability: responsibility, liability, answerability; Politics: government, public affairs, power struggle; Power: ability, control, authority

Definition

Accountability:

Implicit or explicit expectation that one may be called on to justify one's beliefs and actions to others, and the extent to which a person’s behaviors are observed and evaluated by others, with important rewards and punishments contingent upon those evaluations.

Politics:

The activities associated with the governance of a country or other area, especially the debate or conflict among individuals or parties having or hoping to achieve power; activities within an organization that are aimed at improving someone’s status or position

Power:

The ability to do something or act in a particular way; the capacity or ability to direct or influence the behavior of others or the course of events

Introduction

This paper explains the relationships among the concepts of accountability, politics, and power. More...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Behn RD (2001) Rethinking democratic accountability. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandsma GJ, Schillemans T (2013) The accountability cube: measuring accountability. J Public Adm Res Theory 23(4):953–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff DW, Wetterberg A (2015) Gauging the effects of social accountability on services, governance, and citizen empowerment. Public Adm Rev 76(2):274–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings LL, Anton RJ (1990) The logical and appreciative dimensions of accountability. In: Appreciative management and leadership: the power of positive thought and action in organizations. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 257–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Day P, Klein R (1987) Accountabilities: five public services, vol 357. Tavistock, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubnick MJ (2002) Seeking salvation for accountability. Paper read at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubnick MJ and George Frederickson H (2009) Accountable agents: federal performance measurement and third-party government. J Public Adm Res Theory vol 20, (Special issue):i1–i17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubnick MJ, George Frederickson H (2011) Accountable governance: problems and promises. M.E. Sharpe, Armonk

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris GR, Mitchell TR, Canavan PJ, Frink DD, Hopper H (1995) Accountability in human resource systems. In: Rosen SD, Ferris GR, Barnum DT (eds) Handbook of human resource management. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford, pp 175–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Furlong SR (1998) Political influence on the bureaucracy: the bureaucracy speaks. J Public Adm Res Theory 8(1):39–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour JB, Lewis DE (2006a) Does performance budgeting work? An examination of the office of management and budget’s PART scores. Public Adm Rev 66(5):742–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmour JB, Lewis DE (2006b) Political appointees and the competence of federal program management. Am Polit Res 34(1):22–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden MM (1998) Interest groups in the rule-making process: who participates? Whose voices get heard? J Public Adm Res Theory 8(2):245–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsten N (2015) Scrutinize me, please!: The drivers, manifestations and implications of accountability-seeking behavior. Public Adm 93(3):684–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klingner DE, Nalbandian J, Romzek BS (2002) Politics, administration, and markets conflicting expectations and accountability. Am Rev Public Adm 32(2):117–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppell JGS (2005) Pathologies of accountability: ICANN and the challenge of “multiple accountabilities disorder”. Public Adm Rev 65(1):94–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lerner JS, Tetlock PE (1999) Accounting for the effects of accountability. Psychol Bull 125(2):255–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindberg SI (2013) Mapping accountability: core concept and subtypes. Int Rev Adm Sci 79(2):202–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moynihan DP, Ingraham PW (2003) Look for the silver lining: when performance-based accountability systems work. J Public Adm Res Theory 13(4):469–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulgan R (2003) Holding power to account: accountability in modern democracies. Palgrave Macmillan, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer J (1992) Managing with power: politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Romzek BS, Dubnick MJ (1987) Accountability in the public sector: lessons from the Challenger tragedy. Public Adm Rev 47(3):227–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Romzek B, LeRoux K, Johnston J, Kempf RJ, Piatak JS (2014) Informal accountability in multisector service delivery collaborations. J Public Adm Res Theory 24(4):813–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker BR, Britt TW, Pennington J, Murphy R, Doherty K (1994) The triangle model of responsibility. Psychol Rev 101(4):632–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West WF (2005) Neutral competence and political responsiveness: an uneasy relationship. Policy Stud J 33(2):147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • West WF (2006) Presidential leadership and administrative coordination: examining the theory of a unified executive. Pres Stud Q 36(3):433–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood BD, Waterman RW (1991) The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. Am Polit Sci Rev 85(03):801–828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang K (2011) The Sisyphean Fate of Government-wide performance accountability reforms: federal performance management efforts and employees’ daily work, 2002–2008. Public Perform Manag Rev 35(1):149–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yousueng Han or Mehmet Akif Demircioglu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Han, Y., Demircioglu, M.A. (2016). Accountability, Politics, and Power. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2453-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2453-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Accountability, Politics, and Power
    Published:
    02 November 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2453-2

  2. Original

    Accountability, Politics, and Power
    Published:
    11 June 2016

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2453-1