Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Supreme Court and Public Administration

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance

  • 306 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander M (2012) The new Jim Crow: mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Alger J (2013) A supreme challenge: achieving the educational and societal benefits of diversity after the Supreme Court’s Fisher decision. J Divers High Educ 6(3):147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aziz S (2012) From the oppressed to the terrorist: Muslim American women caught in the crosshairs of intersectionality. Hastings Race Poverty Law J 9(1):191–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Best R, Edelman L, Krieger L, Eliason S (2011) Multiple disadvantages: an empirical test of intersectionality theory in EEO litigation. Law Soc Rev 45(4):991–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 74 S. Ct. 686, 98 L. Ed. 873 (1954)

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell P (1999) The content of our characterizations. Mich J Race Law 5:53–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez L (1996) Promoting racial harmony. In: Curry GE (ed) The affirmative action debate. Addison-Wesley, Reading, pp 314–325

    Google Scholar 

  • City of Richmond v. JA Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 109 S. Ct. 706, 102 L. Ed. 2d 854 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1988) Race, reform, and retrenchment: transformation and legitimation in anti- discrimination law. Harv Law Rev 101:1331–1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1989) Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago legal forum, 8(1):139–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Crenshaw K (1991) Mapping the margins: intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Rev 43(6):1241–1299

    Google Scholar 

  • Dred Scott v. Sandford, 60 U.S. 393, 15 L. Ed. 691, 15 L. Ed. 2d 691 (1857)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullilove v. Klutznick, 448 U.S. 448, 100 S. Ct. 2758, 65 L. Ed. 2d 902 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson KS (2011) Cheating welfare: public assistance and the criminalization of poverty. NYU Press, New York/London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Han S (2015) Letters of the law: race and the fantasy of colorblindness in American law. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Liesbet H, Gary M (2003) Unraveling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97(2):233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynn L (2001) The myth of the bureaucratic paradigm: what traditional public administration really stood for. Public Adm Rev 61(2):144–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meek JW (2008) Adaptive intermediate structures and local sustainability advances. Public Adm Q 32(3):415–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek JW, Newell WH (2005) Complexity, interdisciplinarity and public administration: implications for integrating communities. Public Adm Q 29(3/4):321–349

    Google Scholar 

  • Metro Broadcasting, Inc. v. FCC, 497 U.S. 547, 110 S. Ct. 2997, 111 L. Ed. 2d 445 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger GE (2014) Administrative law, public administration, and the administrative conference of the United States. George Washington Law Rev 83(4/5):1517–1539

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore WL (2014) The stare decisis of racial inequality: Supreme Court race jurisprudence and the legacy of legal apartheid in the United States. Crit Sociol 40(1):67–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhammad KG (2010) The condemnation of blackness. Harvard University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537, 16 S. Ct. 1138, 41 L. Ed. 256 (1896)

    Google Scholar 

  • Shafritz JM, Russell EW, Borick C (2016) Introducing public administration. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White LD (1926) Introduction to the study of public administration. University of Michigan/Macmillan Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Willems J (2016) Debate: should public management research be more interdisciplinary? Public Money Manag 36(2):76–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson W (1887) The study of administration. Polit Sci Q 2(2):197–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright BE, Moynihan DP, Pandey SK (2012) Pulling the levers: transformational leadership, public service motivation, and mission valence. Public Adm Rev 72(2):206–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of California, Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA

    Amy M. Magnus

Authors
  1. Amy M. Magnus
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy M. Magnus .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, Florida, USA

    Ali Farazmand

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Magnus, A.M. (2016). Supreme Court and Public Administration. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2442-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2442-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation