Organizations as Moral Agents
The evaluation of actions is a central element of social and political practice. Individuals, whether as citizens or in some official capacity, receive blame or praise for what they did or failed to do. The same goes for organizations. Judgments like the following are quite common: “Shell is responsible for the environmental disaster in Nigeria”; “The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons really deserves the Nobel Peace Prize”; “Germany has to bear an historical guilt”; “Parliament is not an innocent bystander in this case”; “Trade unions must be praised for their efforts”; or “The UN has Rwandan blood on its hands.” In statements like these organizations are referred to in the same way is common in the case of human individuals. The organizations are presented as moral agents in their own right that can be held accountable and that deserve praise or blame.
Yet, is it...
KeywordsMoral Agent Moral Worth Organizational Agency Moral Practice Methodological Individualism
- Aristotle (2000) Nicomachean ethics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Baier K (1991) Guilt and responsibility. In: May L, Hoffman S (eds) Collective responsibility. Bowman & Littlefield, Savage, pp 197–218Google Scholar
- Barry B (2001) Culture and equality: an egalitarian critique of multiculturalism. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- French P (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Columbia University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Hayek FA (1955) The counter-revolution of science. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Kant I (2012) Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
- Kymlicka W (1989) Liberalism, community, and culture. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- O’Neill O (1986) Who can endeavour peace? Can J Philos 12:41–73Google Scholar
- Popper K (1960) The poverty of historicism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
- Taylor C (1994) The politics of recognition. In: Gutmann A (ed) Multiculturalism. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
- Wasserstrom R (1991) Conduct and responsibility in war. In: May L, Hoffman S (eds) Collective responsibility. Bowman & Littlefield, Savage, pp 179–196Google Scholar
- Weber M (1978) Economy and society. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar