Value Congruence

  • Anthony D. MolinaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2339-1

Synonyms

Definition

Value congruence refers to the degree to which an individual’s values match the values found in their work environment.

Introduction

Research on value congruence focuses on the degree to which an individual’s personal values match the values they encounter in their work environment, as well as the behavioral and attitudinal outcomes that result from varying degrees of agreement between these values. Different types of congruence explored in the literature include person-organization, person-job, person-group, and person-supervisor congruence (Kristoff-Brown et al. 2005). Scholarly attention to value congruence is relatively recent, with much of it emerging in the last two to three decades. A notable exception here is found in the work of Chester Barnard (1948) who emphasized the importance of values in integrating individuals into the organization. Similarly, Argyris (1964) was an...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Argyris C (1964) Integrating the individual and the organization. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bao Y, Simon D, Shay T (2012) Value congruence in organizations: literature review, theoretical perspectives, and future directions. ESADE working paper number 239. ESADE working paper series. Retrieved 15 Jan 2016: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2154976
  3. Barnard C (1948) The functions of the executive. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bass B (1985) Leadership: good, better, best. Organ Dyn 13(3):26–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bocchino C, Hartman B, Foley P (2003) The relationship between person-organization congruence, perceived violations of the psychological contract, and occupational stress symptoms. Consult Psychol J Pract Res 55(4):203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewer G, Selden SC, Facer R (2000) Individual conceptions of public service motivation. Public Adm Rev 60(3):254–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brown M, Trevino L (2009) Leader-follower values congruence: are socialized leaders better able to achieve it? J Appl Psychol 94(2):478–490CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen R, Wright B (2011) The effects of public service motivation on job choice decisions: disentangling the contributions of person-organization fit and person-job fit. J Public Adm Res Theory 21:723–743CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Edwards J, Cable D (2009) The value of value congruence. J Appl Psych 94(3):654–677Google Scholar
  10. Kristoff-Brown A, Zimmerman R, Johnson E (2005) Consequences of individuals’ fit at work: a meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Pers Psychol 58:281–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lamm E, Gordon J, Purser R (2010) The role of value congruence in organizational change. Organ Dev J 28(2):49–64Google Scholar
  12. Liedtka J (1989) Value congruence: the interplay of individual and organizational value systems. J Bus Ethics 8:805–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Meglino B, Ravlin E (1998) Individual values in organizations: concepts, controversies, and research. J Manag 24(3):351–389Google Scholar
  14. Moynihan D, Pandey S (2007) The ties that bind: social networks, person-organization value fit, and turnover intention. J Public Adm Res Theory 18:205–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Paarlberg L, Perry J (2007) Values management: aligning employee values and organizational goals. Am Rev Public Adm 37(4):387–408CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Peng S, Pandey S, Pandey S (2015) Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual-organizational value congruence. Public Adm Rev 75(4):585–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Perry J, Hondeghem A, Wise LR (2010) Revisiting the motivational bases of public service: twenty years of research and an agenda for the future. Public Adm Rev 70(5):681–690CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Posner B (1992) Person-organization values congruence: no support for individual differences as a moderating influence. Hum relat 45(4):351–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Posner B (2010) Another look at the impact of personal and organizational values congruency. J Bus Ethics 97:535–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Posner B, Schmidt W (1993) Values congruence and differences between the interplay of personal and organizational value systems. J Bus Ethics 12:341–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ren T (2010) Value congruence as a source of intrinsic motivation. KYKLOS 63(1):94–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Schein E (2010) Organizational culture and leadership, 4th edn. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  23. Schneider B (1987) The people make the place. Pers Psychol 40:437–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Selznick P (1957) Leadership in administration: a sociological interpretation. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  25. Wright B, Pandey S (2008) Public service motivation and the assumption of person-organization fit: testing the mediating effect of value congruence. Adm Soc 40(5):502–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kent State UniversityKentUSA