Performance Evaluation and Reporting

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2316-1

Synonyms

Definitions

Performance evaluation and reporting should be studied under the complex and multidimensional concept of performance. Performance evaluation is an important element in the management control of an organization through the incorporation of key performance indicators in performance measurement systems. After the new public management (NPM) era, greater attention has been put on the performance evaluation process as a way to lead to organizational improvements. There may be an interrelationship between the control focus of an organization and the aspects which are emphasized in the evaluation of performance (an internal perspective). Performance reportingis linked to the concept of accountability and to the need to improve the reputation of an entity (an external perspective). This linkage between performance reporting and...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was financed by FEDER - Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional funds through the COMPETE 2020 - Operacional Programme for Competitiveness and Internationalisation (POCI), and by Portuguese funds through FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia in the framework of the project POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016908 (PTDC/IIM-GES/6923/2014).

References

  1. Araújo J, Branco J (2009) Implementing performance-based management in the traditional bureaucracy of Portugal. Public Adm 87(3):557–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Behn R (2003) Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Adm Rev 63(5):588–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boyne G, Law J (2005) Setting public service outcome targets: lessons from local public service agreements. Public Money Manag 25(4):253–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brusca I, Montesinos V (2016) Implementing performance reporting in local government: a cross-countries comparison. Public Perform Manag Rev 39:506–534CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Budding TG (2004) Accountability, environmental uncertainty and government performance: evidence from Dutch municipalities. Manag Account Res 15:285–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Creso SM, Kretz A, Sigurdson K (2013) Accountability, performance assessment, and evaluation: policy pressures and responses from research councils. Res Eval 22:105–117Google Scholar
  7. Gomes P, Mendes S (2013) Performance measurement and management in Portuguese law enforcement. Public Money Manag 33(1):31–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gomes P, Mendes S, Carvalho J (2008) Use of performance measurement in the public sector: the case of the police service. In: Implementing reforms in public sector accounting. Coimbra: Coimbra University PressGoogle Scholar
  9. Gomes P, Fernandes MJ, Carvalho J (2015). Use of performance information by local politicians: a field study in the Portuguese context. In: 15th Biennial CIGAR Conference 2015-04 and 05 June, MaltaGoogle Scholar
  10. Hammerschmid G, van de Walle S, Stimac V (2013) Internal and external use of performance information in public organizations: results from an international survey. Public Money Manag 33(4):261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hood C (1995) The ‘new public management’ in the 1980s: variations on a theme. Acc Organ Soc 20(2/3):93–109CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jansen (2008) New public management: perspectives on performance and the use of performance information. Financ Account Manag 24(2):169–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jorge S, Carvalho J, Fernandes MJ (2008) From cash to accruals in Portuguese local government accounting: what has truly changed? Tékhne 6(10):239–261Google Scholar
  14. Lacey D, Cuganesan S, Goode S, Jacobs K (2012) Celebrating Adversity: Inter-organizational dependence and public sector performance reporting in the Australian federal police. Public Adm 90:393–411Google Scholar
  15. Lapsley I, Pallot J (2000) Accounting, management and organizational change: a comparative study of local government. Manag Account Res 11:213–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Moynihan D, Pandey S (2010) The big question for performance management: why do managers use performance information? J Public Adm Res Theory 20(4):849–866CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Pollitt C (2006) Performance information for democracy: the missing link? Evaluation 12(38):38–55Google Scholar
  18. Recommended Practice Guideline (2013) Reporting service performance information. IPSASB, RPG (exposure draft 54)Google Scholar
  19. Rodrigues M (2009) The contribution of performance evaluation to the professionalization of public administration. Paper presented at the IASIA annual conference, Aug. Rio de Janeiro, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  20. ter Bogt H (2001) Politicians and output-oriented performance evaluation in municipalities. Eur Account Rev 10(3):621–643CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ter Bogt H (2003) Performance evaluation styles in governmental organizations: how do professional managers facilitate politicians’ work? Manag Account Res 14:311–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. van Helden J, Johnsen A, Vakkuri J (2012) The life-cycle approach of performance management research; implications for public management and evaluation. Evaluation 18(2):159–175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Veledar B, Bašić M, Kapić J (2014) Performance measurement in public sector of transition countries. Bus Syst Res 5:72–83Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Research on Accounting and TaxationPolytechnic Institute of Cávado and Ave (IPCA)BarcelosPortugal