Skip to main content

Innovation in Public Sector Accounting

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance
  • 311 Accesses

Synonyms

Accounting reform; Accounting change; Accounting renewal; NPFM, New Public Financial Management

Definition

Innovation is an umbrella term. In the public sector, it refers to the “creation and implementation of new processes, products, services and methods of delivery which result in significant improvements in outcomes, efficiency, effectiveness or quality” (Albury 2005). Innovation is more than “gradually increasing efficiency and making things better,” because it requires “doing things differently” (Hartley 2014).

This applies to public sector accounting and financial management, too, which have seen a continuous introduction of new techniques, methods, documents, and processes in many countries over at least the last 30 years. Lüder (1994, p. 1) defines governmental accounting innovations as “conceptual, not merely procedural changes of the accounting system to ensure the supply of comprehensive, reliable and meaningful financial information needed for appropriate...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albury D (2005) Fostering innovation in public services. Public Money Manag 25(1):51–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Anthony RN (1983) Tell it like it was: a conceptual framework for financial accounting. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca I, Caperchione E, Cohen S, Manes Rossi F (eds) (2015) Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe: the challenge of harmonization. Macmillan, Palgrave

    Google Scholar 

  • Cangiano M, Curristine T, Lazare M (2013) Public financial management and its emerging architecture. International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Caperchione E (2000) Trends and open issues in governmental accounting systems: some elements of comparison. In: Caperchione E, Mussari R (eds) Comparative issues in local government accounting. Kluwer, Boston

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Caperchione E (2006) The new public management. A perspective for finance practitioners. Brussels, FEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Caperchione E, Salvatori F (2012) Rethinking the relationship between local government and financial markets. Public Money Manag 32(1):21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caperchione E, Brusca I, Cohen S, Manes Rossi F (2016) Editorial: innovations in public sector financial management. Int J Public Sector Perform Manag 2(4):303–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan JL (1996) Characterizing a nation’s governmental accounting system. In: Lüder K (ed) Recent developments in CIGAR. Forschungsinstitut, Speyer, pp 239–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen M (2005) The ‘third hand’: private sector consultants in public sector accounting change. Eur Account Rev 14(3):447–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley J (2014) New development: eight and a half propositions to stimulate frugal innovation. Public Money Manag 34(3):227–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Lande E, Lüder K, Portal M (2013) A comparison of budgeting and accounting reforms in the national governments of France, Germany, the UK and the US. Fin Account Manag 29(4):419–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liguori M, Steccolini I (2014) Accounting, innovation and public-sector change. Translating reforms into change? Crit Perspect Account 25(4–5):319–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lourenço RP, Moura e Sá P, Jorge S, Pattaro AF (2013) Online transparency for accountability: one assessing model and two applications. Elect J e-Govern 11(2):280–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1987) Ein kaufmännisches Rechnungswesen für die öffentliche Verwaltung? Plädoyer für das Überdenken der Zweckmäßigkeit des staatlichen Rechnungswesens in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland. In: Eichhorn P (ed) Doppik und Kameralistik. Nomos, Baden-Baden

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1988) Governmental accounting in west European countries: with special reference to the Federal Republic of Germany. In: Chan JL, Jones RH (eds) Governmental accounting and auditing: international comparisons. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1989) Comparative Government accounting study. Interim summary report, Speyerer Forschungsberichte, n. 76, Forschungsinstitut, Speyer

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1994) The contingency model reconsidered: experiences from Italy, Japan and Spain. In: Buschor E, Schedler K (eds) Perspectives on performance measurement and public sector accounting. Paul Haupt, Bern

    Google Scholar 

  • Lüder K (1999) Konzeptionelle Grundlagen des Neuen Kommunalen Rechnungswesens (Speyerer Verfahren), 2. Auflage. Staatsanzeiger für Baden-Württemberg, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Helden J, Ouda H (2016) Public sector accounting in emerging economies. Crit Perspect Account 40:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Helden J, Argento D, Caperchione E, Caruana J (2016) Politicians and accounting information: a marriage of convenience? Public Money Manag 36(7):473–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eugenio Caperchione .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Caperchione, E. (2017). Innovation in Public Sector Accounting. In: Farazmand, A. (eds) Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2307-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_2307-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31816-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Economics and FinanceReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics