Organizational Socialization

  • Deneen M. HatmakerEmail author
  • Stéphane Moyson
  • Nadine Raaphorst
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31816-5_148-1

Synonyms

Definition

Organizational socialization is the process by which newcomers become effective organizational members.

Introduction

Public sector organizations are largely assessed by their effectiveness and to a large extent their effectiveness relies on their most important asset – employees. As such, how to transition new employees into effective organizational members who are likely to serve the organization for a long time is a key concern for public sector managers. They may expend a great deal of effort and resources to bring new employees onboard through activities such as orientation, training, mentoring, buddy systems, and on-the-job training. These activities comprise formal organizational socialization tactics – the means by which an organization inculcates newcomers with the organizational culture and transforms them into full-fledged, effective organizational members (Van Maanen and Schein 1979...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ashford S, Black J (1996) Proactivity during organizational entry: the role of desire for control. J Appl Psychol 81:199–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashforth B (2001) Role transitions in organizational life: an identity-based perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, MahwahGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth B, Sluss D, Harrison S (2007) Socialization in organizational contexts. Int Rev Ind Organ Psychol 22:1–70Google Scholar
  4. Bauer T, Morrison E, Callister R (1998) Organizational socialization: a review and directions for future research. In: Ferris G (ed) Research in personnel and human resource management. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 149–214Google Scholar
  5. Bauer T, Bodnerr T, Erdogan B, Truxillo D, Tucker J (2007) Newcomer adjustment during organizational socialization: a meta-analytic review of antecedents, outcomes, and methods. J Appl Psychol 92:707–721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beyers J (2010) Conceptual and methodological challenges in the study of European socialization. J Eur Publ Policy 17:909–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradbury M, Kellough J (2011) Representative bureaucracy: assessing the evidence on active representation. Am Rev Public Admin 41:157–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bright L (2010) Why age matters in the work preferences of public employees: a comparison of three age-related explanations. Public Pers Manag 39:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Checkel J (2005) International institutions and socialization in Europe: Introduction and framework. International Organization 59:801–826Google Scholar
  10. Collins N (1985) Councillor/officer relations in Irish local government: alternative models. Public Adm 63:327–344CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Crant J (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. J Manag 26:435–462Google Scholar
  12. Davis R (2011) Blue-collar public servants: how union membership influences public service motivation. Am Rev Public Admin 41:705–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dolan J (2002) Representative bureaucracy in the federal executive: gender and spending priorities. J Public Adm Res Theory 12:353–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dougherty G, Van Gelder M (2015) Public agency hiring, minimum qualifications, and experience. Rev Public PersAdmin 35:169–192Google Scholar
  15. Fang R, Duffy MK, Shaw JD (2011) The organizational socialization process: review and development of a social capital model. J Manag 37(1):127–152Google Scholar
  16. Gould-Williams J, Bottomley P, Redman T, Snape E, Bishop D, Limpanitgul T, Mostafa A (2014) Civic duty and employee outcomes: do high commitment human resource practices and work overload matter? Public Adm 92:937–953CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hatmaker D (2015) Bringing networks in: a model of organizational socialization in the public sector. Public Manag Rev 17:1146–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jackson M, Smith R (1996) Inside moves and outside views: an Australian case study of elite and public perceptions of political corruption. Governance 9:23–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jaskyte K (2005) The impact of organizational socialization tactics on role ambiguity and role conflict of newly hired social workers. Adm Soc Work 29:69–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jaskyte K, Lee M (2009) Organizational commitment of social workers: an exploratory study. Adm Soc Work 33:227–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones G (1986) Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Acad Manag J 29:262–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kjeldsen A (2014) Dynamics of public service motivation: attraction–selection and socialization in the production and regulation of social services. Public Adm Rev 74:101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kjeldsen A, Jacobsen C (2013) Public service motivation and employment sector: attraction or socialization? J Public Adm Res Theory 23:899–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Louis M (1980) Surprise and sense making: what newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Adm Sci Q 25:226–251CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morrison E (1993) Newcomer information-seeking – exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Acad Manag J 36:557–589CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murdoch Z, Geys B (2012) Instrumental calculation, cognitive role-playing, or both? Self-perceptions of seconded national experts in the European Commission. J Eur Publ Policy 19:1357–1376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oberfield Z (2014) Becoming bureaucrats: socialization at the front lines of government service. University of Pennsylvania Press, PhiladelphiaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Peng S, Pandey S, Pandey S (2015) Is there a nonprofit advantage? Examining the impact of institutional context on individual-organizational value congruence. Public Adm Rev 75:585–596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Perry J (1996) Measuring public service motivation. An assessment of construct reliability and validity. J Public Adm Res Theory 6:5–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Perry J (1997) Antecedents of public service motivation. J Public Adm Res Theory 7:181–197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Quaglia L, De Francesco F, Radaelli C (2008) Committee governance and socialization in the European Union. J Eur Publ Policy 15:155–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Romzek B (1990) Employee investment and commitment: the ties that bind. Public Adm Rev 50:374–382CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Saks A, Ashforth B (1997a) Organizational socialization: making sense of the past and present as a prologue for the future. J Vocat Behav 51:234–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Saks A, Ashforth B (1997b) Socialization tactics and newcomer information acquisition. Int J Sel Assess 5:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Suvarierol S, Bsuioc M, Groenleer M (2013) Working for Europe? Socialization in the European Commission and agencies of the European Union. Public Adm 91:908–927CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Kleef D (2016) Changing the nature of the beast: how organizational socialization contributes to the development of the organizational role identity of Dutch veterinary inspectors. PhD dissertation, Leiden University, Leiden.Google Scholar
  37. Van Maanen J, Schein E (1979) Toward a theory of organizational socialization. In: Staw B (ed) Research in organizational behavior, vol 1. JAI Press, Greenwich, pp 209–264Google Scholar
  38. Vandenabeele W (2011) Who wants to deliver public service? Do institutional antecedents of public service motivation provide an answer? Rev Public Pers Admin 31:87–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilkins V, Williams B (2008) Black or blue: racial profiling and representative bureaucracy. Public Adm Rev 68:654–664CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilkins V, Williams B (2009) Representing blue: representative bureaucracy and racial profiling in the Latino community. Admin Soc 40:775–798CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deneen M. Hatmaker
    • 1
    Email author
  • Stéphane Moyson
    • 2
  • Nadine Raaphorst
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Public PolicyUniversity of ConnecticutWest HartfordUSA
  2. 2.Institut de Sciences Politiques Louvain-EuropeUniversité catholique de LouvainLouvain-la-NeuveBelgium
  3. 3.Department of Public Administration and SociologyErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands